Systematic Building of Conceptual Classification Systems with C-KAT

C-KAT is a method and a tool which supports the design of “feature oriented” classification systems. During the design of these systems, one is very often confronted with the problem of the “calculation of the attribute cross-product”. It arises because the examination of the dependency and compatibility relations between the attributes leads to the need to generate the cross-product of their features. The C-KAT method uses a specialised Heuristic Classification conceptual model named “classification by structural shift” which sees the classification process as the matching of different classifications of the same set of objects or situations organised around different structural principles. To manage the complexity induced by the cross-product, C-KAT supports the use of a least commitment strategy which applies in a context of constraint-directed reasoning. The method is presented using a detailed example from the field of industrial fire-insurance.

[1]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Conceptual models of interactive knowledge acquisition tools , 1989 .

[2]  Bonnie D Fraser Knowledge Acquisition Methodology. , 1987 .

[3]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[4]  Michael J. Freiling,et al.  Ontological Analysis: An Ongoing Experiment , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[5]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Expertise Transfer and Complex Problems: Using AQUINAS as a Knowledge-Acquisition Workbench for Knowledge-Based Systems , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  M.-O. Cordier,et al.  Comment enrichir un modèle de résolution , 1992 .

[7]  Mildred L. G. Shaw,et al.  On Becoming a Personal Scientist: Interactive Computer Elicitation of Personal Models of the World , 1980 .

[8]  Gary Kahn MORE: From Observing Knowledge Engineers to Automating Knowledge Acquisition , 1988 .

[9]  John H. Boose,et al.  Personal Construct Theory and the Transfer of Human Expertise , 1984, AAAI.

[10]  Gilles Kassel,et al.  An Approach to Operationalize Conceptual Models: The Shell Aide , 1992, EKAW.

[11]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition Tools for Expert Systems , 1988 .

[12]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Heuristic Classification , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  (ML)2: A Formal Language for KADS Models , 1992, ECAI.

[14]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Knowledge acquisition as a process of model refinement , 1990 .

[15]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[16]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Current Developments in Knowledge Acquisition — EKAW '92 , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  G. Bachelard,et al.  Le Pluralisme cohérent de la chimie moderne , 1932 .

[18]  Oleg I. Larichev,et al.  A New Approach to the Solution of Expert Classification Problems , 1992, EKAW.

[19]  Karsten Poeck,et al.  Common Ground and Differences of the KADS and Strong-Problem-Solving-Shell Approach , 1992, EKAW.

[20]  Larry Eshelman,et al.  MOLE: A Knowledge-Acquisition Tool for Cover-and-Differentiate Systems , 1988 .

[21]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .