Receptor crosstalk improves concentration sensing of multiple ligands

Cells need to reliably sense external ligand concentrations to achieve various biological functions such as chemotaxis or signaling. The molecular recognition of ligands by surface receptors is degenerate in many systems, leading to crosstalk between ligand-receptor pairs. Crosstalk is often thought of as a deviation from optimal specific recognition, as the binding of noncognate ligands can interfere with the detection of the receptor's cognate ligand, possibly leading to a false triggering of a downstream signaling pathway. Here we quantify the optimal precision of sensing the concentrations of multiple ligands by a collection of promiscuous receptors. We demonstrate that crosstalk can improve precision in concentration sensing and discrimination tasks. To achieve superior precision, the additional information about ligand concentrations contained in short binding events of the noncognate ligand should be exploited. We present a proofreading scheme to realize an approximate estimation of multiple ligand concentrations that reaches a precision close to the derived optimal bounds. Our results help rationalize the observed ubiquity of receptor crosstalk in molecular sensing.

[1]  Andrew Mugler,et al.  Cooperative Clustering Digitizes Biochemical Signaling and Enhances its Fidelity. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Paul François,et al.  Phenotypic spandrel: absolute discrimination and ligand antagonism , 2015, bioRxiv.

[3]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Optimal resource allocation in cellular sensing systems , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[5]  Andrew K. Sewell,et al.  Why must T cells be cross-reactive? , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[6]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Physical Limit to Concentration Sensing Amid Spurious Ligands. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[7]  M. Laub,et al.  Specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. , 2007, Annual review of genetics.

[8]  S. Akira,et al.  Pathogen Recognition and Innate Immunity , 2006, Cell.

[9]  R. Nusse,et al.  Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development. , 1998, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[10]  Paul François,et al.  Chemodetection in fluctuating environments: Receptor coupling, buffering, and antagonism , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Combinatorial Signal Perception in the BMP Pathway , 2017, Cell.

[12]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Effects of receptor correlations on molecular information transmission. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[14]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Energy dissipation and noise correlations in biochemical sensing. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[15]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Fundamental Limits to Cellular Sensing , 2015, 1505.06577.

[16]  W. Rappel,et al.  Receptor noise and directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[17]  Andrew Mugler,et al.  Optimal Prediction by Cellular Signaling Networks. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[18]  J. Nickel,et al.  Promiscuity and specificity in BMP receptor activation , 2012, FEBS letters.

[19]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  The energy-speed-accuracy tradeoff in sensory adaptation , 2012, Nature Physics.

[20]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  How a well-adapted immune system is organized , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Eric D. Siggia,et al.  Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[24]  F. Tostevin,et al.  The Berg-Purcell limit revisited. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[25]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  W. Rappel,et al.  Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[27]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Know the Single-Receptor Sensing Limit? Think Again , 2015, Journal of statistical physics.

[28]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  David J Schwab,et al.  Energetic costs of cellular computation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Thermodynamics of statistical inference by cells. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[31]  L. Buck,et al.  Combinatorial Receptor Codes for Odors , 1999, Cell.

[32]  P. Murray The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway: Input and Output Integration1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Coding of Odors by a Receptor Repertoire , 2006, Cell.

[35]  Paul François,et al.  Principles of adaptive sorting revealed by in silico evolution. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[36]  Ilya Nemenman,et al.  On the Sufficiency of Pairwise Interactions in Maximum Entropy Models of Networks , 2015, Journal of Statistical Physics.

[37]  Paul François,et al.  Phenotypic model for early T-cell activation displaying sensitivity, specificity, and antagonism , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Andre C. Barato,et al.  Efficiency of cellular information processing , 2014, 1405.7241.

[39]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Dynamics of cooperativity in chemical sensing among cell-surface receptors. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[40]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Limits to the precision of gradient sensing with spatial communication and temporal integration , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  P. Alam ‘W’ , 2021, Composites Engineering.

[42]  W. Rappel,et al.  Receptor noise limitations on chemotactic sensing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  R Vermeulen Environmental sensing: sense and sensibility , 2019 .

[44]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to biochemical signaling. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[46]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Role of spatial averaging in multicellular gradient sensing , 2015, Physical biology.

[47]  T. Mora,et al.  Limits of sensing temporal concentration changes by single cells. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[48]  Emergent versus Individual-Based Multicellular Chemotaxis. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[49]  Andrew Mugler,et al.  Fundamental Limits to Collective Concentration Sensing in Cell Populations. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[50]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Cell-Specific Information Processing in Segregating Populations of Eph Receptor Ephrin–Expressing Cells , 2009, Science.

[51]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Environmental sensing, information transfer, and cellular decision-making. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[52]  S. Akira,et al.  Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. , 2011, Immunity.

[53]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Maximum likelihood and the single receptor. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[54]  Ilya Nemenman,et al.  Simple biochemical networks allow accurate sensing of multiple ligands with a single receptor , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  D. Mason,et al.  A very high level of crossreactivity is an essential feature of the T-cell receptor. , 1998, Immunology today.

[56]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Disorder and the Neural Representation of Complex Odors , 2017, bioRxiv.