Reinforcing preliminary design strategy selection guidelines with insight from Fogg's behaviour grid

In 2010, Zachrisson & Boks presented a set of preliminary guidelines for when different types of design strategies should be applied, according to information about the user and the context [1]. This paper describes an investigation of how these guidelines may be reinforced by combining them with insight about the selection of design strategies from Fogg's behaviour grid [2]. The conclusion is that the suggestions from Fogg's behaviour grid of requirements for behaviour change according to the type of change, and the sequence to address these requirements, may add valuable insight to the guidelines. In addition, there are some factors affecting behaviour that are not covered by the guidelines, which could be included.

[1]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[2]  C. Klöckner,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE ACTION DETERMINATION MODEL , 2013 .

[3]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[4]  C. Boks,et al.  How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: the environmental implications , 2005, 2005 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[5]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour : is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? , 1999 .

[6]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Design with Intent: 101 patterns for influencing behaviour through design , 2010 .

[7]  Wander Jager,et al.  Human decision making and environmental perception: Understanding and assisting human decision making in real-life settings : liber amicorum for Charles Vlek , 2003 .

[8]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[9]  Tim Jackson.  Motivating Sustainable Consumption , 2008 .

[10]  Han Brezet,et al.  Ecodesign : a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption , 1997 .

[11]  C. Klöckner,et al.  Problems of Operationalizing Habits and Integrating Habits in Normative Decision‐Making Models1 , 2003 .

[12]  Persuasive Technology and Moral Responsibility Toward an ethical framework for persuasive technologies , 2006 .

[13]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Interventions to Break and Create Consumer Habits , 2006 .

[14]  W. Jager.  Breaking 'bad habits': a dynamical perspective on habit formation and change , 2003 .

[15]  C. Klöckner,et al.  Two Pieces of the Same Puzzle? Script‐Based Car Choice Habits Between the Influence of Socialization and Past Behavior1 , 2012 .

[16]  T. S. Robertson.  The Process of Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovation , 1967 .

[17]  Carmen Tanner,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[18]  T. Bhamra,et al.  Towards instinctive sustainable product use , 2005 .

[19]  Henk Aarts,et al.  Breaking and creating habits on the working floor : A field- experiment on the power of implementation intentions , 2006 .

[20]  Casper Boks,et al.  When to apply different design for sustainable behaviour strategies , 2010 .

[21]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan , 2006 .

[22]  Jaap Jelsma,et al.  Designing environmentally efficient services; a ‘script’ approach , 2002 .

[23]  Casper Boks,et al.  The ethics in balancing control and freedom when engineering solutions for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[24]  Edward Elias,et al.  The Potential for Domestic Energy Savings through Assessing User Behaviour and Changes in Design , 2007 .

[25]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[26]  C. Klöckner,et al.  How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice , 2004 .

[27]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Modelling the user: how design for sustainable behaviour can reveal different stakeholder perspectives on human nature , 2010 .

[28]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design , 2005 .

[29]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[30]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[31]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study , 2002 .