Magnitude adjustment for AHP benefit/cost ratios

Abstract A feature of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) that has not been subject to close scrutiny is its use for benefit/cost analysis. If benefit priorities are divided by project costs to yield benefit points per dollar, then the resulting numbers can be used to allocate program budgets. But if benefit priorities and cost priorities are derived from two separate hierarchies, then it is likely that the ratio of benefit priorities to cost priorities produces misleading results. To correct the situation, adjustments must be made to put the numerator and denominator priorities into commensurate terms.

[1]  W. Wedley,et al.  Ambiguous Criteria Weights in AHP: Consequences and Solutions* , 1989 .

[2]  I. Azis Analytic hierarchy process in the benefit−cost framework: a post-evaluation of the Trans-Sumatra highway project , 1990 .

[3]  J. Dyer Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[4]  W. A. Clayton,et al.  Benefit cost analysis of riverboat gambling , 1993 .

[5]  John R. Canada,et al.  SOME PROBLEMS IN USING BENEFIT'COST RATIOS WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 1990 .

[6]  Edward M. Gramlich,et al.  Benefit-cost analysis of government programs , 1981 .

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Knapsack allocation of multiple resources in benefit-cost analysis by way of the analytic hierarchy process , 1993 .

[8]  Sr Watson,et al.  Assesing Attribute Weights , 1982 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP. The most livable cities in the United States , 1986 .

[10]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1972 .

[11]  T. Saaty What is relative measurement? The ratio scale phantom , 1993 .

[12]  Valerie Belton,et al.  On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies , 1983 .

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[15]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[16]  E. Choo,et al.  A UNIFIED APPROACH TO AHP WITH LINKING PINS , 1993 .