A sensitivity analysis of a personalized pulse wave propagation model for arteriovenous fistula surgery. Part A: Identification of most influential model parameters.

Previously, a pulse wave propagation model was developed that has potential in supporting decision-making in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery for hemodialysis. To adapt the wave propagation model to personalized conditions, patient-specific input parameters should be available. In clinics, the number of measurable input parameters is limited which results in sparse datasets. In addition, patient data are compromised with uncertainty. These uncertain and incomplete input datasets will result in model output uncertainties. By means of a sensitivity analysis the propagation of input uncertainties into output uncertainty can be studied which can give directions for input measurement improvement. In this study, a computational framework has been developed to perform such a sensitivity analysis with a variance-based method and Monte Carlo simulations. The framework was used to determine the influential parameters of our pulse wave propagation model applied to AVF surgery, with respect to parameter prioritization and parameter fixing. With this we were able to determine the model parameters that have the largest influence on the predicted mean brachial flow and systolic radial artery pressure after AVF surgery. Of all 73 parameters 51 could be fixed within their measurement uncertainty interval without significantly influencing the output, while 16 parameters importantly influence the output uncertainty. Measurement accuracy improvement should thus focus on these 16 influential parameters. The most rewarding are measurement improvements of the following parameters: the mean aortic flow, the aortic windkessel resistance, the parameters associated with the smallest arterial or venous diameters of the AVF in- and outflow tract and the radial artery windkessel compliance.

[1]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[2]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[3]  F N van de Vosse,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of a wave propagation model for arm arteries. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[5]  J. Wenk Numerical modeling of stress in stenotic arteries with microcalcifications: a parameter sensitivity study. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[7]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[8]  M. Robbin,et al.  Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. , 2002, Kidney international.

[9]  W Huberts,et al.  A pulse wave propagation model to support decision-making in vascular access planning in the clinic. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  I. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Measures, ANOVA-like Techniques and the Use of Bootstrap , 1997 .

[11]  T. How,et al.  Factors associated with early failure of arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis access. , 1996, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[12]  Fabrice Gamboa,et al.  Local Polynomial Estimation for Sensitivity Analysis on Models With Correlated Inputs , 2008, Technometrics.

[13]  David P Wilson,et al.  Sampling and sensitivity analyses tools (SaSAT) for computational modelling , 2008, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[14]  Runze Li,et al.  Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments , 2005 .

[15]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[16]  F. M. van der Sande,et al.  Prospective evaluation of failure modes in autogenous radiocephalic wrist access for haemodialysis. , 2003, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[17]  A. Guyton,et al.  Textbook of Medical Physiology , 1961 .

[18]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[19]  K. Leunissen,et al.  Arterial wall properties in patients with renal failure. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[20]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Forearm cephalic vein cross-sectional area changes at incremental congestion pressures: towards a standardized and reproducible vein mapping protocol. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A state of the art review on intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[22]  N. Westerhof,et al.  An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  Luca Antiga,et al.  Clinical Study Protocol for the ARCH Project Computational Modeling for Improvement of Outcome after Vascular Access Creation , 2011, The journal of vascular access.

[24]  P R Hoskins,et al.  Blood vessel diameter measurement by ultrasound. , 1993, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Young Soo Kim,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of intima-media thickness of radial artery in pre-dialysis uraemic patients: comparison with histological examination. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[26]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: Description of techniques , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Arnold P G Hoeks,et al.  Shear stress depends on vascular territory: comparison between common carotid and brachial artery. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  C. Meier,et al.  Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  Parametric uncertainty analysis of pulse wave propagation in a model of a human arterial network , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[30]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  J H M Tordoir,et al.  Upper extremity ischemia and hemodialysis vascular access. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[32]  Wouter Wieling,et al.  Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. , 2009, American journal of hypertension.

[33]  Julien Jacques,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated inputs , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[35]  Wouter Huberts,et al.  A lumped model for blood flow and pressure in the systemic arteries based on an approximate velocity profile function. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[36]  J.H.M. Tordoir,et al.  Patient-specific computational modeling to improve the clinical outcome of vascular access creation , 2009 .

[37]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[38]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[39]  David S. Sumner,et al.  Hemodynamics for surgeons , 1975 .

[40]  Vera Novak,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and Model Assessment: Mathematical Models for Arterial Blood Flow and Blood Pressure , 2008, Cardiovascular engineering.

[41]  M. Malovrh Native arteriovenous fistula: preoperative evaluation. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[42]  K. Konner The anastomosis of the arteriovenous fistula--common errors and their avoidance. , 2002, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[43]  J. Tordoir,et al.  European guidelines for vascular access: clinical algorithms on vascular access for haemodialysis. , 2003, EDTNA/ERCA journal.

[44]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  A general first-order global sensitivity analysis method , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[45]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[46]  Kathleen Mullen,et al.  Brachial Artery Elastic Mechanics in Patients With Heart Failure , 2001, Hypertension.