Doppler-determined peak systolic tricuspid pressure gradient in persons with normal pulmonary function and tricuspid regurgitation.

The Doppler-estimated peak systolic tricuspid pressure gradient is the most reliable noninvasive method for the evaluation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Our goal was to evaluate the range of this gradient in healthy persons and determine a normal upper limit. We studied 53 healthy persons (34 women, 19 men; aged 14 to 55 years, mean 38.9 +/- 12.7 years) who did not smoke and who had an adequate Doppler signal of tricuspid regurgitation. The presence of pulmonary or cardiac disorders was excluded by a review of the subject's medical history in addition to physical examination, spirometry, arterial blood gasses determination, electrocardiography, chest x-ray examination, and rest echocardiography. Tricuspid gradient ranged from 12.6 to 29. 3 mm Hg (mean 19.3 +/- 4.0); 35.8% of patients had values higher than 20 mm Hg. In conclusion, a tricuspid gradient of 30 mm Hg may be considered as the upper normal limit. The different approaches for estimating mean right atrial pressure are also discussed.

[1]  M. Rubenfire,et al.  Range of tricuspid regurgitation velocity at rest and during exercise in normal adult men: implications for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  N. Schiller,et al.  Sonospirometry: a new method for noninvasive estimation of mean right atrial pressure based on two-dimensional echographic measurements of the inferior vena cava during measured inspiration. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  D J Hagler,et al.  Comparison of three Doppler ultrasound methods in the prediction of pulmonary artery pressure. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  N. Reichek,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  A. Van Tosh,et al.  Quantitative assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  A. Miller,et al.  Standardized lung function testing. , 1984, Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire.

[8]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Recommendations Regarding Quantitation in M-Mode Echocardiography: Results of a Survey of Echocardiographic Measurements , 1978, Circulation.

[9]  William Grossman,et al.  Cardiac catheterization and angiography , 1974 .

[10]  K. Mellemgaard The alveolar-arterial oxygen difference: its size and components in normal man. , 1966, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.