Rehabilitation Methods for Patients with Geographic Atrophy due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Effects of Rehabilitation on Quality of Life

Purpose The purpose of the study is to evaluate the low vision rehabilitation methods and to investigate the effect of visual rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with low vision due to geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Methods The better-seeing eye of 78 patients with geographic atrophy due to ARMD were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, ophthalmological examination findings, and preferred low vision aids for near and distant were recorded. Fifty-seven patients who preferred to use a low vision aid device in daily life were considered as a rehabilitation group, whereas 21 patients who did not use any device were considered as a control group. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) was applied to all patients at the initial examination and at least 6 months after the initial examination. Results In the rehabilitation group, statistically significant increases were found in the overall composite score, and general vision, near and distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, and dependency subscale scores of the NEI-VFQ-25 quality of life scale after low vision rehabilitation (p=0.009 for general vision, p < 0.001; for others). In the control group, there was no statistically significant change in any of the subscale scores or the overall score of the scale (p > 0.05). All patients (n = 78) were recommended to use at least one low vision aid for near vision. Hyperocular glasses were recommended for 77 patients (98.72%), magnifiers for 15 patients (19.23%), electro-optical devices for 2 patients (2.56%), and telemicroscope for one patient (1.28%). Furthermore, 17 patients (21.8%) were prescribed more than one low vision aids. However, for distance vision, only 29 patients (37.18%) received a recommendation for a low vision aid. Conclusions Low vision patients with ARMD-related geographic atrophy should meet with low vision aids as soon as possible and should be included in low vision rehabilitation programs.

[1]  M. A. Sanchez-Tena,et al.  Improvement of the Quality of Life in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration by Using Filters , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  L. D. Del Priore,et al.  Central geographic atrophy vs. neovascular age–related macular degeneration: differences in longitudinal vision-related quality of life , 2020, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg,et al.  Determinants of Quality of Life in Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration , 2020, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  F. Ziemssen,et al.  Burden of Illness in Geographic Atrophy: A Study of Vision-Related Quality of Life and Health Care Resource Use , 2020, Clinical ophthalmology.

[5]  T. Heiberg,et al.  The Impact of Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Quality of Life and Its Association With Demographic Data: Results From the NEI VFQ-25 Questionnaire in a Norwegian Population , 2018, Gerontology & geriatric medicine.

[6]  N. Bressler,et al.  Reliability and Construct Validity of the NEI VFQ-25 in a Subset of Patients With Geographic Atrophy From the Phase 2 Mahalo Study. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  H. Wilhelm,et al.  Vision-related quality of life in patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab injections in routine clinical practice: baseline data from the German OCEAN study , 2016, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[8]  R. Klein,et al.  Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The Lancet. Global health.

[9]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Validation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) in age-related macular degeneration. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Glenn J Jaffe,et al.  Semiautomated image processing method for identification and quantification of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  N. Bressler,et al.  Validation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) in age-related macular degeneration. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Rickilyn M Mancil,et al.  Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  Clare Bradley,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Quality of Life in Age-related Macular Degeneration: a Review of the Literature , 2022 .

[14]  Hüseyin Mayalı,et al.  Cross-validation of the Turkish Version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) , 2005, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[15]  C. Owsley,et al.  Vision-specific health-related quality of life in age-related maculopathy patients presenting for low vision services , 2004, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[16]  R. Klein,et al.  The impact of visual impairment and eye disease on vision-related quality of life in a Mexican-American population: proyecto VER. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  C. Browning,et al.  Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  R M Kaplan,et al.  Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[19]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  N J Rumney,et al.  Outcome of Low Vision Aid Provision: The Effectiveness of a Low Vision Clinic , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Sven Erik G. Nilsson,et al.  Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration , 1986, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[22]  Önder Üretmen,et al.  Low Vision Aids: The Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation , 2013 .

[23]  S. Markowitz,et al.  Principles of modern low vision rehabilitation. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[24]  Sandra S Stinnett,et al.  Vision-related quality of life in patients with bilateral severe age-related macular degeneration. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[25]  Gelse Beatriz Martins Monteiro,et al.  Causes of low vision and use of optical aids in the elderly. , 2004, Revista do Hospital das Clinicas.

[26]  Gordon N. Dutton,et al.  Low Vision Aids—Is our service cost effective? , 1991, Eye.

[27]  G. Thompson,et al.  Low vision aids--evaluation in a general eye department. , 1986, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.