Interim Performance Evaluation in Contract Design

This paper examines the desirability of having an interim performance evaluation (IPE) in the design of an optimal contract. While enabling the principal to plan and control the project process better, the IPE may also adversely affect the agent’s morale in case of unfavorable IPE outcome. Despite this, we show that it is without loss of generality using contracts that tailor effort or payment to the IPE result when it involves objective measures. In the environment in which it involves subjective measures, not using IPE may be in the principal’s interest; the reason is that the contract now features a progressive payment scheme that renders extra costs upon information disclosure.

[1]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Personnel psychology: performance evaluation and pay for performance. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Bernard Salanié Testing Contract Theory , 2003 .

[3]  Anders U. Poulsen,et al.  Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[4]  Optimal Incentives and the Time Dimension of Performance Measurement , 2009 .

[5]  Tony Juncaj Do Performance Appraisals Work , 2002 .

[6]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives , 1995 .

[7]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. , 1991 .

[8]  Collusion and Renegotiation in Principal-Supervisor-Agent Models ∗ , 2006 .

[9]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Deception and Incentives: How Dishonesty Undermines Effort Provision , 2007 .

[10]  William Fuchs,et al.  Contracting with Repeated Moral Hazard and Private Evaluations , 2006 .

[11]  N. Doherty,et al.  Adverse Selection, Commitment, and Renegotiation: Extension to and Evidence from Insurance Markets , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  J. Hattie,et al.  The Power of Feedback , 2007 .

[13]  Florian Ederer,et al.  Feedback and Motivation in Dynamic Tournaments , 2010 .

[14]  Huseyin Yildirim,et al.  Contests with multiple rounds , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  M. David The Theory of Incentives , 2006 .

[16]  Jacques Crémer,et al.  Arm's Length Relationships , 1995 .

[17]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Cities , 2007 .

[18]  David G Bjerke,et al.  Officer Fitness Report Evaluation Study , 1987 .

[19]  W. MacLeod,et al.  On Optimal Contracting with Subjective Evaluation , 2001 .

[20]  Masaki Aoyagi,et al.  Information Feedback in a Dynamic Tournament , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[21]  T. Bewley Why Wages Don't Fall during a Recession , 1999 .

[22]  Robert A. Miller,et al.  Managerial Compensation and the Cost of Moral Hazard , 2000 .

[23]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent-Seeking and Inefficient Investment , 1997 .

[24]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Optimal Incentives for Teams , 2001 .

[25]  A. Kluger,et al.  Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? , 2000 .

[26]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. , 1989 .

[27]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance , 1989 .

[28]  T. Bewley,et al.  A Depressed Labor Market as Explained by Participants , 1995 .

[29]  Hideshi Itoh,et al.  Moral Hazard and Renegotiation with Multiple Agents , 1998, The Review of Economic Studies.

[30]  Nagore Iriberri,et al.  The provision of relative performance feedback information: An experimental analysis of performance and happiness , 2010 .

[31]  Motty Perry,et al.  Tournaments with midterm reviews , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[32]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[33]  Alessandro Lizzeri,et al.  The Incentive Effects of Interim Performance Evaluations , 2002 .

[34]  Margaret E. Slade,et al.  Multitask Agency and Contract Choice: An Empirical Exploration , 1996 .

[35]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[36]  Mary Jenkins,et al.  Abolishing Performance Appraisals: Why They Backfire and What to Do Instead , 2000 .

[37]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions , 2005 .

[38]  M. Strober,et al.  Fear of feedback. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[39]  Korok Ray The Retention Effect of Withholding Performance Information , 2007 .

[40]  Canice Prendergast The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[41]  Johnathan Roberts,et al.  The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .

[42]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Relational Incentive Contracts , 2003 .

[43]  Interim Performance Evaluation in Contract Design , 2011 .

[44]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[45]  Maria Goltsman,et al.  Interim Performance Feedback in Multistage Tournaments: The Optimality of Partial Disclosure , 2011, Journal of Labor Economics.

[46]  Renegotiation and Collusion in Organizations , 2000 .

[47]  R. Gibbons,et al.  The Handbook of Organizational Economics , 2012 .

[48]  Gustavo Manso Motivating Innovation , 2010 .

[49]  P. Bolton,et al.  Corporate Finance, the Theory of the Firm, and Organizations , 1998 .

[50]  Juan José Ganuza,et al.  Wild Bids. Gambling for Resurrection in Procurement Contracts , 2002 .

[51]  Productive low morale , 2009 .