First capture success in two dimensions: The search for prey by a random walk predator in a comprehensive space of random walks

Abstract Random walk models are an important tool used for understanding how complex organisms redistribute themselves through space and time in search of targets such as food, shelter, or mates. These walks are easily studied with agent-based models, which can be used to ask which search strategy is best according to some efficiency metric. Current studies however, generally do not consider the full range of potential random walks, success metrics, and constraints on the walker, and implementation details vary widely. It is therefore difficult to compare results across studies. In this paper, we investigate predator search behaviour in a comprehensive space of key movement variables that allows the predator to select from a continuum of random walks ranging from Brownian walks (BWs) to correlated random walks (CorRWs) which include directional persistence, to composite random walks (ComRWs) which feature intensive and extensive search modes (ISMs and ESMs), and finally to more complex correlated composite random walks (CCRWs). We specifically focus on the search behaviour of a predator between the initiation of a search for a prey item and the first successful acquisition of a prey target: we call this interval the “search-to-capture” event. We measure the predator's success against three metrics of energetic cost: (1) the time elapsed, (2) the distance travelled, and (3) an equally weighted combination of time and distance. In addition, we explore the effect of three different constraints on the predator: (1) hunting success in the extensive search mode, (2) detection radius when in the extensive search mode, and (3) prey density. Our work confirms the broadly held notion that CCRW movement patterns should always outperform BWs, but find instructive cases where other walks are superior. We also show that, within the CCRW category, there is a wide range of possible walks and rank these according to measures of energetic cost. Our work also offers insights into the evolutionary pressures surrounding the “search-to-capture” event, and suggests that CCRW predators with low hunting success in one movement mode experience higher evolutionary pressures and are thus more likely to adopt a nearly optimal random walk. Our work highlights the need for comprehensive studies that examine several aspects of random walks simultaneously.

[1]  A. James,et al.  Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: Ballistic versus Lévy versus Brownian strategies. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Toshinori Okuyama,et al.  Flexible components of functional responses. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[3]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[4]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models in biology , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  E. Merrill,et al.  The influence of snow on the functional response of grazing ungulates , 2012 .

[6]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Foraging : behavior and ecology , 2007 .

[7]  G. Pyke Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[8]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[9]  Shuichi Matsumura,et al.  Foraging on spatially distributed resources with sub‐optimal movement, imperfect information, and travelling costs: departures from the ideal free distribution , 2010 .

[10]  A. Houston,et al.  Integrating function and mechanism. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  R. Spiteri,et al.  How linear features alter predator movement and the functional response , 2012, Interface Focus.

[12]  G. Hays,et al.  Movement Patterns for a Critically Endangered Species, the Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), Linked to Foraging Success and Population Status , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  P. Coquillard,et al.  Optimal within-patch movement strategies for optimising patch residence time: an agent-based modelling approach , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Samuel M Flaxman,et al.  Generalized Movement Strategies for Constrained Consumers: Ignoring Fitness Can Be Adaptive , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[15]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses , 1996, Nature.

[16]  Toshinori Okuyama,et al.  Local interactions between predators and prey call into question commonly used functional responses , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew S. Knell,et al.  Classifying area-restricted search (ARS) using a partial sum approach , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[18]  O Bénichou,et al.  Robustness of optimal intermittent search strategies in one, two, and three dimensions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  O. Bénichou,et al.  Optimizing intermittent reaction paths. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[21]  S. Benhamou HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK , 2007 .

[22]  S. Redner A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[23]  E. Merrill,et al.  Time‐to‐kill: measuring attack rates in a heterogenous landscape with multiple prey types , 2012 .

[24]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Beyond Optimal Searching: Recent Developments in the Modelling of Animal Movement Patterns as Lévy Walks , 2013 .

[25]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[26]  J. Houghton,et al.  Prey field switching based on preferential behaviour can induce Lévy flights , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[28]  A M Reynolds,et al.  Optimising the success of random destructive searches: Lévy walks can outperform ballistic motions. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Assessing Lévy walks as models of animal foraging , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  Paul C Bressloff,et al.  Quasi-steady-state analysis of two-dimensional random intermittent search processes. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Andrew M. Hein,et al.  Energetic and biomechanical constraints on animal migration distance. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[32]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  How interactions between animal movement and landscape processes modify local range dynamics and extinction risk , 2014, Biology Letters.

[33]  A M Reynolds,et al.  Distinguishing between Lévy walks and strong alternative models. , 2012, Ecology.

[34]  M. Thums,et al.  In situ measures of foraging success and prey encounter reveal marine habitat-dependent search strategies. , 2011, Ecology.

[35]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Lévy flight patterns are predicted to be an emergent property of a bumblebees’ foraging strategy , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  D. Pletscher,et al.  FACTORS CORRELATED WITH FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF WOLVES IN AND NEAR GLACIER NATIONAL PARK, MONTANA , 2004 .

[37]  S C F Palmer,et al.  Spatial processes can determine the relationship between prey encounter rate and prey density , 2005, Biology Letters.

[38]  Claude Loverdo,et al.  A minimal model of intermittent search in dimension two , 2007 .

[39]  Andy M. Reynolds On the intermittent behaviour of foraging animals , 2006 .

[40]  J. Calabrese,et al.  The Correlated Random Walk and the Rise of Movement Ecology , 2014 .

[41]  Brigitte Tenhumberg,et al.  Composite random search strategies based on non-directional sensory cues , 2013, 1306.5048.

[42]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[43]  R. Sibly,et al.  Representing the acquisition and use of energy by individuals in agent‐based models of animal populations , 2013 .

[44]  G. Pyke Understanding movements of organisms: it's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis , 2015 .

[45]  Arild O. Gautestad Brownian motion or Lévy walk? Stepping towards an extended statistical mechanics for animal locomotion , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[46]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[47]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  Mussels realize Weierstrassian Lévy walks as composite correlated random walks , 2014, Scientific Reports.