An Efficient Pruning Method for Decision Alternatives of OWA Operators

In this paper, we present an efficient method for pruning decision alternatives in the case of using ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators for decision making. The proposed method helps to identify inferior alternatives that are less likely to be selected out of competing alternatives as the OWA aggregation proceeds. It thus enables us to diminish the number of alternatives before applying the OWA operators. The reordering process unique to the OWA aggregation plays an important role in identifying inferior alternatives. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated by simulation analysis in which artificial decision problems of diverse sizes are generated and then examined with four scenarios: pruning alternatives, pruning alternatives with rank-order OWA weights, pruning alternatives with a normalized decision problem, and pruning alternatives with both a normalized decision problem and rank-order OWA weights. The proposed method is easy to use, and the simulation results show that the number of alternatives can be reduced drastically by applying this method.

[1]  Robert Fullér,et al.  On Obtaining Minimal Variability Owa Operator Weights , 2002, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  M. O’Hagan.  A Fuzzy Neuron Based on Maximum Entropy Ordered Weighted Averaging , 1990, 1990 Conference Record Twenty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 1990..

[3]  R. Yager.  Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators , 1996, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[4]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Preference relation approach for obtaining OWA operators weights , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[5]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An overview of methods for determining OWA weights , 2005, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  A. Chandramohan,et al.  On the new quantifiers and their use in multicriteria decision functions via ordered weighted aggregations , 2006 .

[7]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  Some properties of the weighted OWA operator , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[8]  R. Fullér.  OWA Operators in Decision Making , 2003 .

[9]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Applications and Extensions of OWA Aggregations , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[10]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[11]  Z. S. Xu,et al.  The uncertain OWA operator , 2002, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  Dimitar Filev,et al.  Analytic Properties of Maximum Entropy OWA Operators , 1995, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Dimitar Filev,et al.  On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Some Quantifier Functions From Weighting Functions With Constant Value of Orness , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[16]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Robert Fullér,et al.  An Analytic Approach for Obtaining Maximal Entropy Owa Operator Weights , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  On the properties of OWA operator weights functions with constant level of orness , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[19]  Horst A. Eiselt,et al.  Some Extensions of Domain Criteria in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1990 .

[20]  R. Yager.  Families of OWA operators , 1993 .

[21]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Least‐squared ordered weighted averaging operator weights , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[22]  G. Schneller,et al.  Decision making under uncertainty: Starr's Domain criterion , 1983 .

[23]  R. Fullér.  On Obtaining OWA Operator Weights: A Sort Survey of Recent Developments , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Computational Cybernetics.