Software defined networking-based vehicular Adhoc Network with Fog Computing

Vehicular Adhoc Networks (VANETs) have been attracted a lot of research recent years. Although VANETs are deployed in reality offering several services, the current architecture has been facing many difficulties in deployment and management because of poor connectivity, less scalability, less flexibility and less intelligence. We propose a new VANET architecture called FSDN which combines two emergent computing and network paradigm Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Fog Computing as a prospective solution. SDN-based architecture provides flexibility, scalability, programmability and global knowledge while Fog Computing offers delay-sensitive and location-awareness services which could be satisfy the demands of future VANETs scenarios. We figure out all the SDN-based VANET components as well as their functionality in the system. We also consider the system basic operations in which Fog Computing are leveraged to support surveillance services by taking into account resource manager and Fog orchestration models. The proposed architecture could resolve the main challenges in VANETs by augmenting Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V), Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I), Vehicle-to-Base Station communications and SDN centralized control while optimizing resources utility and reducing latency by integrating Fog Computing. Two use-cases for non-safety service (data streaming) and safety service (Lane-change assistance) are also presented to illustrate the benefits of our proposed architecture.

[1]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Integrated driving behavior modeling , 2007 .

[2]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Vehicular Networking: A Survey and Tutorial on Requirements, Architectures, Challenges, Standards and Solutions , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[3]  Min Zhu,et al.  B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan , 2013, SIGCOMM.

[4]  Giovanni Pau,et al.  Co-operative downloading in vehicular ad-hoc wireless networks , 2005, Second Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services.

[5]  Thierry Turletti,et al.  The case for software-defined networking in heterogeneous networked environments , 2012, CoNEXT Student '12.

[6]  Waltenegus Dargie,et al.  Does Live Migration of Virtual Machines Cost Energy? , 2013, 2013 IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA).

[7]  A. Neeraja,et al.  Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Cc by Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking , 2022 .

[8]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Modeling Lane-Changing Decisions with MOBIL , 2009 .

[9]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  Lane Change Trajectory Model Considering the Driver Effects Based on MANFIS , 2012 .

[10]  Rand El-Kouatly,et al.  Impact of IDM Lane-Changing on the Performance of AODV on VANETs , 2013 .

[11]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Internet of vehicles: From intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular clouds , 2014, 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[12]  Mohamed Faten Zhani,et al.  Dynamic Controller Provisioning in Software Defined Networks , 2013, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM 2013).

[13]  Liviu Iftode,et al.  Context-Aware Migratory Services in Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  Michael Maile,et al.  Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Final Report: Appendix Volume 1 System Design and Objective Test , 2011 .

[15]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  An architecture for software defined wireless networking , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[16]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  The Fog computing paradigm: Scenarios and security issues , 2014, 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems.

[17]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  A Monocular Vision Advance Warning System for the Automotive Aftermarket , 2005 .

[18]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Software-Defined Networking for RSU Clouds in Support of the Internet of Vehicles , 2015, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[19]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[20]  Gunjan Tank,et al.  Software-Defined Networking-The New Norm for Networks , 2012 .

[21]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Towards software-defined VANET: Architecture and services , 2014, 2014 13th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET).

[22]  Nick McKeown,et al.  OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks , 2008, CCRV.

[23]  Takayuki Nishio,et al.  Service-oriented heterogeneous resource sharing for optimizing service latency in mobile cloud , 2013, MobileCloud '13.