Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Osteoclast-Bone Interface In Vivo

Rat femoral bones were studied by scanning electron microscopy to demonstrate the morphology of osteoclast-bone matrix interfacial relationships. Two general morphological types of actively resorbing osteoclasts were observed . One cell type was approximately ovoid with highly fimbriated borders, fully attached and closely adapted to the resorption surface. The ruffled border of such cells was composed of a number of individual filopodia which were of uniform , regular shape and approximately 2-3 μm in length and 150 nm in diameter. They were found to penetrate the bone matrix to a depth of 1 μm and interdigitated with the surrounding bone. The other cell type was elongated, covered smaller lining cells, and attached to the bone surface by pseudopodia. The bone-contacting face of pseudopodia formed a network of irregular membranous branches apposed closely to the underlying bone matrix. The results revealed the three dimensional ultrastructure of in situ relationship of osteoclast to bone matrix and necessitate a reinterpretation of the geometry of the secondary lysosome of these cells.

[1]  J. Davies,et al.  Deposition of cement at reversal lines in rat femoral bone , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  G. Vaes Cellular biology and biochemical mechanism of bone resorption. A review of recent developments on the formation, activation, and mode of action of osteoclasts. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R. Baron,et al.  Kinetic and cytochemical identification of osteoclast precursors and their differentiation into multinucleated osteoclasts. , 1986, The American journal of pathology.

[4]  M. Horton,et al.  Cell surface characterization of the human osteoclast: Phenotypic relationship to other bone marrow‐derived cell types , 1984, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  P. Revell,et al.  Resorption of bone by isolated rabbit osteoclasts. , 1984, Journal of cell science.

[6]  H. Fleisch [The mechanisms of bone resorption]. , 1981, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift.

[7]  U. Lucht Cytoplasmic vacuoles and bodies of the osteoclast , 1972, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[8]  D. Spiro,et al.  CARTILAGE RESORPTION IN THE TIBIAL EPIPHYSEAL PLATE OF GROWING RATS , 1967, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  S. J. Jones,et al.  The effect of fluoride on the patterns of adherence of osteoclasts cultured on and resorbing dentine: a 3-D assessment of vinculin-labelled cells using confocal optical microscopy , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[10]  S. J. Jones,et al.  The resorption of biological and non-biological substrates by cultured avian and mammalian osteoclasts , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[11]  R. Mieremet,et al.  A morphologic study of osteoclasts isolated from osteopetrotic microphthalmic (mi/mi) mouse and human fetal long bones using an instrument permitting combination of light and scanning electron microscopy. , 1988, Bone.

[12]  J. Kanehisa,et al.  Osteoclastic bone resorption: in vitro analysis of the rate of resorption and migration of individual osteoclasts. , 1988, Bone.

[13]  J. Howship Observations on the morbid structure of Bones, and an attempt at an arrangement of their Diseases. , 1817, Medico-chirurgical transactions.