Joint interpretation of sequential pumping tests in unconfined aquifers

[1] In this study, we developed a stochastic estimator for characterizing the hydraulic heterogeneity in both unsaturated and saturated zones of unconfined aquifers using transient drawdown data from sequential pumping tests. This estimator was built upon the successive linear estimator by Yeh et al. (1996), the simultaneous successive linear estimator by Xiang et al. (2009), and the 3-D finite element program for flow and transport through heterogeneous media by Srivastava and Yeh (1992). The estimator was tested afterward using simulated data sets of sequential pumping tests in a synthetic unconfined aquifer where saturated conductivity, specific storage, saturated water content, and pore-size distribution parameter vary spatially in three dimensions. Test results show that the estimator is able to produce parameter fields that capture the overall 3-D pattern of the true heterogeneous parameter fields. We subsequently validated the estimated parameter fields by assessing their ability to predict drawdowns during an independent pumping test, which was not used during the estimation phase. Results of the validation show that the predicted drawdowns based on the estimated heterogeneous parameter fields are in close agreement with the true drawdowns. In addition, predicted drawdowns based on the parameter fields from the joint interpretation are superior to those based on the parameters estimated from the homogeneous conceptual model. Lastly, while many field experiments are necessary to fully assess the robustness of this estimator and sequential pumping tests, results of this study suggest they are a promising characterization technique for unconfined aquifers.

[1]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Robustness of joint interpretation of sequential pumping tests: Numerical and field experiments , 2011 .

[2]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography for characterization of dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones , 2007 .

[3]  T. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .

[4]  A Revil,et al.  A Potential‐Based Inversion of Unconfined Steady‐State Hydraulic Tomography , 2009, Ground water.

[5]  Cokriging estimation of the conductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions , 1999 .

[6]  Allen F. Moench Combining the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer , 1995 .

[7]  Jet-Chau Wen,et al.  Necessary conditions for inverse modeling of flow through variably saturated porous media , 2013 .

[8]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography , 2007 .

[9]  P. K. Kitanidis,et al.  Large‐scale inverse modeling with an application in hydraulic tomography , 2011 .

[10]  T. Yeh,et al.  Sensitivity and moment analyses of head in variably saturated regimes , 1998 .

[11]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  A field assessment of high‐resolution aquifer characterization based on hydraulic travel time and hydraulic attenuation tomography , 2011 .

[12]  N S Boulton,et al.  ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM NON-EQUILIBRIUM PUMPING TESTS ALLOWING FOR DELAYED YIELD FROM STORAGE. , 1963 .

[13]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data: A laboratory sandbox study , 2007 .

[14]  C. E. Jacob,et al.  A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history , 1946 .

[15]  Anthony Skjellum,et al.  Using MPI - portable parallel programming with the message-parsing interface , 1994 .

[16]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography , 2004 .

[17]  R. Srivastava,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical model for water flow and transport of chemically reactive solute through porous media under variably saturated conditions , 1992 .

[18]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .

[19]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 1. Statistically Isotropic Media , 1985 .

[20]  G. Dagan,et al.  A Method of Determining the Permeability and Effective Porosity of Unconfined Anisotropie Aquifers , 1967 .

[21]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy , 2007 .

[22]  M. Cardiff,et al.  3‐D transient hydraulic tomography in unconfined aquifers with fast drainage response , 2011 .

[23]  Minghui Jin,et al.  AN ITERATIVE STOCHASTIC INVERSE METHOD: CONDITIONAL EFFECTIVE TRANSMISSIVITY AND HYDRAULIC HEAD FIELDS , 1995 .

[24]  Barbara Chapman,et al.  Using OpenMP - portable shared memory parallel programming , 2007, Scientific and engineering computation.

[25]  Cheng-Haw Lee,et al.  Time to Change the Way We Collect and Analyze Data for Aquifer Characterization , 2007, Ground water.

[26]  R. Gillham,et al.  A Comparative Study of Specific Yield Determinations for a Shallow Sand Aquifer , 1984 .

[27]  G. A. Bruggeman The Reciprocity Principle in Flow Through Heterogeneous Porous Media , 1972 .

