Decomposition analysis for assessing the United States 2025 emissions target: how big is the challenge?

The United States (US) - the second largest greenhouse gases (GHGs) emitter in the world – has recently pledged a reduction of net GHGs emissions by 26–28% below its 2005 level by 2025. How big is the challenge for the country to achieve this target in terms of its present emissions profile, recent historical trends and the contributions to those trends from key proximate factors contributing to emissions? In this paper we make quantitative judgement of the challenge by using decomposition analysis. Based on the analysis and the contributions of the key drivers of energy-related CO2 emissions in the recent past, it appears that it will be quite a challenging task for the government to achieve the recently announced 2025 target. More specifically, to achieve it, the combined average annual mitigating contribution from energy efficiency, carbon intensity of energy improvements and continued structural change in the US economy away from emissions-intensive activities will need to be at least 33% higher, and depending on the extent of continued structural change in the US economy in the future, may even need to be as much as 42% higher than was apparently the case during the 2000 – 12 period.

[1]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies , 2013 .

[2]  Kemal Sarica,et al.  Alternative policy impacts on US GHG emissions and energy security: A hybrid modeling approach , 2013 .

[3]  I. Wing,et al.  THE SPATIOTEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF U.S. CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: STYLIZED FACTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CLIMATE POLICY , 2013 .

[4]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  US long-term energy intensity: Backcast and projection , 2006 .

[5]  Allan P. Layton,et al.  Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis , 2015 .

[6]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions , 2012 .

[7]  Eric G. O'Rear,et al.  Analysis of impacts of alternative policies aimed at increasing US energy independence and reducing GHG emissions , 2015 .

[8]  I. Wing,et al.  The implications of the historical decline in US energy intensity for long-run CO2 emission projections , 2007 .

[9]  Shonali Pachauri,et al.  Household electricity access a trivial contributor to CO 2 emissions growth in India , 2014 .

[10]  David I. Stern,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Short Run: The Rate and Sources of Economic Growth Matter , 2015 .

[11]  I. Fisher,et al.  The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of Their Varieties, Tests, and Reliability , 1923 .

[12]  R. Socolow,et al.  Understanding Long-Term Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the USA , 2006 .

[13]  Yrjo Ideal Log-change Index Numbers , 2016 .

[14]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  Energy efficiency in South Africa : a decomposition exercise , 2012 .

[15]  Sujit Das,et al.  Reducing GHG emissions in the United States' transportation sector , 2011 .

[16]  W. Ross Morrow,et al.  Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the US transportation sector , 2010 .

[17]  Jining Chen,et al.  Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957–2000 , 2005 .

[18]  Richard K. Lester,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Proposed Carbon Emission Reductions on the U.S. Energy Infrastructure , 2009 .

[19]  K. Hubacek,et al.  Lifestyles, technology and CO2 emissions in China: A regional comparative analysis , 2009 .

[20]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2000 .

[21]  Kazuo Sato The Ideal Log-Change Index Number , 1976 .

[22]  Shahiduzzaman,et al.  Changes in energy efficiency in Australia: A decomposition of aggregate energy intensity using logarithmic mean Divisia approach , 2013 .

[23]  D. Stern,et al.  China's Changing Energy Intensity Trend: A Decomposition Analysis , 2008 .

[24]  Ian Sue Wing,et al.  Explaining the declining energy intensity of the U.S. economy , 2008 .

[25]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Comparison of the evolution of energy intensity in Spain and in the EU15. Why is Spain different , 2010 .

[26]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method? , 2004 .