Automated brain state identification using graph embedding

The functional activation pattern within the human brain is known to change at varying time-scales. This existence of and dynamics between inherently different brain functional states are found to be related to human learning, behavior, and development, and, are therefore of high importance. Yet, tools to automatically identify such cognitive states are limited. In this study, we consider high-dimensional functional connectome data constructed from BOLD fMRI over short time-intervals as a graph, each time-point as a node, and the similarity between two time-points as the edge between those two nodes. We apply graph embedding techniques to automatically extract clusters of time-points, which represent canonical brain states. Application of graph embedding technique to BOLD fMRI time-series of a population comprised of autistic and neurotypical subjects demonstrates that two-layer embedding by preserving the higherorder similarity between different time-points is crucial toward successful identification of low-dimensional brain functional states. Finally, the present study reveals inherent existence of two brain meta-states within human brain.

[1]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[2]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  Mingzhe Wang,et al.  LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding , 2015, WWW.

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[5]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Image Manifolds by Semidefinite Programming , 2004, CVPR.

[6]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[7]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Temporal metastates are associated with differential patterns of time-resolved connectivity, network topology, and attention , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Wenwu Zhu,et al.  Structural Deep Network Embedding , 2016, KDD.

[9]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange: Towards Large-Scale Evaluation of the Intrinsic Brain Architecture in Autism , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.

[10]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Feiping Nie,et al.  Cauchy Graph Embedding , 2011, ICML.

[12]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Is Not Only Lower but Different in Schizophrenia: A Combined Anatomical and Functional Approach , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[15]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[17]  Maryam Falahpour,et al.  Underconnected, But Not Broken? Dynamic Functional Connectivity MRI Shows Underconnectivity in Autism Is Linked to Increased Intra-Individual Variability Across Time , 2016, Brain Connect..

[18]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Brain state flexibility accompanies motor-skill acquisition , 2017, NeuroImage.

[19]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Hogwild: A Lock-Free Approach to Parallelizing Stochastic Gradient Descent , 2011, NIPS.

[20]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[21]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.