Apparent motion: Evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process

Four stimulus elements configured as a notional diamond were flashed in pairs to elicit apparent motion. When the elements were identical (4Zs), the direction of apparent motion was ambiguous. When the elements were pairs of different letters (Cs andOs,Es andZs), letters of different sizes (Zs andzs), or oppositely oblique lines, the direction of apparent motion tended to be between identical elements. This was true, however, only for an initial, brief observation period. Subsequently, the direction of apparent motion tended to be determined by the direction of motion perceived at first, regardless of the character of the elements. This quickly established directional set (within 10 sec) largely swamped any tendency to resolve correspondence in terms of a feature of the stimulus. It appears to be based on spatial rather than retinal or egocentric coordinates.

[1]  D. Navon,et al.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Dimensions of figural identity and apparent motion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Andrew B. Watson Apparent motion occurs only between similar spatial frequencies , 1986, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Ullman The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .

[6]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual inertia in apparent motion , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Low Spatial Frequencies Dominate Apparent Motion , 1983, Perception.

[8]  Marc Green,et al.  What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? , 1986, Vision Research.

[9]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .

[10]  Jesse Orlansky,et al.  The effect of similarity and difference in form on apparent visual movement , 1940 .

[11]  P A Kolers,et al.  Figural change in apparent motion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  M. Stadler,et al.  Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement , 1986, Vision Research.

[13]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual organization in moving patterns , 1983, Nature.

[14]  S. Ullman The Effect of Similarity between Line Segments on the Correspondence Strength in Apparent Motion , 1980, Perception.

[15]  J. A. Gengerelli,et al.  Apparent movement in relation to homonymous and heteronymous stimulation of the cerebral hemispheres. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.