integrated care pathways for end of life care perceptions of the benefits and harms of study of health care professionals ' ' It doesn ' t do the care for you ' : a qualitative

Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

[1]  I. Higginson,et al.  ‘Less ticking the boxes, more providing support’: A qualitative study on health professionals’ concerns towards the Liverpool Care of the Dying Pathway , 2015, Palliative medicine.

[2]  A. van der Heide,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway in the Netherlands: a qualitative study , 2014, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[3]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Lessons from the Liverpool Care Pathway—evidence is key , 2014, The Lancet.

[4]  C. Brunelli,et al.  Liverpool Care Pathway for patients with cancer in hospital: a cluster randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[5]  I. Higginson,et al.  Time for a prospective study to evaluate the Amber Care Bundle , 2013, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[6]  I. Higginson,et al.  Development and evaluation of the feasibility and effects on staff, patients, and families of a new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE), to improve communication and palliative care in intensive care and during clinical uncertainty , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[7]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review , 2013, BMJ Open.

[8]  M. Hotopf,et al.  Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[9]  I. Higginson,et al.  Research into end-of-life cancer care—investment is needed , 2012, The Lancet.

[10]  D. Murphy.  The Liverpool Care Pathway provides clarity and focus; communication, care, and compassion come from you. , 2011, International journal of palliative nursing.

[11]  P. Davidson,et al.  End-of-life care pathways in acute and hospice care: an integrative review. , 2011, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[12]  M. Costantini,et al.  Expectations about and impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in an Italian hospital , 2011, Palliative medicine.

[13]  M. Raitt,et al.  Introduction of the Liverpool Care Pathway for end of life care to emergency medicine , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[14]  A. Oxman,et al.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  B. Jack,et al.  The Liverpool Care Pathway in hospices: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions. , 2006, International journal of palliative nursing.

[17]  B. Jack,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in the acute hospital setting. , 2003, International journal of palliative nursing.

[18]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  H. Campbell,et al.  Integrated care pathways , 1998, BMJ.

[20]  J. Webster,et al.  End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.