Large deformation analysis of geomechanics problems by a combined rh-adaptive finite element method

Finite element analysis of large deformation problems is a major challenge in computational geomechanics, due largely to the severe mesh distortion that may occur after updating the spatial configuration of the nodal points using a conventional Updated-Lagrangian approach. There are two alternative and reasonably well-known strategies to tackle this issue of mesh distortion, viz., the r-adaptive and h-adaptive methods. The r-adaptive finite element method has been designed to eliminate possible mesh distortion by changing and optimising the locations of the nodal points without modifying the overall topology of the mesh adopted to solve a given problem. In order to obtain an accurate solution by this method a relatively fine mesh is required right from the beginning of the analysis, which potentially increases the overall analysis time. On the other hand, the h-adaptive finite element method improves the accuracy of the solution by gradually decreasing the size of the elements based on an error assessment method. However, this approach may leave the very small elements in the mesh vulnerable to distortion. To eliminate the individual drawbacks of these adaptive methods, while preserving the accuracy of the solution, a combined rh-adaptive finite element method has been developed and is presented in this paper for the analysis of sophisticated problems of geomechanics that involve large deformations and changing boundary conditions. The proposed method is designed to improve the accuracy of the solution obtained using the h-refinement strategy while successfully avoiding the mesh distortion by the use of r-adaptive refinement. It is shown that this new combination can significantly increase the efficiency of adaptive finite element methods.

[1]  T. Belytschko,et al.  H-adaptive finite element methods for dynamic problems, with emphasis on localization , 1993 .

[2]  D. Sheng,et al.  Stress integration and mesh refinement for large deformation in geomechanics , 2006 .

[3]  John P. Carter,et al.  Deep Penetration of Strip and Circular Footings into Layered Clays , 2001 .

[4]  Weizhang Huang,et al.  A two-dimensional moving finite element method with local refinement based on a posteriori error estimates , 2003 .

[5]  Majidreza Nazem,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method for dynamic analysis of geotechnical problems , 2009 .

[6]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Computational Contact Mechanics , 2002 .

[7]  David R. Owen,et al.  On error estimates and adaptivity in elastoplastic solids: Applications to the numerical simulation of strain localization in classical and Cosserat continua , 1994 .

[8]  J. Gillis,et al.  Methods in Computational Physics , 1964 .

[9]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[10]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Computers and Geotechnics , 2013 .

[11]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Adaptive methods for frictionless contact problems , 2001 .

[12]  Amir R. Khoei,et al.  Error estimation, adaptivity and data transfer in enriched plasticity continua to analysis of shear band localization , 2007 .

[13]  Thang Cao,et al.  Adaptive H- and H-R methods for Symm's integral equation , 1998 .

[14]  Mark Randolph,et al.  H-ADAPTIVE FE ANALYSIS OF ELASTO-PLASTIC NON-HOMOGENEOUS SOIL WITH LARGE DEFORMATION , 1998 .

[15]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  COMPUTER MODELS FOR SUBASSEMBLY SIMULATION , 1978 .

[16]  D. Benson An efficient, accurate, simple ALE method for nonlinear finite element programs , 1989 .

[17]  Joseph E. Flaherty,et al.  An adaptive local mesh refinement method for time-dependent partial differential equations , 1989 .

[18]  Antonio Rodríguez-Ferran,et al.  A combined rh‐adaptive scheme based on domain subdivision. Formulation and linear examples , 2001 .

[19]  Junliang Yang,et al.  An operator‐split ALE model for large deformation analysis of geomaterials , 2007 .

[20]  Majidreza Nazem,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method for large‐strain consolidation problems , 2008 .

[21]  A. Huerta,et al.  A unified approach to remeshing strategies for finite element h-adaptivity , 1999 .

[22]  Yuxia Hu,et al.  Limiting resistance of a spherical penetrometer in cohesive material , 2000 .

[23]  M. Fortin,et al.  Anisotropic mesh adaptation: towards user‐independent, mesh‐independent and solver‐independent CFD. Part I: general principles , 2000 .

[24]  M. Vable,et al.  An HR‐method of mesh refinement for boundary element method , 1998 .

[25]  Majidreza Nazem,et al.  A comparative study of error assessment techniques for dynamic contact problems of geomechanics , 2012 .

[26]  Majidreza Nazem,et al.  Refined h-adaptive finite element procedure for large deformation geotechnical problems , 2011 .

[27]  E. Kita,et al.  r- and hr-adaptive boundary element method for two-dimensional potential problem , 2000 .

[28]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Recovery procedures in error estimation and adaptivity. Part II: Adaptivity in nonlinear problems of elasto-plasticity behaviour , 1999 .

[29]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique , 1992 .