J un 2 01 7 BAYESIAN FORMULATIONS OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL BARCODE INVERSION

Abstract. A pair of Bayesian approaches to the reconstruction of binary functions in R, d = 2, 3, is adopted; one is based on a Ginzburg-Landau penalized Gaussian prior, the other on a Bayesian level set formulation. For the Ginzburg-Landau approach a link is made to classical methods based on least squares constrained to piecewise constant functions, with a total variation regularization term which penalizes interfaces. This link rests on a careful choice, and scaling with respect to noise amplitude, of the prior and of the Ginzburg-Landau penalty. The key technical tool used to establish links between the Bayesian and classical approaches is the use of Γ−limits to study the MAP estimator. Furthermore, the parameter choices and scalings are shown, by means of numerical experiments, to lead to posterior concentration around a point which adequately encapsulates the truth. However, the Bayesian level set method is also shown to produce reconstructions of similar quality, at considerably lower computational cost, suggesting that the Bayesian level set method may be a viable alternative to total variation regularization for certain problems. The numerical studies are conducted using function-space MCMC.

[1]  Marco A. Iglesias,et al.  A Bayesian Level Set Method for Geometric Inverse Problems , 2015, 1504.00313.

[2]  David Duvenaud,et al.  Probabilistic ODE Solvers with Runge-Kutta Means , 2014, NIPS.

[3]  M. Burger,et al.  Maximum a posteriori estimates in linear inverse problems with log-concave priors are proper Bayes estimators , 2014, 1402.5297.

[4]  Philipp Hennig,et al.  Probabilistic Interpretation of Linear Solvers , 2014, SIAM J. Optim..

[5]  C. M. Elliott,et al.  Phase Field Methods for Binary Recovery , 2013, 1310.4781.

[6]  M. Girolami,et al.  Bayesian Solution Uncertainty Quantification for Differential Equations , 2013 .

[7]  A. Stuart,et al.  MAP estimators and their consistency in Bayesian nonparametric inverse problems , 2013, 1303.4795.

[8]  A. Stuart,et al.  The Bayesian Approach to Inverse Problems , 2013, 1302.6989.

[9]  G. Roberts,et al.  MCMC Methods for Functions: ModifyingOld Algorithms to Make Them Faster , 2012, 1202.0709.

[10]  A. Stuart,et al.  Spectral gaps for a Metropolis–Hastings algorithm in infinite dimensions , 2011, 1112.1392.

[11]  Andrew M. Stuart,et al.  Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective , 2010, Acta Numerica.

[12]  M. Lassas,et al.  Hierarchical models in statistical inverse problems and the Mumford–Shah functional , 2009, 0908.3396.

[13]  Matti Lassas. Eero Saksman,et al.  Discretization-invariant Bayesian inversion and Besov space priors , 2009, 0901.4220.

[14]  G. Roberts,et al.  MCMC methods for diffusion bridges , 2008 .

[15]  Daniela Calvetti,et al.  Hypermodels in the Bayesian imaging framework , 2008 .

[16]  Daniela Calvetti,et al.  A Gaussian hypermodel to recover blocky objects , 2007 .

[17]  Faming Liang,et al.  Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems , 2006, Technometrics.

[18]  D. Hilhorst,et al.  Γ-limit for the extended Fisher–Kolmogorov equation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[19]  D. Mumford,et al.  Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems , 1989 .

[20]  L. Fleischer Regularization Of Inverse Problems , 2016 .

[21]  Klaus Ritter,et al.  Bayesian numerical analysis , 2000 .

[22]  J. Skilling Bayesian Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations , 1992 .

[23]  S. Gupta,et al.  Statistical decision theory and related topics IV , 1988 .