Simulated unbound structures for benchmarking of protein docking in the Dockground resource

BackgroundProteins play an important role in biological processes in living organisms. Many protein functions are based on interaction with other proteins. The structural information is important for adequate description of these interactions. Sets of protein structures determined in both bound and unbound states are essential for benchmarking of the docking procedures. However, the number of such proteins in PDB is relatively small. A radical expansion of such sets is possible if the unbound structures are computationally simulated.ResultsThe Dockground public resource provides data to improve our understanding of protein–protein interactions and to assist in the development of better tools for structural modeling of protein complexes, such as docking algorithms and scoring functions. A large set of simulated unbound protein structures was generated from the bound structures. The modeling protocol was based on 1 ns Langevin dynamics simulation. The simulated structures were validated on the ensemble of experimentally determined unbound and bound structures. The set is intended for large scale benchmarking of docking algorithms and scoring functions.ConclusionsA radical expansion of the unbound protein docking benchmark set was achieved by simulating the unbound structures. The simulated unbound structures were selected according to criteria from systematic comparison of experimentally determined bound and unbound structures. The set is publicly available at http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu.

[1]  J. Rodrigues,et al.  Integrative computational modeling of protein interactions , 2014, The FEBS journal.

[2]  Akio Kitao,et al.  Picosecond fluctuating protein energy landscape mapped by pressure–temperature molecular dynamics simulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  K S Wilson,et al.  Complex between the subtilisin from a mesophilic bacterium and the leech inhibitor eglin-C. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science.

[4]  F M Poulsen,et al.  Refinement of the three-dimensional solution structure of barley serine proteinase inhibitor 2 and comparison with the structures in crystals. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Marc F Lensink,et al.  Docking, scoring, and affinity prediction in CAPRI , 2013, Proteins.

[7]  Hongbo Zhu,et al.  NOXclass: prediction of protein-protein interaction types , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[9]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.03154503 References , 2003 .

[10]  I. Vakser Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[11]  András Perczel,et al.  Reconciling the lock‐and‐key and dynamic views of canonical serine protease inhibitor action , 2010, FEBS letters.

[12]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Rigid Body Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Molecular Docking. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[13]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Sampling and scoring: A marriage made in heaven , 2013, Proteins.

[14]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[16]  D. R. Holland,et al.  Nerve growth factor in different crystal forms displays structural flexibility and reveals zinc binding sites. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.

[19]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Side-chain conformational changes upon Protein-Protein Association. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Dominique Douguet,et al.  DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: Unbound structures for docking , 2007, Proteins.

[21]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  An overview of recent advances in structural bioinformatics of protein-protein interactions and a guide to their principles. , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[22]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  Paul D. Adams,et al.  Evidence of Functional Protein Dynamics from X-Ray Crystallographic Ensembles , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Ensemble‐based characterization of unbound and bound states on protein energy landscape , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  Dominique Douguet,et al.  DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces , 2006, Bioinform..