Weekly flow cytometric analysis of riverine phytoplankton to determine seasonal bloom dynamics.

Understanding the relative role of anthropogenic and environmental drivers on the timing, magnitude and composition of algal and cyanobacterial blooms is vitally important for the effective management of river catchments. Whilst taxonomic identification and enumeration of algal species can provide valuable insights, the time and specialist skills needed for this approach makes it prohibitive for high frequency and multiple-site studies. Other proxies for phytoplankton, such as total chlorophyll concentration provide little information on community composition. Here we demonstrate the use of flow cytometry (FCM) as a viable alternative approach for monitoring the changing seasonal patterns of abundance, composition and biovolume of phytoplankton in rivers. A FCM assay was set up and calibrated using a range of pure algal cultures and then applied to a year-long, weekly sampling campaign on the River Thames at Wallingford, UK. Ten groups of phytoplankton representing diatoms, chlorophytes, cryptophytes and cyanobacteria were monitored over the course of the year and examined in relation to river physiochemical parameters. Major diatom blooms occurred in spring and autumn, correlating with depletion of soluble reactive phosphorus and dissolved silicon concentrations and we also observed a significant and sustained cyanobacteria bloom between July and October. Pico-chlorophytes (0.2-2.0 μm in diameter) dominated the community throughout the summer period but were not detected using traditional colorimetric chlorophyll analysis, suggesting underestimates of actual phytoplankton standing stocks by traditional methods. We demonstrate high resolution sampling and FCM as a sensitive method for river ecosystem monitoring and that FCM data may be used as an indicator of riverine health.

[1]  Flow cytometric observation of picophytoplankton community structure in the cascade reservoirs along the Wujiang River, SW China , 2009 .

[2]  C. Callieri Single cells and microcolonies of freshwater picocyanobacteria: a common ecology , 2010 .

[3]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[4]  S. Jacquet,et al.  Flow cytometry sorting of freshwater phytoplankton , 2010, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[5]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Shifts in phytoplankton size structure and community composition during grazing by contrasting zooplankton assemblages , 1985 .

[6]  J. Jokela,et al.  An automated platform for phytoplankton ecology and aquatic ecosystem monitoring. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  M. Prévost,et al.  Monitoring of potentially toxic cyanobacteria using an online multi-probe in drinking water sources. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[8]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Assessing Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations in Relation to In-Stream Plant Ecology in Lowland Permeable Catchments: Bringing Ecosystem Functioning Into Water Quality Monitoring , 2004 .

[9]  Cong-Qiang Liu,et al.  The distributions of autumn picoplankton in relation to environmental factors in the reservoirs along the Wujiang River in Guizhou Province, SW China , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  D. Schindler,et al.  Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Geir Johnsen,et al.  Phytoplankton pigments : characterization, chemotaxonomy and applications in oceanography , 2011 .

[12]  M. Bowes,et al.  How green is my river? A new paradigm of eutrophication in rivers. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Monika Winder,et al.  The annual cycles of phytoplankton biomass , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Andrew C. Johnson,et al.  Physico-chemical factors alone cannot simulate phytoplankton behaviour in a lowland river , 2013 .

[15]  R. Andersen,et al.  Algal culturing techniques , 2005 .

[16]  Ling Lin,et al.  Flow cytometry investigation of picoplankton across latitudes and along the circum Antarctic Ocean , 2012, Acta Oceanologica Sinica.

[17]  E. Szeląg-Wasielewska,et al.  Auto- and heterotrophic picoplankton in a lowland river (Warta River, Poland) , 2010 .

[18]  A. Marker The measurement of photosynthetic pigments in freshwaters and standardization of methods : conclusions and recommendations , 1980 .

[19]  C. Neal,et al.  Phosphorus uptake into algal biofilms in a lowland chalk river. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  J. Elliott,et al.  Is the future blue-green? A review of the current model predictions of how climate change could affect pelagic freshwater cyanobacteria. , 2012, Water research.

