Multiple Midfrontal Thetas Revealed by Source Separation of Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Theta-band (∼6 Hz) rhythmic activity within and over the medial PFC (“midfrontal theta”) has been identified as a distinctive signature of “response conflict,” the competition between multiple actions when only one action is goal-relevant. Midfrontal theta is traditionally conceptualized and analyzed under the assumption that it is a unitary signature of conflict that can be uniquely identified at one electrode (typically FCz). Here we recorded simultaneous MEG and EEG (total of 328 sensors) in 9 human subjects (7 female) and applied a feature-guided multivariate source-separation decomposition to determine whether conflict-related midfrontal theta is a unitary or multidimensional feature of the data. For each subject, a generalized eigendecomposition yielded spatial filters (components) that maximized the ratio between theta and broadband activity. Components were retained based on significance thresholding and midfrontal EEG topography. All of the subjects individually exhibited multiple (mean 5.89, SD 2.47) midfrontal components that contributed to sensor-level midfrontal theta power during the task. Component signals were temporally uncorrelated and asynchronous, suggesting that each midfrontal theta component was unique. Our findings call into question the dominant notion that midfrontal theta represents a unitary process. Instead, we suggest that midfrontal theta spans a multidimensional space, indicating multiple origins, but can manifest as a single feature at the sensor level because of signal mixing. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT “Midfrontal theta” is a rhythmic electrophysiological signature of the competition between multiple response options. Midfrontal theta is traditionally considered to reflect a single process. However, this assumption could be erroneous because of “mixing” (multiple sources contributing to the activity recorded at a single electrode). We investigated the dimensionality of midfrontal theta by applying advanced multivariate analysis methods to a multimodal MEG/EEG dataset. We identified multiple topographically overlapping neural sources that drove response conflict-related midfrontal theta. Midfrontal theta thus reflects multiple uncorrelated signals that manifest with similar EEG scalp projections. In addition to contributing to the cognitive control literature, we demonstrate both the feasibility and the necessity of signal demixing to understand the narrowband neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes.

[1]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[2]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Frontal Oscillatory Dynamics Predict Feedback Learning and Action Adjustment , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  Scanning for oscillations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[5]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Where Does EEG Come From and What Does It Mean? , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Theta Dynamics Reveal Domain-specific Control over Stimulus and Response Conflict , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  The breakdown of the Simon effect in cross‐modal contexts: EEG evidence , 2018, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: A short review. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Xiao-Jing Wang Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. , 2010, Physiological reviews.

[12]  R. Nigbur,et al.  Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[14]  M. Woldorff,et al.  The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Binding by Random Bursts: A Computational Model of Cognitive Control , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Mario Liotti,et al.  Is conflict monitoring supramodal? Spatiotemporal dynamics of cognitive control processes in an auditory Stroop task , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[18]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Subthreshold muscle twitches dissociate oscillatory neural signatures of conflicts from errors , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[23]  Bernhard Pastötter,et al.  Oscillatory correlates of controlled speed‐accuracy tradeoff in a response‐conflict task , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[24]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  EEG Source Reconstruction Reveals Frontal-Parietal Dynamics of Spatial Conflict Processing , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  T. Jung,et al.  Two Independent Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations during Conflict Detection and Adaptation in a Simon-Type Manual Reaching Task , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Kahana,et al.  Theta returns , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Multivariate cross-frequency coupling via generalized eigendecomposition , 2017, bioRxiv.

[28]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Comparison of linear spatial filters for identifying oscillatory activity in multichannel data , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[31]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  The Electrophysiological Dynamics of Interference during the Stroop Task , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Sarnthein,et al.  Persistent hippocampal neural firing and hippocampal-cortical coupling predict verbal working memory load , 2019, Science Advances.

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[35]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[36]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Identifying reliable independent components via split-half comparisons , 2009, NeuroImage.

[37]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[38]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Rhythmic entrainment source separation: Optimizing analyses of neural responses to rhythmic sensory stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. Frank,et al.  Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Ned T. Sahin,et al.  Dynamic circuit motifs underlying rhythmic gain control, gating and integration , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Bernhard Pastötter,et al.  Dynamic Adjustments of Cognitive Control: Oscillatory Correlates of the Conflict Adaptation Effect , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[43]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .