Small Caliber Vascular Grafts. Part II: Polyurethanes Revisited

Polyurethanes are considered to be one of the most bio- and blood-compatible biomaterials known today. By intelligent utilization of principles governing the structure/property relationship of these polymers, one can generate systems which resemble, in principle, the physical-mechanical behavior of living tissue. Thus, it is not surprising that these materials played a major role in development of small caliber vascular grafts targeted for vascular access, peripheral and coronary artery bypass indications. Numerous technologies, often esoteric in nature, were and are utilized to generate porous, potentially multilayered conduits possessing some or many characteristics of natural blood vessels. Properties such as durability, elasticity, compliance, pulsatility, and propensity for healing became attainable via polyurethanes. Furthermore, additional surface and/or bulk modification via attachments of biologically active species such as anticoagulants, cell proliferation suppressants, anti-infective compounds or biorecognizable groups are possible due to reactive groups which are part of the polyurethane structure. These modifications are designed to control or mediate host acceptance and healing of the graft. Finally, a myriad of practical processing technologies are used to fabricate functional grafts. Among those, casting, electrostatic and wet spinning of fibers and monofilaments, extrusion, dip coating or spraying of mandrels with polymer/additive solutions are often coupled with chemical-potential-difference-driven coagulation and phase inversion leading to grafts feeling and often behaving like natural vessels. Historically, the first polyurethanes utilized were hydrolytically unstable polyester polyurethanes containing hydrolysis-prone polyester polyols as soft segments, followed by hydrolytically stable but oxidation sensitive polyether polyols based polyurethanes. Polyether-based polyurethanes and their clones containing silicone and other modifying polymeric intermediates represented significant progress. Many viable technologies were discovered and developed using polyether-based polyurethanes. Chronic in vivo instability observed on prolonged implantation became, however, a major roadblock. The path led finally to the use of hydrolytically and oxidatively stable polycarbonate polyols as the soft segment to generate biodurable materials with resistance to biodegradation adequate for vascular access or perhaps peripheral graft indications. This biodurability needs to be further increased in order to utilize the full potential of polyurethanes in development of patent small caliber graft. Modification of both the soft and hard segments needs to be considered in order to maximize biodurability of both basic building blocks of the polyurethane. This paper reviews the achievements, discusses trends, and offers the view of the future in this exciting area of material/device combination.

[1]  P Couvreur,et al.  Implant Materials in Biofunction: Advances in Biomaterials 8, Editors: C. de Putter, G.L. Lange, K. de Groot and A.J.C. Lee Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pp 522, DFL 365.00 , 1989 .

[2]  D Annis,et al.  An elastomeric vascular prosthesis. , 1978, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[3]  F. E. Critchfield,et al.  Thermoplastic urethane elastomers. III. Effects of variations in isocyanate structure , 1975 .

[4]  W S Pierce,et al.  Segmented Polyurethane: A New Elastomer for Biomedical Applications , 1967, Science.

[5]  A. Jaretzki,et al.  The use of tubes constructed from vinyon "N" cloth in bridging arterial defects. , 1952, Annals of surgery.

[6]  S. Cooper,et al.  Measurement of transient thrombus deposition on polymeric materials. , 1979, Thrombosis research.

[7]  T. Okano,et al.  Blood compatibility of SPUU-PEO-heparin graft copolymers. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Endothelial seeding of compliant polyurethane vascular graft material , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  S. Williams,et al.  Formation of a multilayer cellular lining on a polyurethane vascular graft following endothelial cell sodding. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  Engelbert Pechhold,et al.  A New Investigation of Tetrahydrofuran-Based Polyether Glycols in Urethane Elastomers , 1980 .

[11]  R C Eberhart,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of small-diameter vascular prostheses. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  C. S. Schollenberger,et al.  Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomer Melt Polymerization Study , 1982 .

[13]  L. Morbitzer,et al.  Correlations between chemical structure, stress‐induced crystallization, and deformation behavior of polyurethane elastomers , 1972 .

[14]  D. J. Dempsey,et al.  Development of an Aliphatic Biomedical-Grade Polyurethane Elastomer , 1983 .

[15]  R. M. Gerkin,et al.  Polyether‐based thermoplastic polyurethanes. I. Effect of the hard‐segment content , 1979 .

