Spectrum of Cytogenomic Abnormalities Revealed by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on Products of Conception Culture Failure and Normal Karyotype Samples.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Peining Li | A. Diadamo | Qinghua Zhou | Peining Li | Qinghua Zhou | Shen-Yin Wu | Katherine Amato | Autumn DiAdamo | K. Amato | Shen-Yin Wu
[1] D. Ledbetter,et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] C. Sismani,et al. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations , 2010, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[3] Bixia Xiang,et al. CytoAccess, a relational laboratory information management system for a clinical cytogenetics laboratory. , 2006, Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists.
[4] M. Sauer. Infertility and Early Pregnancy Loss Is Largely Due to Oocyte Aging, Not Uterine Senescence, as Demonstrated by Oocyte Donation , 1997, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[5] Leslie G Biesecker,et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.
[6] J. Vermeesch,et al. Cytogenetic and morphological analysis of early products of conception following hystero‐embryoscopy from couples with recurrent pregnancy loss , 2012, Prenatal diagnosis.
[7] S. South,et al. Analytical and Clinical Validity Study of FirstStepDx PLUS: A Chromosomal Microarray Optimized for Patients with Neurodevelopmental Conditions , 2016, bioRxiv.
[8] D. Warburton,et al. The relationship between maternal age and chromosome size in autosomal trisomy. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.
[9] M. Botcherby,et al. Diagnostic utility of novel combined arrays for genome-wide simultaneous detection of aneuploidy and uniparental isodisomy in losses of pregnancy , 2014, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[10] Marilyn M. Li,et al. Genome-wide oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for etiological diagnosis of mental retardation: a multicenter experience of 1499 clinical cases. , 2010, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[11] M. Qumsiyeh,et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first‐trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro , 2005, Prenatal diagnosis.
[12] M. Herbert,et al. Meiosis and maternal aging: insights from aneuploid oocytes and trisomy births. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[13] E. Hook. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. , 1977, American journal of human genetics.
[14] J. Dungan. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: Benefits and pitfalls , 2010 .
[15] A. Lippman‐Hand,et al. Maternal-age effect in aneuploidy: does altered embryonic selection play a role? , 1982, American journal of human genetics.
[16] Fang Xu,et al. Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[17] Marilyn M. Li,et al. Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue , 2014, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.
[18] Jian-sheng Xie,et al. Genetic analysis of first‐trimester miscarriages with a combination of cytogenetic karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and arrayCGH , 2009, Clinical genetics.
[19] L. Hudgins,et al. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.
[20] K. Hirschhorn,et al. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: New insights from a 12-year study , 2005, Genetics in Medicine.
[21] M. Sousa,et al. An efficient protocol for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous miscarriages or foetal deaths. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[22] Abnormalities in spontaneous abortions detected by G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at a national reference laboratory , 2014, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[23] D. Warburton,et al. Biological aging and the etiology of aneuploidy , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.
[24] Clarice R. Weinberg,et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.
[25] K. Sankaranarayanan. The role of non-disjunction in aneuploidy in man. An overview. , 1979, Mutation research.
[26] Hongyu Zhao,et al. Analytical and clinical validity of whole‐genome oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for pediatric patients with mental retardation and developmental delay , 2008, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[27] H. Rehder,et al. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)–Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions , 2001, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[28] I. Lebedev,et al. Features of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion cell culture failures detected by interphase FISH analysis , 2004, European Journal of Human Genetics.
[29] N. de Leeuw,et al. Best diagnostic approach for the genetic evaluation of fetuses after intrauterine death in first, second or third trimester: QF-PCR, karyotyping and/or genome wide SNP array analysis , 2014, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[30] D. Ledbetter,et al. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.
[31] M. van Wely,et al. Genetics of early miscarriage. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[32] N. Niikawa,et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis in first‐trimester spontaneous abortions with ‘normal’ karyotypes , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[33] A. Brothman,et al. Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Genetic Evaluation of Fetal Loss Between 10 and 20 Weeks of Gestation , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[34] M. Qumsiyeh,et al. Cytogenetics and mechanisms of spontaneous abortions: increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation in chromosomally abnormal villi , 2000, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.
[35] Fang Xu,et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses for prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities , 2014, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[36] Huntington F. Willard,et al. Thompson & Thompson Genetics in Medicine , 2007 .
[37] V. Schulz,et al. Cytogenomic mapping and bioinformatic mining reveal interacting brain expressed genes for intellectual disability , 2014, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[38] Yuan Wei,et al. Technology-driven and evidence-based genomic analysis for integrated pediatric and prenatal genetics evaluation. , 2013, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.
[39] K. Buysse,et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples , 2009, BMC Medical Genetics.
[40] A. Diadamo,et al. Changes in and Efficacies of Indications for Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenomic Abnormalities: 13 Years of Experience in a Single Center , 2015, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.
[41] Jinsong Gao,et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion , 2012, Molecular Cytogenetics.
[42] S. Cavani,et al. First-trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH , 2013, Journal of Applied Genetics.
[43] James H. Crichton,et al. Oocyte development, meiosis and aneuploidy , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[44] Grier P Page,et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.