Navier–Stokes solvers in European aircraft design

The paper gives a broad perspective of the progress made during the last 10 years in solving the Navier-Stokes equations and traces how this simulation technique went from being a specialized research topic to a practical engineering tool that design engineers use on a routine basis. The scope is limited to Navier-Stokes solvers applied to industrial design of airframes with attention focused particularly on developments in Europe. An overview of the different Navier-Stokes codes used in Europe is given, and on-going developments are outlined. The current state of progress is illustrated by computed steady and unsteady solutions to industrial problems, ranging from airfoil characteristics, flow around an isolated wing, to full aircraft configurations. A discussion on the future industrial design environment is given, and developments in Europe towards a more integrated design approach with underlying concepts like 'concurrent engineering (CE)' and the 'virtual product (VP)' are summarized. The paper concludes with a discussion on future challenging applications.

[1]  A. Ronzheimer,et al.  Assessment of Advanced Transport-Equation Turbulence Models for Aircraft Aerodynamic Performance Prediction , 1999 .

[2]  Henri Braudel,et al.  Overall presentation of the ENHANCE project , 2001 .

[3]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  A Parallel Multilevel Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grids with Embedded Boundaries , 2000 .

[4]  George N. Barakos,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the Dynamic Stall Phenomenon Using Non-Linear Eddy-Viscosity Models , 1998 .

[5]  Norbert Kroll,et al.  Structured Grid Solvers I - Accurate and Efficient Flow Solvers for 3D Applications on Structured Meshes , 1994 .

[6]  J. Lumley,et al.  A Realizable Reynolds Stress Algebraic Equation Model , 1993 .

[7]  Numerical Study of Wake Vortices of a Generic Aircraft Model , 2001 .

[8]  Numerically robust 3-D finite element Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes solver for the study of turbulent supersonic external flows , 1998 .

[9]  Andrew M. Price VIRTUAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CASE STUDY OF THE T-45 HORIZONTAL STABILATOR , 1998 .

[10]  Residual-Based Compactness versus Directionality for High-Order Compressible Flow Calculations , 2001 .

[11]  A. R. Collar,et al.  The Expanding Domain of Aeroelasticity , 1946, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[12]  J. Krammer,et al.  Multidisciplinary Aerodynamics/Structure Dynamics High-Performance Simulation and Optimization , 1999 .

[13]  Michel Mallet,et al.  A comprehensive finite element Navier-Stokes solver for low- and high-speed aircraft design , 1994 .

[14]  P. Roache Verification of Codes and Calculations , 1998 .

[15]  Thomas A. Zang,et al.  AIAA 99-3798 Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Techniques: Implications and Opportunities for Fluid Dynamics Research , 1999 .

[16]  R. Radespiel,et al.  Preconditioning Methods for Low-Speed Flows. , 1996 .

[17]  S. Stokes,et al.  Efficient numerical store trajectory prediction for complex aircraft/store configurations , 1999 .

[18]  C. Weber Parallel Implicit Computation of Turbulent Transonic Flow around a Complete Aircraft Configuration , 1997, Parallel CFD.

[19]  Á. Velázquez,et al.  Aerodynamics Performance Prediction of Thrust-Vectoring Nozzles , 1998 .

[20]  Oddvar O. Bendiksen,et al.  Nonlinear aspects of the transonic aeroelastic stability problem , 1988 .

[21]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1999 .

[22]  S. Girimaji Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model , 1995 .

[23]  Ph. Guillen,et al.  Development of a Chimera unsteady method for the numerical simulation of rotorcraft flowfields , 1998 .

[24]  Frank Thiele,et al.  The MEGAFLOW project , 2000 .

[25]  Patrik Rautaheimo,et al.  Performance of a Parallel CFD-Code on a Linux Cluster , 1999 .

[26]  Andreas Knipfer,et al.  Investigations of an Oscillating Supercritical 2D Wing Section in a Transonic Flow , 1999 .

[27]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Third-order accurate finite volume schemes for Euler computations on curvilinear meshes , 2001 .

[28]  John W. Edwards,et al.  AIAA 98-2421 An Overview of Recent Developments in Computational Aeroelasticity , 1998 .

[29]  Werner Haase,et al.  Progress in Computational Flow-Structure Interaction , 2003 .

[30]  Dieter Schwamborn,et al.  Applications of the DLR-TAU Code to Fluid-Structure Interaction on Hybrid Grids , 2000 .

[31]  L. Carr,et al.  Compressibility effects on dynamic stall , 1996 .

