Social risk management and the World Bank: resetting the ‘standards’ for social security?

Global ‘standards’ in social security are set by the UN Specialist Agency, the International Labour Organization (ILO). The ILO ‘Standards’ prioritize one model of social security system in particular; namely, contributions‐financed social insurance. Specifically, social insurance systems are designed to mitigate the negative impacts of formal labour market risks. Accordingly, social security systems typically fail to address adequately many informal labour market and nonlabour market risks. The inherently limited focus of social protection provided by many social security systems is recognized to be of major concern for least developed countries (LDCs) in particular for whom western‐centric definitions of life‐cycle risk remain largely inappropriate for the majority. This realization has led the World Bank to experiment with a reconceptualized definition of social protection; Social Risk Management (SRM). Seeking to encourage wider debate across the multidisciplinary field of risk management research, this article outlines critically the tenets underpinning SRM and highlights the policy limitations of this innovative World Bank venture in two key respects. First, by outlining the likely policy implications of World Bank approaches to social protection for global social security standards and practice. Second, by questioning the short‐term contribution that SRM can make to poverty reduction, not least amongst the elderly poor.

[1]  R. Bendokat.  A social protection strategy for Togo , 1999 .

[2]  Christine Weigand,et al.  Social Policy as Social Risk Management , 2000 .

[3]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Hunger and Public Action. , 1991 .

[4]  J. Nyerere.  Are universal social standards possible , 1999 .

[5]  B. Pieris,et al.  Social Security Schemes in Southern Africa: An Overview and Proposals for Future Development , 1999 .

[6]  R. Holzmann,et al.  Social Protection Discussion Paper Series Social Risk Management : A New Conceptual Framework for Social Protection and Beyond , 2000 .

[7]  Paul B. Siegel,et al.  Social Protection Discussion Paper Series An Asset-Based Approach to Social Risk Management : A Conceptual Framework , 2002 .

[8]  R. Holzmann,et al.  Social Protection Discussion Paper Series Social Protection as Social Risk Management : Conceptual Underpinnings for the Social Protection Sector Strategy Paper , 1999 .

[9]  J. Copestake.  Microfinance and poverty reduction , 2005 .

[10]  J. Mashaw,et al.  True Security: Rethinking American Social Insurance , 1999 .

[11]  B. Fine.  The Developmental State Is Dead—Long Live Social Capital? , 1999 .

[12]  F. Lund,et al.  Pensions and Development: Social Security as Complementary to Programmes of Reconstruction and Development , 1995 .

[13]  R. Charlton,et al.  Pensions in Development , 2001 .

[14]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk , 1999 .

[15]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Editorial: Human capital and human capability , 1997 .

[16]  David A Nissan,et al.  A capital idea : start-up grants for young people , 2000 .

[17]  D. Hamilton.  Assets and the Poor: A New American Welfare Policy , 1992 .

[18]  Anne L. Alstott.  Stakeholder Society , 1999 .

[19]  M. Sherraden,et al.  Assets and the Poor: New American Welfare Policy , 1990 .

[20]  R. Beattie.  Social protection for all: But how? , 2000 .

[21]  F. Block,et al.  Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies , 2001 .

[22]  F. Ellis.  Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification , 1998 .

[23]  P. Taylor-Gooby,et al.  Dependency Culture: The Explosion of a Myth , 1992 .