The Current Status and Future Applicability of Quantitative Structure–activity Relationships (QSARs) in Predicting Toxicity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Contrera,et al. A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[2] J. Dearden,et al. QSAR in Toxicology. 1. Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity , 1995 .
[3] E Gottmann,et al. Data quality in predictive toxicology: identification of chemical structures and calculation of chemical properties. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.
[4] D MacDonald,et al. Uses and limitations of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) to categorize substances on the Canadian domestic substance list as persistent and/or bioaccumulative, and inherently toxic to non-human organisms , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[5] R Purdy,et al. A mechanism-mediated model for carcinogenicity: model content and prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 25 organic chemicals. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.
[6] M. Cronin,et al. Computational methods for the prediction of drug toxicity. , 2000, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[7] A.M. Richard,et al. AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: Survey and status report , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[8] John D. Walker,et al. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.
[9] C Helma,et al. Data quality in predictive toxicology: reproducibility of rodent carcinogenicity experiments. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.
[10] R Benigni,et al. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of aromatic amines: a quantitative structure-activity relationships model. , 2001, Carcinogenesis.