[32]  Alain Dervieux,et al.  Computation and comparison of efficient turbulence models for aeronautics - European Research Project ETMA , 1998 .

[33]  S. P. Spekreijse,et al.  Efficient and accurate implementation of the k-omega turbulence model in the NLR multi-block Navier-Stokes system , 2000 .

[34]  R. F. Warming,et al.  Alternating Direction Implicit Methods for Parabolic Equations with a Mixed Derivative , 1980 .

[35]  Achi Brandt,et al.  Distributed Relaxation Multigrid and Defect Correction Applied to the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1999 .

[36]  R. Swanson,et al.  Multistage Schemes With Multigrid for Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[37]  F. Moens,et al.  Numerical simulation of the propeller/wing interactions for transport aircraft , 2001 .

[38]  Peter Thiede,et al.  Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Technologies , 2001 .

[39]  Martine Baelmans,et al.  A Finite Volume Formulation for Compact Schemes on Arbitrary Meshes with Applications to LES , 2001 .

[40]  I. Lindblad,et al.  CFD prediction of maximum lift of a 2D high lift configuration , 1999 .

[41]  Stefan Hein,et al.  NONLINEAR TRANSITION PREDICTION , 2000 .

[42]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[43]  A. Benkenida,et al.  Patched grid and adaptive mesh refinement strategies for the calculation of the transport of vortices , 2002 .

[44]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Directional agglomeration multigrid techniques for high Reynolds number viscous flow solvers , 1998 .

[45]  Vincent J. Harrand,et al.  ACTIVE VORTICAL FLOW CONTROL FOR ALLEVIATION OF TWIN-TAIL BUFFET OF GENERIC FIGHTER AIRCRAFT , 2001 .

[46]  David Lovell,et al.  Progress Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Analysis and Optimisation Capability for Air Vehicle Assessment and Design - a UK Research Establishment View , 2000 .

[47]  J. V. Ingen A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region , 1956 .

[48]  Zdobysław Goraj,et al.  A review of the influence of high angle of attack aerodynamics on aircraft dynamic stability , 1995 .

[49]  Regine Ahrem,et al.  Aeroelastic Computation Using the AMANDA Simulation Environment , 2001 .

[50]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF CONFLUENT BOUNDARY LAYERS IN HIGH-LIFT FLOWS , 1998 .

[51]  Vincent Guinot,et al.  High-Order Fluxes for Conservative Skew-Symmetric-like Schemes in Structured Meshes , 2000 .

[52]  T. Colonius Lectures on computational aeroacoustics , 1997 .

[53]  P. Eliasson,et al.  UNSTEADY EULER COMPUTATIONS THROUGH NON-MATCHING AND SLIDING-ZONE INTERFACES , 1998 .

[54]  D. Wilcox Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[55]  Johannes Schweiger,et al.  Development and application of the integrated structural design tool LAGRANGE , 1996 .

[56]  S. P. Spekreijse,et al.  ENFLOW a full-functionality system of CFD codes for industrial Euler/Navier-Stokes flow computations , 1996 .

[57]  M. Hepperle,et al.  Benchmark Test for Euler Calculations of a High Lift Configuration Vortex Wake , 2002 .

[58]  Hendrik Willem Marie Hoeijmakers,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of a Complete Aircraft , 1998 .

[59]  H. Lomax,et al.  Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows , 1978 .

[60]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  An algorithm for unsteady viscous flows at all speeds , 2000 .

[61]  D. Arnal,et al.  Laminar-turbulent transition prediction in three-dimensional flows , 2000 .

[62]  Arno Ronzheimer,et al.  Aerodynamic Applications using MegaCads , 1998 .

[63]  H. Deyhle,et al.  Experiments on Transonic Flutter of a Two-Dimensional Supercritical Wing with Emphasis on the Non-Linear Effects. , 1996 .

[64]  Arno Ronzheimer,et al.  The Parametric Grid Generation System MegaCads. , 1996 .

[65]  Erkki Soinne,et al.  Aerodynamically balanced ailerons for a commuter aircraft , 2001 .

[66]  Cord-Christian Rossow,et al.  Engine Integration on Future Transport Aircraft - The European Research Programs DUPRIN / ENIFAIR , 1998 .

[67]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Getting the Full Benefits of CFD in Conceptual Design , 1998 .

[68]  K. C. Chang,et al.  PREDICTION OF AEROELASTIC EFFECTS OF AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONS INCLUDING HIGH LIFT SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[69]  T. Su,et al.  Navier-Stokes analyses of a 747 high lift configuration , 1998 .

