Convexity-Based Visual Camouflage Breaking

Camouflage is frequently used by animals and humans (usually for military purposes) in order to conceal objects from visual surveillance or inspection. Most camouflage methods are based on superposing multiple edges on the object that is supposed to be hidden, such that its familiar contours and texture are masked. In this work, we present an operator, Darg, that is applied directly to the intensity image in order to detect 3D smooth convex (or equivalently: concave) objects. The operator maximally responds to a local intensity configuration that corresponds to curved 3D objects, and thus, is used to detect curved objects on a relatively flat background, regardless of image edges, contours, and texture. In that regard, we show that a typical camouflage found in some animal species seems to be a “counter measure” taken against detection that might be based on our method. Detection by Darg is shown to be very robust, from both theoretic considerations and practical examples of real-life images. As a part of the camouflage breaking demonstration, Darg, which is non-edge-based, is compared with a representative edge-based operator. Better performance is maintained by Darg for both animal and military camouflage breaking.

[1]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets? , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Detection of regions of interest and camouflage breaking by direct convexity estimation , 1998, Proceedings 1998 IEEE Workshop on Visual Surveillance.

[3]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Computer Vision , 1982 .

[4]  J. Bigun Recognition of local symmetries in gray value images by harmonic functions , 1988 .

[5]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Shading Flows and Scenel Bundles: A New Approach to Shape from Shading , 1992, ECCV.

[6]  Gregg E. Irvin,et al.  Physiologically based computational approach to camouflage and masking patterns , 1992, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Models and metrics for signature strength evaluation of camouflaged targets , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  Tomasz Jannson,et al.  Mapping-singularities-based motion estimation , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[9]  S. W. Zhang,et al.  Prior experience enhances pattern discrimination in insect vision , 1994, Nature.

[10]  Guilan Song,et al.  Method for spectral pattern recognition of color camouflage , 1997 .

[11]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[12]  Lisa B. Hepfinger Camouflage simulation and effectiveness assessment for the individual soldier , 1990, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[13]  P H T HARTLEY,et al.  Animal camouflage. , 1948, Endeavour.

[14]  Yehezkel Yeshurun,et al.  Convexity-based camouflage breaking , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[15]  Huimin Lu,et al.  The possible mechanism underlying visual anti-camouflage: a model and its real-time simulation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[16]  N. Shashar,et al.  Cuttlefish use polarization sensitivity in predation on silvery fish , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  Gerard Medioni,et al.  Model-based aircraft recognition in perspective aerial imagery , 1995, Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Vision - ISCV.

[18]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[19]  Nathan Intrator,et al.  Face detection by direct convexity estimation , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  E. Titchener,et al.  An Arraignment of the Theories of Mimicry and Warning Colors@@@Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom: An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise through Color and Pattern. Being a Summary of Abbott H. Thayer's Discoveries , 1910 .

[21]  M V Srinivasan,et al.  Camouflage by edge enhancement in animal coloration patterns and its implications for visual mechanisms , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Lawrence B. Wolff,et al.  Portable imaging polarimeters , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Georg S. Ruppert,et al.  Camouflage assessment considering human perception data , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.