[16]  D. Lyman,et al.  Compliance as a factor effecting the patency of a copolyurethane vascular graft. , 1978, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  M. Kodama,et al.  Porous polyurethane vascular prostheses with variable compliances. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  K Stokes,et al.  Polyether polyurethanes for implantable pacemaker leads. , 1982, Biomaterials.

[19]  Jiri E. Kresta,et al.  Reaction Injection Molding and Fast Polymerization Reactions , 1982 .

[20]  C. S. Schollenberger,et al.  Thermoplastic Urethane Chemical Crosslinking Effects , 1975 .

[21]  A. M. Reed,et al.  A Solution Grade Biostable Polyurethane Elastomer: ChronoFlex® AR , 1994, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[22]  Small diameter polyurethane-polydimethylsiloxane vascular prostheses made by a spraying, phase-inversion process , 1992 .

[23]  T Kolff,et al.  Copolyether-urethanes as materials for artificial hearts. , 1973, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.

[24]  T V How,et al.  The elastic properties of a polyurethane arterial prosthesis. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Y. Ito,et al.  In vitro platelet adhesion and in vivo antithrombogenicity of heparinized polyetherurethaneureas. , 1988, Biomaterials.

[26]  L. J. Brossollet Mechanical Issues in Vascular Grafting: A Review , 1992, The International journal of artificial organs.

[27]  W. R. Johnson,et al.  Conformational stress and anastomotic hyperplasia. , 1984, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  L Pinchuk,et al.  A review of the biostability and carcinogenicity of polyurethanes in medicine and the new generation of 'biostable' polyurethanes. , 1994, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[29]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Design Considerations for a Small Bore Vascular Prosthesis , 1988, The International journal of artificial organs.

[30]  D. Lyman,et al.  Predicting the compliance of small diameter vascular grafts from uniaxial tensile tests. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  R E Baier,et al.  Surface and bulk characteristics of a polyether urethane for artificial hearts. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Porous polyurethane tubes as vascular graft. , 1993, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[33]  G. Wilson,et al.  A novel process for the manufacturing of porous grafts: process description and product evaluation. , 1983, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[34]  R. Larsson,et al.  A new non-thrombogenic surface prepared by selective covalent binding of heparin via a modified reducing terminal residue. , 1983, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.

[35]  N. Schneider,et al.  Transition behavior and phase segregation in TDI polyurethanes , 1977 .

[36]  W. Quist,et al.  Development of a Microporous Compliant Small Bore Vascular Graft , 1995, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[37]  G L'Italien,et al.  Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. , 1987, Journal of vascular surgery.

[38]  C. Dennis,et al.  Fundamentals of vascular grafting , 1963 .

[39]  R. Barbucci,et al.  Conformation of human plasma proteins at polymer surfaces: the effectiveness of surface heparinization. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[40]  C. Pande Thermoplastic Polyurethanes as Insulating Materials for Long‐Life Cardiac Pacing Leads , 1983, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[41]  M Szycher,et al.  SPYROFLEX™: A Tryptosorbent Wound Dressing and Wound Closure , 1992, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[42]  Stuart L. Cooper,et al.  Polyurethanes In Medicine , 1986 .

[43]  H. Planck,et al.  Polyurethanes in Biomedical Engineering , 1984 .

[44]  R. M. Gerkin,et al.  Polyether Based Thermoplastic Polyurethanes Effect of the Soft Segment Molecular Weight , 1980 .

[45]  J W Boretos,et al.  Segmented polyurethane: a polyether polymer, II. Two years experience. , 1971, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  John W. Boretos,et al.  Past, present and future role of polyurethanes for surgical implants , 1980 .

[47]  Elastic response of filament wound arterial prostheses under internal pressure. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[48]  Stuart L. Cooper,et al.  Properties of linear elastomeric polyurethanes , 1966 .

[49]  R J Zdrahala,et al.  Softening of Thermoplastic Polyurethanes: A Structure/Property Study , 1987, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[50]  Stuart L. Cooper,et al.  Effect of segment size and polydispersity on the properties of polyurethane block polymers , 1973 .

[51]  Richard J. Zdrahala,et al.  Thermoplastic Polyurethanes Softening in 37°C N-Saline , 1985 .

[52]  W. Quist,et al.  A Mechanism of Failure in Dacron(r) Arterial Grafts , 1983 .

[53]  C. Wright Vascular grafting: Clinical applications and techniques , 1983 .

[54]  A. M. Reed,et al.  Mitrathane. A new polyether urethane urea for critical medical application. , 1984, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.