Associations of reproductive time events and intervals with breast cancer risk: A report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study

While there is clear evidence for an association between later age at first live birth and increased breast cancer risk, associations with the timing of other reproductive events are less clear. As breast tissues undergo major structural and cellular changes during pregnancy, we examined associations between reproductive time events and intervals with breast cancer risk among parous women from the population‐based Shanghai Breast Cancer Study (SBCS). Unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with breast cancer risk for 3,269 cases and 3,341 controls. In addition to later age at first live birth, later ages at first pregnancy and last pregnancy were significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk (p‐trend = 0.002, 0.015, 0.008, respectively); longer intervals from menarche to first or last live birth were also associated with increased risk (p‐trend < 0.001, =0.018, respectively). Analyses stratified by menopausal status and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status revealed that associations for later age at first pregnancy or live birth and longer intervals from menarche to first or last live birth occurred among premenopausal women and ER+/PR+ breast cancers, whereas the association for later age at last pregnancy occurred among postmenopausal women and women with ER+/PR− or ER−/PR+ breast cancers. Because of the high correlation with other reproductive variables, models did not include adjustment for age at first live birth; when included, the significance of all associations was attenuated. These findings suggest that while reproductive time events and intervals play an important role in breast cancer etiology, contributions may differ by menopausal status and hormone receptor status of breast cancers.

[1]  X. Shu,et al.  Association of hormone-related characteristics and breast cancer risk by estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status in the shanghai breast cancer study. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  A. McTiernan,et al.  Ovarian hormones and reproductive risk factors for breast cancer in premenopausal women: the Norwegian EBBA-I study , 2011, Human reproduction.

[3]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Timing of Menarche and First Birth in Relation to Risk of Breast Cancer in A-Bomb Survivors , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  P. Kyyrönen,et al.  Birth intervals and breast cancer risk , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  B. Strom,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk and Hormone Receptor Status in Older Women by Parity, Age of First Birth, and Breastfeeding: A Case-Control Study , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[6]  Wei Lu,et al.  History of benign breast disease and risk of breast cancer among women in China: a case–control study , 2008, Cancer Causes & Control.

[7]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Pregnancy and the risk of breast cancer. , 2007, Endocrine-related cancer.

[8]  J. Potter,et al.  Timing of menarche and first full-term birth in relation to breast cancer risk. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  M. Pike,et al.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[10]  A. Neugut,et al.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk among older women , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[11]  B. Strom,et al.  Reproductive factors and subtypes of breast cancer defined by hormone receptor and histology , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Jose Russo,et al.  The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  Breast cancer risk by age at birth, time since birth and time intervals between births: exploring interaction effects , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Gynecologists ACOG committee opinion. Induced abortion and breast cancer risk. Number 285, August 2003. , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  J. Fulton,et al.  An increased risk of breast cancer after delayed first parity. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[16]  B. Stewart,et al.  World Cancer Report , 2003 .

[17]  F. Clavel-Chapelon Cumulative number of menstrual cycles and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study of French women , 2002, Cancer Causes & Control.

[18]  D. Thomas,et al.  Breast cancer in relation to induced abortions in a cohort of Chinese women , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  Mats Lambe,et al.  Transient increase in breast cancer risk after giving birth: postpartum period with the highest risk (Sweden) , 2002, Cancer Causes & Control.

[20]  W. Zheng,et al.  Abortion history and breast cancer risk: Results from the Shanghai breast cancer study , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[21]  S. Duffy,et al.  Variation in the interaction between familial and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer according to age, menopausal status, and degree of familiality. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  A. Lapillonne,et al.  Duration of pregnancy and risk of breast cancer , 1999, The Lancet.

[23]  S. Duffy,et al.  The effects of interaction between familial and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk: a combined analysis of seven case-control studies. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  V. Chinchilli,et al.  Induced Abortion and Risk for Breast Cancer: Reporting (Recall) Bias in a Dutch Case-Control Study , 1996 .

[25]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  The short-term and long-term effect of a pregnancy on breast cancer risk: a prospective study of 802,457 parous Norwegian women. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  Breast Cancer Incidence before Age 55 in Relation to Parity and Age at First and Last Births: A Prospective Study of One Million Norwegian Women , 1994, Epidemiology.

[27]  S. Thompson,et al.  Age at last full-term pregnancy and risk of breast cancer , 1993, The Lancet.

[28]  G. Eklund,et al.  Response bias in a case-control study: analysis utilizing comparative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  B. Henderson,et al.  The international variation in breast cancer rates: An epidemiological assessment , 1991, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[30]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Short term increase in risk of breast cancer after full term pregnancy. , 1988, BMJ.

[31]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  A prospective study of reproductive factors and breast cancer. II. Age at first and last birth. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  P. Kyyrönen,et al.  Dual effect of short interval between first and second birth on ductal breast cancer risk in Finland , 2011, Cancer Causes & Control.

[33]  T. Anderson,et al.  A morphological study of the changes which occur during pregnancy in the human breast , 2004, Virchows Archiv A.

[34]  J. Russo,et al.  Role of differentiation in the pathogenesis and prevention of breast cancer , 1997 .

[35]  H. Adami,et al.  Does age at the last birth affect breast cancer risk? , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[36]  M. Rookus,et al.  REPORTS Induced Abortion and Risk for Breast Cancer: Reporting (Recall) Bias in a Dutch , 1996 .

[37]  F. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  L A Webster,et al.  The independent associations of parity, age at first full term pregnancy, and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of breast cancer. Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[39]  C. Lowe,et al.  Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. , 1970, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.