[70]  Pradeep Raj,et al.  CFD at a Crossroads: An Industry Perspective , 1998 .

[71]  L. Cambier,et al.  elsA - An efficient object-oriented solution to CFD complexity , 2002 .

[72]  Klaus Hünecke Modern combat aircraft design , 1987 .

[73]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  Airplane design: Past, present, and future , 2002 .

[74]  Christophe Eric Corre,et al.  A residual-based compact scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2001 .

[75]  R. Rudnik Towards CFD Validation for 3D High Lift Flows - EUROLIFT , 2001 .

[76]  Moses Farmer,et al.  Comparison of supercritical and conventional wing flutter characteristics , 1976 .

[78]  Antony Jameson,et al.  A perspective on computational algorithms for aerodynamic analysis and design , 2001 .

[79]  K. Pahlke,et al.  TOWARDS THE CFD COMPUTATION OF THE COMPLETE HELICOPTER: FIRST RESULTS OBTAINED BY FRENCH AND GERMAN RESEARCH CENTERS , 2000 .

[80]  Jos Meijer,et al.  Understanding and development of a prediction method of transonic limit cycle oscillation characteristics of fighter aircraft , 1992 .

[81]  Elliptic Grid Generation , 1999 .

[82]  J. Szodruch,et al.  Variable wing camber for transport aircraft , 1988 .

[83]  Eric Rebentisch,et al.  Challenges in the Better, Faster, Cheaper Era of Aeronautical Design, Engineering and Manufacturing , 2000 .

[84]  Stephen Rolston High Reynolds number tools and techniques for civil aircraft design - An overview of the European 'HiReTT' project , 2001 .

[85]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Computation of Viscous Flow for a Boeing 777 Aircraft in Landing Configuration , 2000 .

[86]  Julien Bohbot,et al.  A parallel multigrid conservative patched/sliding mesh algorithm for turbulent flow computation of 3D complex aircraft configurations , 2001 .

[87]  I. Lindblad,et al.  The engineering of multiblock/multigrid software for Navier-Stokes flows on structured meshes , 1993 .

[88]  Timo Siikonen,et al.  Conservative multiblock Navier-Stokes solver for arbitrarily deforming geometries , 1995 .

[89]  Klaus Huenecke,et al.  Vortex wakes from large aircraft - A challenge for industrial research , 2000 .

[90]  A. Elsenaar Separation in transonic flow: a shocking experience , 1997 .

[91]  F. Wubs Notes on numerical fluid mechanics , 1985 .

[92]  Koji Isogai,et al.  On the Transonic-Dip Mechanism of Flutter of a Sweptback Wing , 1979 .

[93]  Thomas Gerz,et al.  Commercial aircraft wake vortices , 2002 .

[94]  Johan C. Kok,et al.  Resolving the Dependence on Freestream Values for the k- Turbulence Model , 2000 .

[95]  Cyril Gacherieu,et al.  NAVIER-STOKES CALCULATIONS AT AEROSPATIALE MATRA AIRBUS FOR AIRCRAFT DESIGN , 2000 .

[96]  Ralf Heinrich,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Flows Using the Chimera-Technique , 1999 .

[97]  T. Krißler A Conceptual Design Methodology for the Estimation of the Local Shock Locations on Optimized Transonic Wings , 1999 .

[98]  Diagonalization of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with the Reynolds-stress Turbulence Model , 1996 .

[99]  S. P. Spekreijse,et al.  Semi-automatic domain decomposition based on potential theory , 2000 .

[100]  W. Haase,et al.  ECARP - European computational aerodynamics research project : validation of CFD codes and assessment of turbulence models , 1997 .

[101]  M. Stettner,et al.  Multi-Objective Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Optimization , 2001 .

[102]  Osama A. Kandil,et al.  Twin Tail/Delta Wing Configuration Buffet Due to Unsteady Vortex Breakdown Flow , 1996 .

[103]  Unmeel B. Mehta,et al.  Guide to credible computer simulations of fluid flows , 1996 .

[104]  Michel Costes,et al.  Helicopter Fuselage Drag Prediction: State of the art in Europe , 2001 .

[105]  M. Rakowitz Grid Refinement Study with a Megaliner Wing-Body Configuration" , 2000 .

[106]  Large-Eddy Simulations of Two Disturbed Counter-Rotating Vortex Pairs , 2002 .