[21]  Jordi Catalan,et al.  Suitability of Flow Cytometry for Estimating Bacterial Biovolume in Natural Plankton Samples: Comparison with Microscopy Data , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  A. Méjean,et al.  Different Genotypes of Anatoxin-Producing Cyanobacteria Coexist in the Tarn River, France , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Declines in phosphorus concentration in the upper River Thames (UK): links to sewage effluent cleanup and extended end-member mixing analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Xuebo Qin,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton functional groups and its relationship with the environment in river: a case study in northeast China , 2012 .

[25]  Hans W Paerl,et al.  Blooms Bite the Hand That Feeds Them , 2013, Science.

[26]  E. Baurès,et al.  State of knowledge and concerns on cyanobacterial blooms and cyanotoxins. , 2013, Environment international.

[27]  R. Foy Variation in the reactive phosphorus concentrations in rivers of northwest Europe with respect to their potential to cause eutrophication , 2007 .

[28]  B. Haggard Phosphorus concentrations, loads, and sources within the Illinois River drainage area, northwest Arkansas, 1997-2008. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[29]  C Neal,et al.  Changes in water quality of the River Frome (UK) from 1965 to 2009: is phosphorus mitigation finally working? , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  C. Gallegos,et al.  Long-term Dynamics of Phytoplankton in the Rhode River, Maryland (USA) , 2010 .

[31]  H. Oh,et al.  Monitoring approaches for a toxic cyanobacterial bloom. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  M. D. Keller,et al.  MEDIA FOR THE CULTURE OF OCEANIC ULTRAPHYTOPLANKTON 1,2 , 1987 .

[33]  G. Andersen,et al.  The response of marine picoplankton to ocean acidification. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[34]  C. E. Davies,et al.  Lowland river water quality: a new UK data resource for process and environmental management analysis , 2012 .

[35]  Christian Wilhelm,et al.  Flow cytometric discrimination of various phycobilin-containing phytoplankton groups in a hypertrophic reservoir. , 2002, Cytometry.

[36]  Hans W. Paerl,et al.  Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Controls , 2013, Microbial Ecology.

[37]  R. Escribano,et al.  Bacterial response to a weak 2006 El Niño condition in an upwelling area of the Humboldt Current System , 2012, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[38]  U. Sommer,et al.  Phytoplankton Cell Size Reduction in Response to Warming Mediated by Nutrient Limitation , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  M. Bowes,et al.  Spatial and temporal changes in chlorophyll-a concentrations in the River Thames basin, UK: are phosphorus concentrations beginning to limit phytoplankton biomass? , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  D. B. Nedwell,et al.  Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  C. Nozais,et al.  Variations of the abundance and nucleic acid content of heterotrophic bacteria in Beaufort Shelf waters during winter and spring , 2008 .

[42]  J. Martin,et al.  Contribution of flow cytometry to estimate picoplankton biomass in estuarine systems , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[43]  Josep M. Gasol,et al.  Using flow cytometry for counting natural planktonic bacteria and understanding the structure of planktonic bacterial communities , 2000 .

[44]  D. Vaulot,et al.  Diel variability of photosynthetic picoplankton in the equatorial Pacific , 1999 .

[45]  Jordi Catalan,et al.  The relationship between phytoplankton biovolume and chlorophyll in a deep oligotrophic lake: decoupling in their spatial and temporal maxima , 2000 .

[46]  R. Jonker,et al.  High frequency monitoring reveals phytoplankton dynamics. , 2004, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[47]  T. J. Lack,et al.  Quantitative studies on the phytoplankton of the Rivers Thames and Kennet at Reading , 1971 .

[48]  Yonghong Bi,et al.  Responses of phytoplankton functional groups to the hydrologic regime in the Daning River, a tributary of Three Gorges Reservoir, China. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Optimizing Optical Flow Cytometry for Cell Volume-Based Sorting and Analysis , 2011, PloS one.