A regional flux-based risk assessment approach for multiple contaminated sites on groundwater bodies.

In the context of the Water Framework Directive (EP and CEU, 2000), management plans have to be set up to monitor and to maintain water quality in groundwater bodies in the EU. In heavily industrialized and urbanized areas, the cumulative effect of multiple contaminant sources is likely and has to be evaluated. In order to propose adequate measures, the calculated risk should be based on criteria reflecting the risk of groundwater quality deterioration, in a cumulative manner and at the scale of the entire groundwater body. An integrated GIS- and flux-based risk assessment approach for groundwater bodies is described, with a regional scale indicator for evaluating the quality status of the groundwater body. It is based on the SEQ-ESO currently used in the Walloon Region of Belgium which defines, for different water uses and for a detailed list of groundwater contaminants, a set of threshold values reflecting the levels of water quality and degradation with respect to each contaminant. The methodology is illustrated with first results at a regional scale on a groundwater body-scale application to a contaminated alluvial aquifer which has been classified to be at risk of not reaching a good quality status by 2015. These first results show that contaminants resulting from old industrial activities in that area are likely to contribute significantly to the degradation of groundwater quality. However, further investigations are required on the evaluation of the actual polluting pressures before any definitive conclusion be established.

[1]  Paul Bardos,et al.  Sharing experiences in the management of megasites: towards a sustainable approach in land management of industrially contaminated areas. Report of the NICOLE workshop, 29-31 October 2003, Lille, France , 2004 .

[2]  Sebastian Schädler,et al.  Land-use related cost estimates for contaminated site development : consequences of uncertainty for planning and investment decisions , 2008 .

[3]  Philip J Binning,et al.  Risk assessment and prioritisation of contaminated sites on the catchment scale. , 2008, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[4]  David N Lerner,et al.  Evaluating the risks of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) pollution of urban groundwater. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[5]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[6]  Sebastian Schädler,et al.  Improving mega-site revitalisation strategies by trading off benefits from future land use and clean-up costs , 2008 .

[7]  S. Brouyère,et al.  A framework for an optimised groundwater monitoring network and aggregated indicators , 2006 .

[8]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land. , 2008, Environment international.

[9]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  DESYRE: Decision Support System for the Rehabilitation of Contaminated Megasites , 2007, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[10]  C. Zheng,et al.  A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems , 1997 .

[11]  Anna Korre,et al.  A spatially-evaluated methodology for assessing risk to a population from contaminated land. , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[12]  Neil A. Stiber,et al.  SMARTe: An MCDA Approach to Revitalize Communities and Restore the Environment , 2009 .

[13]  John L. Kittle,et al.  BASINS: Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources , 2009 .

[14]  Nigel G. Tait,et al.  Borehole Optimisation System (BOS) - A GIS based risk analysis tool for optimising the use of urban groundwater , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Jordi Batlle-Aguilar Groundwater flow and contaminant transport in an alluvial aquifer: in-situ investigation and modelling of a brownfield with strong groundwater - surface water interactions , 2009 .

[16]  Klaus Söhngen Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites , 1988 .

[17]  S. Brouyère,et al.  Benzene dispersion and natural attenuation in an alluvial aquifer with strong interactions with surface water , 2009 .

[18]  Nigel G. Tait,et al.  Borehole Optimisation System (BOS) - A case study assessing options for abstraction of urban groundwater in Nottingham, UK , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Decision Evaluation for Complex Risk Network Systems (DECERNS) Software Tool , 2009 .

[20]  Robert N. Stewart,et al.  SADA: Ecological Risk Based Decision Support System for Selective Remediation , 2009 .

[21]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Environmental Risk Assessment , 2009 .

[22]  Elena Semenzin,et al.  DSS-ERAMANIA: Decision Support System for Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites , 2009 .

[23]  R Fairman,et al.  Environmental Risk Assessment: Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources , 1998 .

[24]  T. Ptak,et al.  Monitoring groundwater contamination and delineating source zones at industrial sites: uncertainty analyses using integral pumping tests. , 2005, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[25]  M. Westlake,et al.  The Council of the European Union , 1995 .

[26]  Andrew B. Lawson Spatial Risk Assessment , 2008 .