[107]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  Characteristic time-stepping or local preconditioning of the Euler equations , 1991 .

[108]  John F. Lynn,et al.  Multi-stage schemes for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations with optimal smoothing , 1993 .

[109]  I. Lindblad,et al.  Application of two-equation and EARSM turbulence models to high lift aerodynamics , 1999 .

[110]  L. D. Kral Recent experience with different turbulence models applied to the calculation of flow over aircraft components , 1998 .

[111]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[112]  T. Gerhold,et al.  Calculation of Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations Employing the DLR-tau-Code , 1997 .

[113]  I. Fejtek,et al.  Summary of code validation results for a multiple element airfoil test case , 1997 .

[114]  P. Raj,et al.  Aircraft design in the 21st century - Implications for design methods , 1998 .

[115]  U. Mehta Credible Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations , 1998 .

[116]  R. C. Swanson,et al.  An algorithm for ideal multigrid convergence for the steady Euler equations , 1999 .

[117]  Neil D. Sandham,et al.  Progress in the Development of a Class of Efficient Low Dissipative High Order Shock-Capturing Methods , 2000 .

[118]  Hans-Peter Kersken,et al.  The Distributed Engineering Framework TENT , 2000, VECPAR.

[119]  Peter K. C. Rudolph,et al.  High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners , 1996 .

[120]  P. Sagaut,et al.  Large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil , 2001 .

[121]  Dieter Schwamborn,et al.  MEGAFLOW: Parallel complete aircraft CFD , 2001, Parallel Comput..

[122]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Computational Study of Vortex Breakdown over Swept Delta Wings , 1999 .

[123]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Soft computing in multidisciplinary aerospace design—new directions for research , 2002 .

[124]  A. Gould,et al.  Application of two-equation turbulence models in aircraft design , 1996 .

[125]  D. Rizzetta Evaluation of Explicit Algebraic Reynolds-Stress Models for Separated Supersonic Flows , 1998 .

[126]  William L. Kleb,et al.  Efficient .Multi-Stage Time Marching for Viscous' Flows via. Local Preconditioning , 1999 .

[127]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[128]  S. Tiwari,et al.  Investigation of turbulent separation at wing-body junction using nonlinear k-epsilon turbulence model , 1996 .

[129]  Joachim Szrodruch,et al.  Building the future aircraft design for the next century , 1998 .

[130]  Franck Nicoud,et al.  A CONSISTENT FINITE ELEMENT APPROACH TO LARGE EDDY SIMULATION , 1998 .

[131]  T. B. Gatski,et al.  Nonlinear eddy viscosity and algebraic stress models for solving complex turbulent flows , 2000 .

[132]  Robert T. Biedron,et al.  NAVIER-STOKES SOLVER TO THE ANALYSIS OF MULTIELEMENT AIRFOILS AND WINGS USING MULTIZONAL GRID TECHNIQUES , 1995 .

[133]  John A. Ekaterinaris,et al.  Evaluation of turbulence models for unsteady flows of an oscillating airfoil , 1995 .

[134]  Bernhard Müller,et al.  Low-Mach-Number Asymptotics of the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[135]  E. Chaput,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN AERODYNAMICS INSIDE THE NSMB (NAVIER STOKES MULTI BLOCK) CONSORTIUM , 1998 .

[136]  K. Isogai,et al.  Transonic dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing. II , 1981 .

[137]  Jean-Antoine Désidéri,et al.  Hypersonic flows for reentry problems , 1991 .

[138]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. By C. HIRSCH. Wiley. Vol. 1, Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization. 1988. 515 pp. £60. Vol. 2, Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows. 1990, 691 pp. £65. , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[139]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Design-oriented high-lift methodology for general aviation and civil transport aircraft , 2001 .

[140]  C. L. Merkle,et al.  The application of preconditioning in viscous flows , 1993 .

[141]  P. Gardarein,et al.  Improvements on computations of high speed propeller unsteady aerodynamics , 2003 .

[142]  Rosemary A. Renaut,et al.  COMPUTING AERODYNAMICALLY GENERATED NOISE , 1997 .

[143]  Joseph Giesing,et al.  A summary of industry MDO applications and needs , 1998 .

[144]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  CFD based simulation of the unsteady aeroelastic response of a maneuvering vehicle , 2000 .

[145]  Robert Tomaro,et al.  The defining methods of Cobalt-60 - A parallel, implicit, unstructured Euler/Navier-Stokes flow solver , 1999 .

