Removal of Pulse Artefact from EEG Data Recorded in MR Environment at 3T. Setting of ICA Parameters for Marking Artefactual Components: Application to Resting-State Data

Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allow for a non-invasive investigation of cerebral functions with high temporal and spatial resolution. The main challenge of such integration is the removal of the pulse artefact (PA) that affects EEG signals recorded in the magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. Often applied techniques for this purpose are Optimal Basis Set (OBS) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). The combination of OBS and ICA is increasingly used, since it can potentially improve the correction performed by each technique separately. The present study is focused on the OBS-ICA combination and is aimed at providing the optimal ICA parameters for PA correction in resting-state EEG data, where the information of interest is not specified in latency and amplitude as in, for example, evoked potential. A comparison between two intervals for ICA calculation and four methods for marking artefactual components was performed. The performance of the methods was discussed in terms of their capability to 1) remove the artefact and 2) preserve the information of interest. The analysis included 12 subjects and two resting-state datasets for each of them. The results showed that none of the signal lengths for the ICA calculation was highly preferable to the other. Among the methods for the identification of PA-related components, the one based on the wavelets transform of each component emerged as the best compromise between the effectiveness in removing PA and the conservation of the physiological neuronal content.

[1]  P. Comon Independent Component Analysis , 1992 .

[2]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Computation.

[5]  S. Debener,et al.  Properties of the ballistocardiogram artefact as revealed by EEG recordings at 1.5, 3 and 7 T static magnetic field strength. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  EEG acquisition in ultra-high static magnetic fields up to 9.4T , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Simultaneous EEG–fMRI acquisition at low, high and ultra-high magnetic fields up to 9.4T: Perspectives and challenges , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Attention to Detail: Why Considering Task Demands Is Essential for Single-Trial Analysis of BOLD Correlates of the Visual P1 and N1 , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Karen J. Mullinger,et al.  Identifying the sources of the pulse artefact in EEG recordings made inside an MR scanner , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. Srivastava,et al.  ICA-based procedures for removing ballistocardiogram artifacts from EEG data acquired in the MRI scanner , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Porcaro,et al.  Multimodal Functional Network Connectivity: An EEG-fMRI Fusion in Network Space , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[13]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Removal of BCG artifacts from EEG recordings inside the MR scanner: A comparison of methodological and validation-related aspects , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Do EEG paradigms work in fMRI? Varying task demands in the visual oddball paradigm: Implications for task design and results interpretation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Helmut Laufs,et al.  Endogenous brain oscillations and related networks detected by surface EEG‐combined fMRI , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Frédéric Grouiller,et al.  A comparative study of different artefact removal algorithms for EEG signals acquired during functional MRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[21]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  BOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Helmut Laufs,et al.  Where the BOLD signal goes when alpha EEG leaves , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  G.J.M. Huiskamp Reduction of the Ballistocardiogram Artifact in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI using ICA , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[27]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[28]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneously with 3-T fMRI: Removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[31]  Bart Vanrumste,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Review on Solving the Inverse Problem in Eeg Source Analysis , 2022 .

[32]  M. Raichle The Brain's Dark Energy , 2006, Science.

[33]  William D. Penny,et al.  Estimating the transfer function from neuronal activity to BOLD using simultaneous EEG-fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Removal of ballistocardiogram artifacts from simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI data using independent component analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[38]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Ballistocardiogram artifacts in simultaneous EEG- fMRI acquisitions , 2007 .

[39]  Manuel Abbafati,et al.  An independent component analysis-based approach on ballistocardiogram artifact removing. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[40]  F. Leijten,et al.  EEG-fMRI in the preoperative work-up for epilepsy surgery. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.