This paper develops the idea of "the authority of experience" to explain the unease about teacher education represented in comments of 19 graduate students enrolled in a preservice physics education methods course which combined on-campus classes and teaching placements. Interviews with the student teachers after the first half of the year-long course are organized under four themes: expectations about learning to teach, observation skills, the credibility of a professor who teaches every day, and overall perspectives on teacher education. The study found that teacher education is a transition from being under authority to being in authority, and this is an uneasy transition: some students wished to be told what to do when they assume authority, and some did not; some students saw no point to classes that did not speak directly to what to do as teachers, and others found such discussions appealing; some found the professor to be authoritative because he was also teaching secondary school physics, while others found his colleagues no less credible for other reasons. The paper recommends that the authority of experience be brought to the surface so that it is not ignored by students. This can be accomplished through metaphor, life histories, narrative, and journals. (Contains 18 references.) (JDD) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** THE AUTHORITY OF EXPERIENCE IN LEARNING TO TEACH: MESSAGES FROM A PHYSICS METHODS CLASS' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Once or Educational Research and linorovemen1 EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC, 0 This documenl has teen reoroduce<, as recotved from Me person or organisation originating et 0 Minor changes neve bean made ro improve reprOduCtiOn Quality POints Of view Or OcsnionS Slated in MIS dccumerit do r.ol necessarily represenl official OERI position or policy Hugh Munby and Tom Russell Faculty of Education Queen's University Kingston, Ontario Canada K7L 3N6 Introduction "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATE IAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
[1]
M. Pajares,et al.
Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct
,
1992
.
[2]
Donald A. Schön.
The Reflective turn : case studies in and on educational practice
,
1991
.
[3]
Tom Russell.
Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse: Can teachers' questions distort scientific authority?
,
1983
.
[4]
S. Brookhart,et al.
Characteristics of Entering Teacher Candidates
,
1992
.
[5]
D. Kagan.
Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers
,
1992
.
[6]
D. Schoen.
Educating the reflective practitioner
,
1987
.
[7]
Tom Russell,et al.
Educating the reflective teacher: an essay review of two books by Donald Schon
,
1989
.
[8]
Nedra A. Crow,et al.
Emerging As a Teacher
,
1992
.
[9]
Donald A. Schön,et al.
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.
,
1987
.
[10]
Tom Russell,et al.
Reflective teacher education: Technique or epistemology?
,
1993
.
[11]
How US Preservice Teachers ‘Read’ Classroom Performances
,
1992
.
[12]
D. Schoen,et al.
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
,
1985
.
[13]
Douglas R. Barnes.
From communication to curriculum
,
1976
.
[14]
Linda R. Valli,et al.
Reflective teacher education : cases and critiques
,
1992
.