Multi-level damage identification with response reconstruction

Abstract Damage identification through finite element (FE) model updating usually forms an inverse problem. Solving the inverse identification problem for complex civil structures is very challenging since the dimension of potential damage parameters in a complex civil structure is often very large. Aside from enormous computation efforts needed in iterative updating, the ill-condition and non-global identifiability features of the inverse problem probably hinder the realization of model updating based damage identification for large civil structures. Following a divide-and-conquer strategy, a multi-level damage identification method is proposed in this paper. The entire structure is decomposed into several manageable substructures and each substructure is further condensed as a macro element using the component mode synthesis (CMS) technique. The damage identification is performed at two levels: the first is at macro element level to locate the potentially damaged region and the second is over the suspicious substructures to further locate as well as quantify the damage severity. In each level’s identification, the damage searching space over which model updating is performed is notably narrowed down, not only reducing the computation amount but also increasing the damage identifiability. Besides, the Kalman filter-based response reconstruction is performed at the second level to reconstruct the response of the suspicious substructure for exact damage quantification. Numerical studies and laboratory tests are both conducted on a simply supported overhanging steel beam for conceptual verification. The results demonstrate that the proposed multi-level damage identification via response reconstruction does improve the identification accuracy of damage localization and quantization considerably.

[1]  W. H. Greene,et al.  Computational aspects of sensitivity calculations in linear transient structural analysis , 1989 .

[2]  Ting Wang,et al.  Structural response reconstruction based on the modal superposition method in the presence of closely spaced modes , 2014 .

[3]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[4]  Songye Zhu,et al.  Multi-type sensor placement and response reconstruction for structural health monitoring of long-span suspension bridges , 2016 .

[5]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[6]  X. Y. Li,et al.  Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updating , 2010 .

[7]  Qiao Li,et al.  A novel finite element model updating method based on substructure and response surface model , 2015 .

[8]  L. M. See,et al.  Estimation of structural parameters in time domain: A substructure approach , 1991 .

[9]  Jingjing He,et al.  Structural response reconstruction based on empirical mode decomposition in time domain , 2012 .

[10]  C. D. Zhang,et al.  Comparative studies on damage identification with Tikhonov regularization and sparse regularization , 2016 .

[11]  W. Hurty Dynamic Analysis of Structural Systems Using Component Modes , 1965 .

[12]  Jun Li,et al.  Substructural Response Reconstruction in Wavelet Domain , 2011 .

[13]  Sheng Zhan,et al.  Multi-Type Sensor Placement for Multi-Scale Response Reconstruction , 2013 .

[14]  Baderul Hisham Ahmad,et al.  Application of Neural Network for Prediction of Unmeasured Mode Shape in Damage Detection , 2013 .

[15]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Model-reduction techniques for Bayesian finite element model updating using dynamic response data , 2014 .

[16]  Ho-Kyung Kim,et al.  Reconstruction of dynamic displacement and velocity from measured accelerations using the variational statement of an inverse problem , 2010 .

[17]  Jun Li,et al.  Substructural Damage Detection With Incomplete Information of the Structure , 2012 .

[18]  Ying Lei,et al.  Structural damage detection with limited input and output measurement signals , 2012 .

[19]  Jun Li,et al.  Structural response reconstruction with transmissibility concept in frequency domain , 2011 .

[20]  Akira Mita,et al.  A substructure approach to local damage detection of shear structure , 2012 .

[21]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Optimal multi-type sensor placement for response and excitation reconstruction , 2016 .

[22]  Kalil Erazo,et al.  A model-based observer for state and stress estimation in structural and mechanical systems: Experimental validation , 2014 .

[23]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Component mode synthesis techniques for finite element model updating , 2013 .

[24]  Dongyu Zhang,et al.  Substructure identification for shear structures: cross-power spectral density method , 2012 .

[25]  Robert Grover Brown,et al.  Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering : with MATLAB exercises and solutions , 1996 .

[26]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[27]  D. Rixen,et al.  General Framework for Dynamic Substructuring: History, Review and Classification of Techniques , 2008 .

[28]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Substructure Identification and Health Monitoring Using Noisy Response Measurements Only , 2006, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[29]  Ai Qi,et al.  Free-Interface Modal Synthesis Based Substructural Damage Detection Method , 2014 .

[30]  Yang Liu,et al.  Model Updating of Complex Structures Using the Combination of Component Mode Synthesis and Kriging Predictor , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[31]  C. Koh,et al.  Substructural Identification Method without Interface Measurement , 2003 .

[32]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Substructure based approach to finite element model updating , 2011 .