Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects

The main purpose of our study is to analyze the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on firm performance, notably by building on the business value of AI-based transformation projects. This study was conducted using a four-step sequential approach: (1) analysis of AI and AI concepts/technologies; (2) in-depth exploration of case studies from a great number of industrial sectors; (3) data collection from the databases (websites) of AI-based solution providers; and (4) a review of AI literature to identify their impact on the performance of organizations while highlighting the business value of AI-enabled projects transformation within organizations.,This study has called on the theory of IT capabilities to seize the influence of AI business value on firm performance (at the organizational and process levels). The research process (responding to the research question, making discussions, interpretations and comparisons, and formulating recommendations) was based on a review of 500 case studies from IBM, AWS, Cloudera, Nvidia, Conversica, Universal Robots websites, etc. Studying the influence of AI on the performance of organizations, and more specifically, of the business value of such organizations’ AI-enabled transformation projects, required us to make an archival data analysis following the three steps, namely the conceptual phase, the refinement and development phase, and the assessment phase.,AI covers a wide range of technologies, including machine translation, chatbots and self-learning algorithms, all of which can allow individuals to better understand their environment and act accordingly. Organizations have been adopting AI technological innovations with a view to adapting to or disrupting their ecosystem while developing and optimizing their strategic and competitive advantages. AI fully expresses its potential through its ability to optimize existing processes and improve automation, information and transformation effects, but also to detect, predict and interact with humans. Thus, the results of our study have highlighted such AI benefits in organizations, and more specifically, its ability to improve on performance at both the organizational (financial, marketing and administrative) and process levels. By building on these AI attributes, organizations can, therefore, enhance the business value of their transformed projects. The same results also showed that organizations achieve performance through AI capabilities only when they use their features/technologies to reconfigure their processes.,AI obviously influences the way businesses are done today. Therefore, practitioners and researchers need to consider AI as a valuable support or even a pilot for a new business model. For the purpose of our study, we adopted a research framework geared toward a more inclusive and comprehensive approach so as to better account for the intangible benefits of AI within organizations. In terms of interest, this study nurtures a scientific interest, which aims at proposing a model for analyzing the influence of AI on the performance of organizations, and at the same time, filling the associated gap in the literature. As for the managerial interest, our study aims to provide managers with elements to be reconfigured or added in order to take advantage of the full benefits of AI, and therefore improve organizations’ performance, the profitability of their investments in AI transformation projects, and some competitive advantage. This study also allows managers to consider AI not as a single technology but as a set/combination of several different configurations of IT in the various company’s business areas because multiple key elements must be brought together to ensure the success of AI: data, talent mix, domain knowledge, key decisions, external partnerships and scalable infrastructure.,This article analyses case studies on the reuse of secondary data from AI deployment reports in organizations. The transformation of projects based on the use of AI focuses mainly on business process innovations and indirectly on those occurring at the organizational level. Thus, 500 case studies are being examined to provide significant and tangible evidence about the business value of AI-based projects and the impact of AI on firm performance. More specifically, this article, through these case studies, exposes the influence of AI at both the organizational and process performance levels, while considering it not as a single technology but as a set/combination of the several different configurations of IT in various industries.

[1]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Predictive Active Steering Control for Autonomous Vehicle Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[3]  John McCarthy,et al.  Artificial Intelligence, Logic and Formalizing Common Sense , 1989 .

[4]  David Wiljer,et al.  Developing an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Health Care Practice: Rewiring Health Care Professions for Better Care. , 2019, Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences.

[5]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  Artificial intelligence, its impact on innovation, and the Google effect , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[6]  Varun Grover,et al.  Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Cecilia Sik Lanyi,et al.  History of Artificial Intelligence , 2009 .

[8]  Qian Huang,et al.  The impacts of IT capability on internet-enabled supply and demand process integration, and firm performance in manufacturing and services , 2015 .

[9]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  Toward a Digitally Dominant Paradigm for twenty-first century supply chain scholarship , 2019 .

[10]  Samuel Fosso Wamba,et al.  Business value of RFID-enabled healthcare transformation projects , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  Andreas M. Kaplan,et al.  A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence , 2019, California Management Review.

[12]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  P. Milner,et al.  The legacy of Donald O. Hebb: more than the Hebb Synapse , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities , 2017 .

[15]  Virginia Dignum,et al.  Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue , 2018, Ethics and Information Technology.

[16]  Daby M. Sow,et al.  IBM’s Health Analytics and Clinical Decision Support , 2014, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[17]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Intelligence artificielle : quel avenir en anatomie pathologique ? , 2019, Annales de Pathologie.

[18]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[19]  H. Koski The implications of network use, production network externalities and public networking programmes for firm's productivity , 1999 .

[20]  Adnan Khashman,et al.  Application of an emotional neural network to facial recognition , 2009, Neural Computing and Applications.

[21]  John B. Davis Neoclassicism, artificial intelligence, and the marginalization of ethics , 2005 .

[22]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  EditorialThe resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[23]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[24]  F. Lichtenberg The Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm- Level Analysis , 1993 .