[146]  D. R. Hall,et al.  Concepts for Lift Improvements of a High-Lift Military Airfoil. , 1999 .

[147]  Jeffrey A. Drezner,et al.  Maintaining Future Military Aircraft Design Capability , 1992 .

[148]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Advances in overset CFD processes applied to subsonic high-lift aircraft , 2000 .

[149]  P. Sagaut,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Models for Large-Eddy Simulations of Compressible Wall Bounded Flows , 2000 .

[150]  John Evans,et al.  Efficient Computation of 3D-Flows for Complex Configurations with the DLR-TAU Code , 1999 .

[151]  Osama A. Kandil,et al.  Natural rolling responses of a delta wing in transonic and subsonic flows , 1996 .

[152]  S. Melber,et al.  Parallel Large Scale Computations for Aerodynamic Aircraft Design with the German CFD System MEGAFLOW , 2002 .

[153]  O. Pironneau,et al.  Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids , 2001 .

[154]  Eric Charlton COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY IN HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS , 2000 .

[155]  M. Amato,et al.  NON LINEAR κ-ε TURBULENCE MODELING FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[156]  David Kokan,et al.  The Synaps Pointer Optimization Engine , 2002 .

[157]  K. Pahlke,et al.  Progress towards the CFD Computation of the complete Helicopter: Recent results obtained by research centers in the framework of the franco-german Chance Project , 2002 .

[158]  Rafael Palacios,et al.  Assessment of strategies for correcting linear unsteady aerodynamics using CFD or experimental results , 2001 .

[159]  Arthur Rizzi,et al.  Reynolds Stress Transport Modeling of Transonic Flow Around the RAE2822 Airfoil , 1994 .

[160]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  Local Preconditioning: Manipulating Mother Nature to Fool Father Time , 1998 .

[161]  Arno Ronzheimer,et al.  3D RANS Simulations for Transport Aircraft High Lift Configurations , 2000 .

[162]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Computational aeroacoustics - Issues and methods , 1995 .

[163]  Lars Davidson,et al.  LESFOIL: A European Project on Large Eddy Simulations Around a High-lift Airfoil at High Reynolds Number , 2000 .

[164]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Analysis for High-Lift Configurations Using a Parallel Unstructured Multigrid Solver , 1999 .

[165]  D. Schwamborn,et al.  The DLR-F5 Wing Test Case, Contribution to "EUROVAL - An European Initiative on Validation of CFD Codes" , 1993 .

[166]  Lars Davidson LESFOIL : large eddy simulation of flow around a high lift airfoil : results of the project LESFOIL, supported by the European Union 1998-2001 , 2003 .

[167]  A. Velazquez,et al.  EARSM finite element solver for the study of turbulent 3-D compressible separated flows , 2000 .

[168]  Philip K. Lawrence,et al.  Strategic Issues in European Aerospace , 1998 .

[169]  Arthur Rizzi,et al.  Toward Establishing Credibility in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations , 1998 .

[170]  David Kokan,et al.  Application of MD0 to Large Subsonic Transport Aircraft , 2000 .

[171]  L. Paparone,et al.  Automatic local grid refinementd for multiblock solvers , 1996 .

[172]  M. Stettner,et al.  COUPLED STATIC AND DYNAMIC AEROELASTIC SIMULATIONS IN TRANSONIC AND SUPERSONIC FLOW , 2000 .

[173]  W. Rodi A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses , 1976 .

[174]  Pasquale Cinnella,et al.  Analysis of preconditioning methods for the Euler equations , 1999 .

[175]  V. Selmin,et al.  UNIFIED CONSTRUCTION OF FINITE ELEMENT AND FINITE VOLUME DISCRETIZATIONS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS , 1996 .

[176]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Prediction of high lift: review of present CFD capability , 2002 .

[177]  Arne V. Johansson,et al.  An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[178]  Michael B. Bieterman,et al.  Practical considerations in aerodynamic design optimization , 1995 .

[179]  A. M. Cunningham,et al.  Transonic Wind Tunnel Investigation of Limit Cycle Oscillations on Fighter Type Wings , 1992 .

[180]  W. Mulder A high-resolution Euler solver based on multigrid, semi-coarsening, and defective correction , 1992 .

[181]  M. Delanaye,et al.  ALL HEXAHEDRA UNSTRUCTURED GRID GENERATION , 2000 .

[182]  Kumar Ajay,et al.  Future Challenges and Opportunities in Aerodynamics , 2000 .