Exploring SMEs' behavioral intentions of participating in platform-based innovation ecosystems

PurposeSmall- and-medium sized enterprises (SMEs) significantly contribute to the success of platform-based innovation ecosystems (PIEs). However, less is known about their behaviors and behavioral intentions (BIs) toward participating in PIEs. Considering that SMEs' BIs directly influence their behaviors and reveal the underlying logic of their behaviors, this study, therefore, focuses on SMEs' BIs and explores the antecedents to reveal the rational effects on BIs of the participation.Design/methodology/approachAn extended framework is proposed to understand SMEs' BIs toward the participation and empirically tested with data from a sample of 189 Chinese SMEs based on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsThe results show that (1) the framework has a good fit in the context of PIEs and a large predictability of SMEs' BIs toward the participation; (2) as expected, SMEs' BIs are directly positively affected by their attitudes (ATTs), subjective norms (SNs) and platform leaders (PLs), while indirectly positively influenced by perceived usefulness (PU) and ease and negatively influenced by perceived risks (PRs) via mediation effects and (3) surprisingly, BIs are directly negatively affected by platforms probably because of the potential collaborative risks based on platforms.Originality/valueThis study enriches PIE literature by focusing on complementors and proposing a framework of SMEs' BI toward joining PIEs, and it also expands the application of BI–behavior theories in the context of PIEs by offering a BI–behavior perspective to analyze the rational logic of SMEs' behaviors of participating to PIEs. Practically, the main findings not only benefit SMEs to better understand their BIs and to make a wise choice toward the participation, but provide implications for PLs to proactively design interventions for attracting SMEs’ complementors.

[1]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites , 2016 .

[2]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[4]  Javier Cenamor,et al.  Adopting a platform approach in servitization : Leveraging the value of digitalization , 2017 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[6]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  Open Innovation in SMEs: Exploring Inter-Organizational Relationships in an Ecosystem , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[7]  Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja,et al.  The Measurement of University Students' Intention to Use Blended Learning System through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) at Developed and Developing Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia , 2020, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[8]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[9]  Tobias Kretschmer,et al.  Platform Architecture, Multihoming and Complement Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Video Game Industry , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  David Wood,et al.  Evolving an Open Ecosystem: The Rise and Fall of the Symbian Platform , 2014 .

[11]  Nanping Feng,et al.  A conceptual framework of two-stage partner selection in platform-based innovation ecosystems for servitization , 2020 .

[12]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Exploring the effects of inter-firm linkages on SMEs' open innovation from an ecosystem perspective: An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing SMEs , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[13]  Ron Adner Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[14]  Vinit Parida,et al.  Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms , 2021, Technovation.

[15]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[16]  James G. Bohn Development and exploratory validation of an organizational efficacy scale , 2010 .

[17]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration and Firm Value in Software Ecosystems: Evidence From Cloud Computing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Capacity‐constrained entrepreneurs and their product portfolio size: The response to a platform design change on a Chinese sharing economy platform , 2020 .

[19]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[20]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2021, Handbook of Market Research.

[21]  Shelley D. Dionne,et al.  State-of-the-science review of leader-follower dyads research , 2020 .

[22]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  In search of complementarities within and across platform ecosystems: Complementors’ relative standing and performance in mobile apps ecosystems , 2020 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Tony W. Tong,et al.  Platform Governance Design in Platform Ecosystems: Implications for Complementors’ Multihoming Decision , 2021, Journal of Management.

[26]  Rodrigo Kazuo Ikenami,et al.  Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends , 2016, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[27]  Shuai Ding,et al.  Exploring behavioural intentions toward smart healthcare services among medical practitioners: a technology transfer perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions , 2020, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[29]  H. Musa,et al.  Malaysian SMEs Development: Future and Challenges on Going Green , 2016 .

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[32]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[33]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned Action , 1992 .

[35]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[36]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[37]  Han Zhang,et al.  Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Platform-based service innovation and system design: research opportunities , 2018, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[39]  Xiaofei Niu,et al.  Integrating context-awareness and UTAUT to explain Alipay user adoption , 2019, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

[40]  Jason Lortie,et al.  The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship research: what we know and future directions , 2015 .

[41]  Andrew C. Lyons,et al.  SMEs embedded in collaborative innovation networks: How to measure their absorptive capacity? , 2020 .

[42]  Javier Cenamor,et al.  How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[43]  O. Dedehayir,et al.  A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda , 2019, European Journal of Innovation Management.

[44]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[45]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[46]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[47]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature , 2020, Journal of Management.

[48]  Javier Cenamor Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions , 2021 .

[49]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[50]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS path modeling and evolutionary segmentation , 2013 .

[51]  Ales Popovic,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Understanding the determinants of business intelligence system adoption stages : an empirical study of SMEs , 2018 .

[52]  Ozgur Dedehayir,et al.  Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review , 2016, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[53]  Jiang Yu,et al.  Linking business ecosystem lifecycle with platform strategy: a triple view of technology, application and organisation , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[54]  S. Huang,et al.  An empirical study of on-line tax filing acceptance model: Integrating TAM and TPB , 2010 .