[28]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Practical Issues in Imaging Hydraulic Conductivity through Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.

[29]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  An interactive Bayesian geostatistical inverse protocol for hydraulic tomography , 2006 .

[30]  Type‐Curve Analysis of Time‐Draw down Data for Partially Penetrating Wells in Unconfined Anisotropic Aquifers , 1978 .

[31]  S. Mathias,et al.  Linearized Richards' equation approach to pumping test analysis in compressible aquifers , 2006 .

[32]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Capturing aquifer heterogeneity: Comparison of approaches through controlled sandbox experiments , 2011 .

[33]  Shuyun Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments , 2001 .

[34]  A. Bellin,et al.  A Bayesian approach for inversion of hydraulic tomographic data , 2009 .

[35]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges? , 2005 .

[36]  A. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 2. Statistically Anisotropic Media With Variable α , 1985 .

[37]  T. Yeh,et al.  Cost-effective hydraulic tomography surveys for predicting flow and transport in heterogeneous aquifers. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Three‐dimensional transient hydraulic tomography in a highly heterogeneous glaciofluvial aquifer‐aquitard system , 2011 .

[39]  James J. Butler,et al.  Inherent Limitations of Hydraulic Tomography , 2010, Ground water.

[40]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: 3. Observations and Applications , 1985 .

[41]  W. Li,et al.  Two‐dimensional characterization of hydraulic heterogeneity by multiple pumping tests , 2007 .

[42]  David Russo,et al.  Determining soil hydraulic properties by parameter estimation: On the selection of a model for the hydraulic properties , 1988 .

[43]  Cheng-Haw Lee,et al.  A revisit of drawdown behavior during pumping in unconfined aquifers , 2010 .

[44]  T. Yeh,et al.  Stochastic inversion of pneumatic cross-hole tests and barometric pressure fluctuations in heterogeneous unsaturated formations , 2008 .

[45]  Jet-Chau Wen,et al.  Cross‐correlation analysis and information content of observed heads during pumping in unconfined aquifers , 2013 .

[46]  James J. Butler,et al.  Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2002 .

[47]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Comparison of aquifer characterization approaches through steady state groundwater model validation: A controlled laboratory sandbox study , 2010 .

[48]  David Russo,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial variability in unsaturated flow parameters , 1992 .

[49]  Jet-Chau Wen,et al.  A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis , 2009 .

[50]  Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al.  A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2007 .

[51]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Pumping-induced vadose zone drainage and storage in an unconfined aquifer: A comparison of analytical model predictions and field measurements , 2007 .

[52]  T. Yeh,et al.  Estimation of effective aquifer hydraulic properties from an aquifer test with multi-well observations (Taiwan) , 2010 .

[53]  Hiromitsu Saegusa,et al.  Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami Underground Research site, Japan , 2009 .

[54]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach , 2003 .

[55]  Anthony Skjellum,et al.  Using MPI: portable parallel programming with the message-passing interface, 2nd Edition , 1999, Scientific and engineering computation series.

[56]  C. V. Theis The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage , 1935 .

[57]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .

[58]  Improved predictions of saturated and unsaturated zone drawdowns in a heterogeneous unconfined aquifer via transient hydraulic tomography: Laboratory sandbox experiments , 2012 .

[59]  T. Yeh,et al.  Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data , 2006 .

[60]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Improved forward and inverse analyses of saturated‐unsaturated flow toward a well in a compressible unconfined aquifer , 2010 .

[61]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  An inverse model for three‐dimensional flow in variably saturated porous media , 2000 .

[62]  W. R. Gardner SOME STEADY‐STATE SOLUTIONS OF THE UNSATURATED MOISTURE FLOW EQUATION WITH APPLICATION TO EVAPORATION FROM A WATER TABLE , 1958 .

[63]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Comparison of Approaches for Predicting Solute Transport: Sandbox Experiments , 2012, Ground water.

[64]  T. D. Streltsova Unsteady radial flow in an unconfined aquifer , 1972 .

[65]  S. P. Neuman Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table , 1972 .