Effects of Multi-Genre Digital Game-Based Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argumentation Skills, and Learning Experiences

Studies have shown that although traditional instruction is effective in developing students’ conceptual understanding, it lacks in strengthening their thinking skills. To enhance traditional instruction and establish an approach using game-based instruction, this study developed Multi-genre digital Game-based Instruction (MGI), which integrates various game genres—situated and competitive—with traditional instruction. A total of 115 fourth-graders (9–10 years old) of 4 classes participated in the study, of which 2 classes made up the MGI (experimental) group and the other 2, the traditional instruction (control) group. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to answer research questions by examining the comparative effectiveness of the two groups separately as well as the effectiveness by achievement level, and exploring students’ learning experiences. Findings showed that using MGI resulted in a significant improvement in conceptual understanding and argumentation skills compared to those who were taught only with traditional instruction. Furthermore, it showed that MGI was significantly more effective than traditional instruction in improving low-achieving students’ conceptual understanding, as well as improving argumentation skills for all achievement levels. Students’ learning experiences with MGI showed how the proposed instruction is superior compared to existing traditional instruction.

[1]  Hsiang-Ping Chen,et al.  The Influence of an Educational Computer Game on Children's Cultural Identities , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Sherry Y. Chen,et al.  The Effects of Game-Based Learning on Mathematical Confidence and Performance: High Ability vs. Low Ability , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Michael D. Proctor,et al.  A survey of exemplar teachers' perceptions, use, and access of computer-based games and technology for classroom instruction , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[4]  P. Wouters,et al.  A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games , 2013 .

[5]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students , 2013 .

[6]  Janet Mannheimer Zydney,et al.  Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Insu Paek,et al.  Game-based learning in an OpenSim-supported virtual environment on perceived motivational quality of learning , 2017 .

[8]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[9]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[10]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[11]  Erol Özçelik,et al.  The effect of competition on learning in games , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[13]  Amanda Wilson,et al.  A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Zhidong Zhang,et al.  Scaffolding argumentation in intact class: Integrating technology and pedagogy , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Maya Israel,et al.  A multilevel analysis of diverse learners playing life science video games: Interactions between game content, learning disability status, reading proficiency, and gender , 2016 .

[16]  Yu-Ling Lu,et al.  Are They Learning or Playing? Students’ Perception Traits and Their Learning Self-Efficacy in a Game-Based Learning Environment , 2019, Journal of Educational Computing Research.

[17]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[18]  Karin Baier,et al.  The Uses Of Argument , 2016 .

[19]  S. Simon.  Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science , 2008 .

[20]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice , 2009 .

[21]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[22]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[23]  Siew Hock Ow,et al.  A Digital Game-Based Learning Method to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary Science , 2019, IEEE Access.

[24]  James C. Lester,et al.  Enhancing 5th graders' science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Dominik Petko,et al.  Comparing Serious Games and Educational Simulations: Effects on Enjoyment, Deep Thinking, Interest and Cognitive Learning Gains , 2018, Simulation & Gaming.

[26]  J. C. Herz,et al.  Joystick Nation: How Videogames Ate Our Quarters, Won Our Hearts, and Rewired Our Minds , 1997 .

[27]  Azita Iliya Abdul Jabbar,et al.  Gameplay Engagement and Learning in Game-Based Learning , 2015 .

[28]  T. L. Kelley.  The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. , 1939 .

[29]  C. P. Constantinou,et al.  Supporting Use of Evidence in Argumentation through Practice in Argumentation and Reflection in the Context of SOCRATES Learning Environment , 2015 .

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[31]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning , 1997 .

[32]  Hsiao-Lin Tuan,et al.  Argumentation in a Socioscientific Context and its Influence on Fundamental and Derived Science Literacies , 2016 .

[33]  M. O’Loughlin,et al.  Rethinking science education: Beyond piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning† , 2007 .

[34]  A. Maslow.  A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[35]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[36]  Meng-Tzu Cheng,et al.  The use of serious games in science education: a review of selected empirical research from 2002 to 2013 , 2015 .

[37]  R. Mayer.  Towards a science of motivated learning in technology-supported environments , 2011 .

[38]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning and games. , 2011 .

[39]  Chi-Jui Lien,et al.  Learning environments with different levels of technological engagement: a comparison of game-based, video-based, and traditional instruction on students’ learning , 2019, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[40]  Siew Hock Ow,et al.  Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Elementary Science Learning: A Systematic Review , 2019, IEEE Access.

[41]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Transformational Play as a Curricular Scaffold: Using Videogames to Support Science Education , 2009 .

[42]  Fu-Yun Yu,et al.  Development and evaluation of multiple competitive activities in a synchronous quiz game system , 2003 .

[43]  Rihard Karba,et al.  Remote Multivariable Control Design Using a Competition Game , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[44]  Nuria Medina-Medina,et al.  A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Serious Games , 2017 .

[45]  Chun-Yen Tsai,et al.  Improving Students' PISA Scientific Competencies Through Online Argumentation , 2015 .

[46]  William L. Romine,et al.  Game-Based Curricula in Biology Classes: Differential Effects among Varying Academic Levels , 2013 .

[47]  J. Keller.  What is Motivational Design , 2010 .

[48]  Jeffrey Earp,et al.  An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games , 2016, Comput. Educ..