National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales – The German exemplar

Abstract The EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 requires the Member States of the European Union to map and assess ecosystem services. This paper presents a procedure for developing a national framework of ecosystem service indicators for Germany that is applicable at different scales and is transferable to other countries. The framework was set up to use existing indicators or datasets and to be compatible with international typologies of ecosystem services and their indicators. Starting with an evaluation of the importance of different ecosystem services for Germany and an analysis of existing monitoring systems, we define suitable indicators for mapping ecosystem services nationwide. We demonstrate how both the supply of and demand for ecosystem services can be mapped with different indicators and datasets and how these indicators have to be adapted for use at different scales. Subsequently, we analyze the resulting maps to draw conclusions about the suitability of the different indicators and their complementarity. Furthermore, we show synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Germany and discuss the applicability of the ecosystem services concept for decision making and spatial planning.

[1]  José I. Barredo,et al.  Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services - An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 , 2013 .

[2]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Understanding the value of urban riparian corridors: Considerations in planning for cultural services along an Indonesian river , 2015 .

[3]  D. Armenteras,et al.  National ecosystems services priorities for planning carbon and water resource management in Colombia , 2015 .

[4]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services , 2012 .

[5]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[6]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  A. Getis.  The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics , 2010 .

[8]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Dunbar,et al.  The importance of scale in the development of ecosystem service indicators , 2016 .

[10]  J. Hauck,et al.  What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  Xi-sheng Hu,et al.  Geographic variations of ecosystem service intensity in Fuzhou City, China. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project , 1995, Urban Ecosystems.

[13]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[14]  Cecil C. Konijnendijk,et al.  Urban Forests and Trees , 2005 .

[15]  P. Harrison,et al.  Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review , 2014 .

[16]  T. Koellner,et al.  Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators: insights from Germany. , 2016 .

[17]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere , 2012, Nature.

[18]  Yang Bai,et al.  Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed , 2011 .

[19]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  G. Daily,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2001, Science.

[21]  A. Troy,et al.  Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains , 2016, Regional Environmental Change.

[22]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems , 2008 .

[23]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services , 2011 .

[24]  B. Voigt,et al.  From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments , 2014 .

[25]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[26]  U. Wissen Hayek,et al.  Bringing ecosystem services indicators into spatial planning practice: Lessons from collaborative development of a web-based visualization platform , 2016 .

[27]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  B. Kleinschmit,et al.  Testing the red edge channel for improving land-use classifications based on high-resolution multi-spectral satellite data , 2012 .

[29]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[30]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[31]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning—trade-offs from reducing water erosion , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  Paul C. Sutton,et al.  SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets , 2002 .

[33]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  Ecosystem services from a degraded peatland of Central Kalimantan: implications for policy, planning, and management. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[34]  Joachim Maes,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. , 2013 .

[35]  Roldan Muradian,et al.  Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[36]  Lars Hein,et al.  Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting , 2015 .

[37]  Leena Kopperoinen,et al.  Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  F. Müller,et al.  Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification , 2014 .

[39]  C. Kremen.  Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[40]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  Flood regulating ecosystem services—Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria , 2012 .

[41]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[42]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[43]  John Handley,et al.  "City form and natural process" - Indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK , 2001 .

[44]  K. Shine,et al.  Intergovernmental panel on Climate change (IPCC),in encyclopedia of Enviroment and society,Vol.3 , 2007 .

[45]  D. Russi,et al.  Towards a sustainable and genuinely green economy : the value and social significance of ecosystem services in Finland (TEEB for Finland) : synthesis and roadmap , 2015 .

[46]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[47]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[48]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[49]  Judith Klostermann,et al.  Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe: Challenges and opportunities for cities together with supportive national and European policies , 2012 .

[50]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape , 2015, AMBIO.

[51]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Forest Sustainability in China and Implications for a Telecoupled World , 2013 .

[52]  L. Alessa,et al.  Social–ecological hotspots mapping : A spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space , 2008 .

[53]  Jiangxiao Qiu,et al.  Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[55]  Patrick J. O’Farrell,et al.  Mapping Ecological Processes and Ecosystem Services for Prioritizing Restoration Efforts in a Semi-arid Mediterranean River Basin , 2014, Environmental Management.

[56]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services , 2014 .

[57]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy , 2012 .

[58]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy , 2012 .

[59]  José A. Sobrino,et al.  Urban Heat Island Effect , 2013 .

[60]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  The use of detailed biotope data for linking biodiversity with ecosystem services in Finland , 2012 .

[61]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Christian K. Feld,et al.  Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[63]  Jianguo Liu.  Forest Sustainability in China and Implications for a Telecoupled World: China and a Telecoupled World , 2014 .

[64]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[65]  L. Hein,et al.  Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway , 2014 .

[66]  A. Meiner,et al.  An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2016 .

[67]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  H. Haberl,et al.  Challenges for land system science , 2012 .

[69]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption , 2009 .

[70]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[71]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[72]  Luis Inostroza,et al.  Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review , 2016 .

[73]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services , 2013 .

[74]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework , 2016 .

[75]  Christian Albert,et al.  Scaling Policy Conflicts in Ecosystem Services Governance: A Framework for Spatial Analysis , 2017 .

[76]  B. Burkhard,et al.  The Promise of the Ecosystem Services Concept for Planning and Decision-Making , 2013 .

[77]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution , 2013 .

[78]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[79]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services , 2015 .

[80]  D. Horst,et al.  Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[81]  V. Shandas,et al.  Growing Cities Depend on Ecosystem Services , 2012 .

[82]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[83]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries. , 2013 .

[84]  Paracchini Maria-Luisa,et al.  A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services - Towards an atlas of ecosystem services , 2011 .