plant: A package for modelling forest trait ecology and evolution

Population dynamics in forests are strongly size‐structured: larger plants shade smaller plants while also expending proportionately more energy on building and maintaining woody stems. Although the importance of size structure for demography is widely recognized, many models either omit it entirely or include only coarse approximations. Here, we introduce the plant package, an extensible framework for modelling size‐ and trait‐structured demography, ecology and evolution in simulated forests. At its core, plant is an individual‐based model where plant physiology and demography are mediated by traits. Individual plants from multiple species can be grown in isolation, in patches of competing plants or in metapopulations under a disturbance regime. These dynamics can be integrated into metapopulation‐level estimates of invasion fitness and vegetation structure. Because fitness emerges as a function of traits, plant provides a novel arena for exploring eco‐evolutionary dynamics. plant is an open source R package and is available at github.com/traitecoevo/plant. Accessed from R, the core routines in plant are written in C++. The package provides for alternative physiologies and for capturing trade‐offs among parameters. A detailed test suite is provided to ensure correct behaviour of the code. plant provides a transparent platform for investigating how physiological rules and functional trade‐offs interact with competition and disturbance regimes to influence vegetation demography, structure and diversity.

[1]  K. Esler,et al.  Environmental drivers of demographic variation across the global geographical range of 26 plant species , 2016 .

[2]  S. McMahon,et al.  Demography beyond the population , 2016 .

[3]  S. Ellner,et al.  Evolving integral projection models: evolutionary demography meets eco‐evolutionary dynamics , 2016 .

[4]  Helene C. Muller-Landau,et al.  Functional traits as predictors of vital rates across the life cycle of tropical trees , 2016 .

[5]  Robin L. Chazdon,et al.  A trait‐mediated, neighbourhood approach to quantify climate impacts on successional dynamics of tropical rainforests , 2016 .

[6]  Oscar Angulo,et al.  Study on the efficiency in the numerical integration of size-structured population models: Error and computational cost , 2016, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[7]  Anja Rammig,et al.  Leaf and stem economics spectra drive diversity of functional plant traits in a dynamic global vegetation model , 2015, Global change biology.

[8]  S. Malyshev,et al.  Scaling from individual trees to forests in an Earth system modeling framework using a mathematically tractable model of height-structured competition , 2015 .

[9]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Multi-trait eco-evolutionary dynamics explain niche diversity and evolved neutrality in forests , 2015, bioRxiv.

[10]  Oscar Angulo,et al.  Analysis of an efficient integrator for a size-structured population model with a dynamical resource , 2014, Comput. Math. Appl..

[11]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites , 2014, The New phytologist.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  Murray A. Jorgensen,et al.  The whole‐plant compensation point as a measure of juvenile tree light requirements , 2013 .

[14]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model , 2013 .

[15]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[16]  Åke Brännström,et al.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to Adaptive Dynamics , 2013, Games.

[17]  Dirk Eddelbuettel,et al.  Seamless R and C++ Integration with Rcpp , 2013 .

[18]  Daniel Simpson,et al.  On the Convergence of the Escalator Boxcar Train , 2012, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  Niels von Festenberg,et al.  The Hitchhiker ' s Guide to adaptive dynamics Games , 2013 .

[20]  Robert Piessens,et al.  Quadpack: A Subroutine Package for Automatic Integration , 2011 .

[21]  Uta Berger,et al.  Growth Strategies of Tropical Tree Species: Disentangling Light and Size Effects , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  Dirk Eddelbuettel,et al.  Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration , 2011 .

[23]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Influence of four major plant traits on average height, leaf‐area cover, net primary productivity, and biomass density in single‐species forests: a theoretical investigation , 2011 .

[24]  S. Thomas Age-Related Changes in Tree Growth and Functional Biology: The Role of Reproduction , 2011 .

[25]  D. A. King Size-Related Changes in Tree Proportions and Their Potential Influence on the Course of Height Growth , 2011 .

[26]  Sandeep Koranne,et al.  Boost C++ Libraries , 2011 .

[27]  Leaf biomass changes with stand development in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa [Sieb. et Zucc.] Endl.) , 2010, Plant Ecology.

[28]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2 , 2009 .

[29]  J. Dushoff,et al.  SCALING FROM TREES TO FORESTS: TRACTABLE MACROSCOPIC EQUATIONS FOR FOREST DYNAMICS , 2008 .

[30]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[31]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predictive Models of Forest Dynamics , 2008, Science.

[32]  S. Itch,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[33]  J. Baltzer,et al.  Determinants of whole‐plant light requirements in Bornean rain forest tree saplings , 2007 .

[34]  Nathan G. Swenson,et al.  A general integrative model for scaling plant growth, carbon flux, and functional trait spectra , 2007, Nature.

[35]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Mortality and tree‐size distributions in natural mixed‐age forests , 2007 .

[36]  P. David,et al.  Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[37]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[38]  M. E. Galassi,et al.  GNU SCIENTI C LIBRARY REFERENCE MANUAL , 2005 .

[39]  Oscar Angulo,et al.  Numerical integration of fully nonlinear size-structured population models , 2004 .

[40]  Belinda Barnes,et al.  An ecological framework linking scales across space and time based on self-thinning. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive dynamics and evolving biodiversity , 2004 .

[42]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[43]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  World-wide leaf economics spectrum , 2004 .

[44]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[45]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[46]  R. Dial The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography.Monographs in Population Biology, Volume 32. ByStephen P Hubbell.Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press. $75.00 (hardcover); $29.95 (paper). xiv + 375 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–691–02129–5 (hc); 0–691–02128–7 (pb). 2001. , 2002 .

[47]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Age-related Decline in Forest Ecosystem Growth: An Individual-Tree, Stand-Structure Hypothesis , 2002, Ecosystems.

[48]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  On fitness in structured metapopulations , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[49]  S. Pacala,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2001 .

[50]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2001 .

[51]  F. Smith,et al.  Age-related decline in forest growth: an emergent property , 2001 .

[52]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed mass and seed nutrient content as predictors of seed output variation between species , 2001 .

[53]  J. Metz,et al.  How should we define fitness in structured metapopulation models? Including an application to the calculation of evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[55]  M. Cannell,et al.  Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Representation and Realism , 2000 .

[56]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Interacting effects of herbivory and fertility on a synthesized plant community , 1999 .

[57]  Annikki Mäkelä,et al.  A Carbon Balance Model of Growth and Self-Pruning in Trees Based on Structural Relationships , 1997, Forest Science.

[58]  André M. de Roos,et al.  A Gentle Introduction to Physiologically Structured Population Models , 1997 .

[59]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[60]  M. Yokozawa,et al.  Foliage Profile, Size Structure and Stem Diameter-Plant Height Relationship in Crowded Plant Populations , 1995 .

[61]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species , 1993 .

[62]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  O. Diekmann,et al.  Studying the Dynamics of Structured Population Models: A Versatile Technique and Its Application to Daphnia , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[64]  Alan H. Karp,et al.  A variable order Runge-Kutta method for initial value problems with rapidly varying right-hand sides , 1990, TOMS.

[65]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[66]  A. De Roos,et al.  Numerical methods for structured population models: The Escalator Boxcar Train , 1988 .

[67]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[68]  O. Diekmann,et al.  The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations , 1986 .

[69]  D. Tilman The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[70]  D. C. West,et al.  Forest Succession Models , 1980 .

[71]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[72]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[73]  David M. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[74]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : II. FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN FOREST ECOLOGY , 1964 .

[75]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[76]  Kendrick,et al.  Applications of Mathematics to Medical Problems , 1925, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society.

[77]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .