Apparent motion: Evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Navon,et al. Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] S. Siegel,et al. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[3] K. Berbaum,et al. Dimensions of figural identity and apparent motion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Andrew B. Watson. Apparent motion occurs only between similar spatial frequencies , 1986, Vision Research.
[5] S. Ullman. The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .
[6] V. Ramachandran,et al. Visual inertia in apparent motion , 1987, Vision Research.
[7] V S Ramachandran,et al. Low Spatial Frequencies Dominate Apparent Motion , 1983, Perception.
[8] Marc Green,et al. What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? , 1986, Vision Research.
[9] P. Burt,et al. Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .
[10] Jesse Orlansky,et al. The effect of similarity and difference in form on apparent visual movement , 1940 .
[11] P A Kolers,et al. Figural change in apparent motion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.
[12] M. Stadler,et al. Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement , 1986, Vision Research.
[13] V. S. Ramachandran,et al. Perceptual organization in moving patterns , 1983, Nature.
[14] S. Ullman. The Effect of Similarity between Line Segments on the Correspondence Strength in Apparent Motion , 1980, Perception.
[15] J. A. Gengerelli,et al. Apparent movement in relation to homonymous and heteronymous stimulation of the cerebral hemispheres. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.