Trying Harder for Different Reasons

Summary: Past investigations of performance on a conjunctive physical persistence task have yielded consistent evidence of motivation gains in the less able worker - a pattern first seen in data collected over 70 years ago (Kohler, 1926, 1927). Moreover, recent work indicates that these gains are due to the increased instrumentality of the weaker participant's efforts. The present study sought to demonstrate that another potential factor in the work context - the sex composition of the group, which is known to moderate self-presentation concerns - could also affect such motivation gains. Male and female members of work teams performed a physical persistence task. In one condition they performed work trials as individuals. In others, they first worked on the task alone and then were paired with a more capable same- or other-sexed teammate to perform the task conjunctively - i. e., this trial was over as soon as either person stopped. As expected, these less capable participants worked significantly harder ...

[1]  G Hertel,et al.  Motivation gains in performance groups: paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. , 1997 .

[3]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[4]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[5]  N. Kerr,et al.  Sex Composition of Groups and Member Motivation III: Motivational Losses at a Feminine Task , 1991 .

[6]  W. Wood,et al.  Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  N. Kerr,et al.  Role expectations in social dilemmas. Sex roles and task motivation in groups. , 1985 .

[8]  N. Kerr,et al.  Sex Composition of Groups and Member Motivation II. Effects of Relative Task Ability. , 1984 .

[9]  N. Kerr Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[10]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group sex composition and member task motivation , 1983 .

[11]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[12]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Self‐interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods , 1982 .

[13]  S. Bem The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[15]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Stereotypic Affective Properties of Personal Names and Somatotypes in Children. , 1971 .