Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes.

Road crashes tend to be infrequent but with nontrivial consequences, leading to a long-running interest in identifying surrogate events, such as traffic conflicts, that can support a timely recognition and correction of safety deficiencies. Although a variety of possible surrogates have been suggested, questions remain regarding how crashes and surrogates are related. Using recent developments in causal analysis we propose a simple model which represents crashes and conflicts as resulting from interactions between initiating conditions and evasive actions, and then use this model to identify relationships between these types of events. Our first set of results expresses the probability of a crash as a mixture of probabilities over different sets of initiating conditions, where the mixing probabilities are governed by the evasive action. Our second set of results considers situations where sampling is restricted to non-crash events, and gives conditions where these truncated probabilities can serve as proxies for crash probabilities. We then illustrate how trajectory-based reconstruction can be used to classify initiating events with respect to severity, and to estimate a proxy for the crash probability from a set of incompletely observed non-crash events.

[1]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Traffic conflicts and exposure , 1982 .

[2]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Traffic accident prediction using 3-D model-based vehicle tracking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Evaluation of an Automotive Rear-End Collision Avoidance System , 2006 .

[4]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for the Automated Analysis of the Exposure to Road Collision , 2008 .

[5]  C. Hydén,et al.  Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  C. Hydén,et al.  The Swedish Traffic-Conflicts Technique , 1984 .

[7]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[8]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Feasibility of Driver Judgment as Basis for a Crash Avoidance Database , 2002 .

[9]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial Accident Prevention: a Scientific Approach , 1951 .

[10]  Gary A Davis,et al.  Collective responsibility for freeway rear-ending accidents? An application of probabilistic casual models. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Towards a unified approach to causal analysis in traffic safety using structural causal models , 2002 .

[12]  E Hauer,et al.  Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Michael A. P. Taylor.  TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY IN THE 21ST CENTURY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY, ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA, 16-18 JULY 2002 , 2002 .

[14]  G. Davis,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF A VEHICLE/PEDESTRIAN COLLISION MODEL FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL , 2002 .

[15]  H C Joksch,et al.  A BRIDGING ANALYSIS FOR ESTIMATING THE BENEFITS OF ACTIVE SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES , 1996 .

[16]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Statistical versus Simulation Models in Safety , 2009 .

[17]  Christer Hydén,et al.  Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[19]  Edward A. Brill.  A Car-Following Model Relating Reaction Times and Temporal Headways to Accident Frequency , 1972 .

[20]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Empirical Methods in Support of Crash Avoidance Model Building and Benefits Estimation , 1999, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[21]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[22]  V. A. Güttinger,et al.  Conflict Observation in Theory and in Practice , 1984 .

[23]  Praprut Songchitruksa,et al.  The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[25]  Stuart R Perkins,et al.  Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections , 1968 .

[26]  P. J. Cooper,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS IN CANADA WITH EMPHASIS ON "POST ENCROACHMENT TIME" TECHNIQUES .INTERNATIONAL CALIBRATION STUDY OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATO ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP , 1984 .