Abstract : Dramatic changes in the security environment in the past two decades have led to a greatly increased demand for U.S. Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. Today, the Air Force must provide ISR to a growing set of missions, from the global fight against terrorist organizations to humanitarian relief efforts around the globe, while remaining postured to support major combat operations should the need arise. To meet these requirements, the Air Force is currently undertaking unprecedented measures to expand and enhance its ISR capabilities. Particular urgency has been attached to cultivating its fleet of sophisticated remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs) to support current operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Equally critical to these efforts, however, is the Air Force s extensive processing, exploitation, and dissemination (PED) force, which is essential to convert the raw data collected into usable intelligence and deliver it to the warfighter. It is therefore imperative to assess the size and mix of the Air Force s PED force to ensure that the ability to conduct all necessary PED within required timelines keeps pace with the increases in the amount and type of information collected. In this report, part of a fiscal year 2009 2010 study Sizing the U.S. Air Force ISR Force to Meet Future Challenges, we addressed the particular challenges associated with the exploitation of motion imagery within the Air Force Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS). Motion imagery collections from full-motion video sensors on RPAs have risen rapidly to the point at which they now consume the largest share of Air Force DCGS resources, and new wide-area motion imagery sensors now being deployed have the potential to increase the amount of raw data collected by an order of magnitude. The information explosion resulting from these vast amounts of motion imagery threatens to overwhelm Air Force intelligence analysts.
[1]
A. H. TICKNER,et al.
Monitoring up to 16 Synthetic Television Pictures Showing a Great Deal of Movement.
,
1973,
Ergonomics.
[2]
G.E. Moore,et al.
Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits
,
1998,
Proceedings of the IEEE.
[3]
Jeff Hagen,et al.
A Strategies-to-Tasks Framework for Planning and Executing Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Operations
,
2007
.
[4]
A. H. Tickner,et al.
Monitoring 16 Television Screens Showing Little Movement
,
1972
.
[5]
Martina Angela Sasse,et al.
“Not the Usual Suspects”: A study of factors reducing the effectiveness of CCTV
,
2008
.
[6]
Robert Triendl.
Playing catch-up
,
2001,
Nature.
[7]
C. Diffley,et al.
Good practice for the management and operation of town centre CCTV
,
1997
.