Group Colocation Behavior in Technological Social Networks

We analyze two large datasets from technological networks with location and social data: user location records from an online location-based social networking service, and anonymized telecommunications data from a European cellphone operator, in order to investigate the differences between individual and group behavior with respect to physical location. We discover agreements between the two datasets: firstly, that individuals are more likely to meet with one friend at a place they have not visited before, but tend to meet at familiar locations when with a larger group. We also find that groups of individuals are more likely to meet at places that their other friends have visited, and that the type of a place strongly affects the propensity for groups to meet there. These differences between group and solo mobility has potential technological applications, for example, in venue recommendation in location-based social networks.

[1]  Etienne Huens,et al.  Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks , 2008, 0802.2178.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks , 2011, KDD.

[3]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity , 2010, WWW '10.

[4]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Antonio Lima,et al.  Interdependence and predictability of human mobility and social interactions , 2012, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[6]  Eric Sun,et al.  Location 3 : How Users Share and Respond to Location-Based Data on Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[7]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[8]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Interplay between Telecommunications and Face-to-Face Interactions: A Study Using Mobile Phone Data , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Geographic Constraints on Social Network Groups , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  Eric Sun,et al.  Location3: How Users Share and Respond to Location-Based Data on Social , 2011, ICWSM.

[12]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks , 2010, UbiComp.

[14]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Socio-Spatial Properties of Online Location-Based Social Networks , 2011, ICWSM.

[15]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[16]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services , 2011, ICWSM.

[17]  F. Calabrese,et al.  Urban gravity: a model for inter-city telecommunication flows , 2009, 0905.0692.