[25]  Kipp W. Johnson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  Haipeng Shen,et al.  Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future , 2017, Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

[27]  Mustafa Suleyman,et al.  Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence , 2019, BMC Medicine.

[28]  Michel Lebas,et al.  Performance measurement and performance management , 1995 .

[29]  John N. Hooker,et al.  Ethical Implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution for Business and Society , 2019, Business and Society 360.

[30]  Abbas Abbaspour,et al.  The Effect of Information Technology on Organizational Structure and Firm Performance: An Analysis of Consultant Engineers Firms (CEF) in Iran☆ , 2013 .

[31]  Petr Polák,et al.  The productivity paradox: A meta-analysis , 2017, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[32]  Bernard Triomphe,et al.  How different agricultural research models contribute to impacts: Evidence from 13 case studies in developing countries , 2018, Agricultural Systems.

[33]  J. Triplett The Solow productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? , 1999 .

[34]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Internet of Things to Smart IoT Through Semantic, Cognitive, and Perceptual Computing , 2016, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[35]  Markku Kuusisto,et al.  Organizational effects of digitalization: A literature review , 2017 .

[36]  John H. Holland,et al.  Tests on a cell assembly theory of the action of the brain, using a large digital computer , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[37]  Romana Rauter,et al.  Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[38]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Bill Lehr,et al.  Information technology and its impact on firm-level productivity: evidence from government and private data sources, 1977-1993 , 1999 .

[40]  James Zhan,et al.  Chapter 2 International Production and the Digital Economy , 2018, Progress in International Business Research.

[41]  Hans-Gerd Ridder The theory contribution of case study research designs , 2017 .

[42]  Gi Mun Kim,et al.  IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Fábio Frezatti Management accounting profile of firms located in Brazil: a field study , 2005 .

[44]  Jay Lee,et al.  Industrial Artificial Intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2018, Manufacturing Letters.

[45]  John J. Mentel,et al.  Patient note deidentification using a find-and-replace iterative process. , 2005, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[46]  Sergio Verdú,et al.  Fifty Years of Shannon Theory , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[47]  Juliana Bonomi Santos,et al.  Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance , 2012 .

[48]  Nijaz Bajgoric,et al.  Information technology, knowledge management and human resource management , 2018 .

[49]  Marek Vochozka,et al.  Participating in a Highly Automated Society: How Artificial Intelligence Disrupts the Job Market , 2018 .

[50]  M.-G. Schweitzer,et al.  La Robotique développementale et l’Intelligence artificielle conduiront-elles à l’émergence de nouvelles valeurs pour l’homme ? , 2018 .

[51]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Murray Campbell,et al.  Deep Blue , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[53]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[54]  Anastassia Lauterbach Artificial intelligence and policy: quo vadis? , 2019, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance.

[55]  Evgeniy Gabrilovich,et al.  Wikipedia-based Semantic Interpretation for Natural Language Processing , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[56]  Ray J. Solomonoff,et al.  The Discovery of Algorithmic Probability , 1997, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[57]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[58]  Arun Ross,et al.  An introduction to biometric recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[59]  David F. Hendry,et al.  The computer as von Neumann planned it , 1993, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[60]  S. G. Axline,et al.  Computer-based consultations in clinical therapeutics: explanation and rule acquisition capabilities of the MYCIN system. , 1975, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[61]  Bruce G. Buchanan,et al.  A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence , 2005, AI Mag..

[62]  W. J. Hutchins,et al.  The Georgetown-IBM experiment demonstrated in January 1954 , 2004, AMTA.

[63]  Mary J. Benner Dynamic or Static Capabilities? Process Management Practices and Response to Technological Change† , 2009 .

[64]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Marcio Cardoso Machado,et al.  Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities , 2019 .

[66]  P. Sarnin,et al.  Usage des TIC et évolutions des pratiques socioprofessionnelles des cadres : quels repères pour le métier et quelles incidences sur la santé ? , 2018, Pratiques Psychologiques.

[67]  Ronald R. Kline,et al.  Cybernetics, Automata Studies, and the Dartmouth Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2011, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[68]  Yixin Zhong Structuralism? Functionalism? Behaviorism? Or mechanism? Looking for a better approach to AI , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern..

[69]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[70]  Ali Uyar,et al.  The impact of multinationality on firm value: A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[71]  T. Kijek,et al.  Is innovation the key to solving the productivity paradox? , 2018, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.

[72]  Lior Fink,et al.  Exploring the perceived business value of the flexibility enabled by information technology infrastructure , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[73]  Victoria L. Rubin,et al.  Artificially intelligent conversational agents in libraries , 2010, Libr. Hi Tech.

[74]  Ángel L. Meroño-Cerdán,et al.  Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organisational performance in small businesses , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[75]  Daniel Trabucchi,et al.  A New Path Toward a Hybrid Model , 2019, Research-Technology Management.

[76]  Nathaniel Rochester,et al.  Intelligent Behavior in Problem-Solving Machines , 1958, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[77]  Fabrizio Maria Maggi,et al.  Preface to the Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence for Business Process Management 2018 , 2020, Journal on Data Semantics.