Technical Evaluation of a Third Generation Optical Pose Tracker for Motion Analysis and Image-Guided Surgery

Laparoscopic instrument tracking systems are an essential component in image-guided interventions and offer new possibilities to improve and automate objective assessment methods of surgical skills. In this study we present our system design to apply a third generation optical pose tracker (Micron- Tracker®) to laparoscopic practice. A technical evaluation of this design is performed in order to analyze its accuracy in computing the laparoscopic instrument tip position. Results show a stable fluctuation error over the entire analyzed workspace. The relative position errors are 1.776±1.675 mm, 1.817±1.762 mm, 1.854±1.740 mm, 2.455±2.164 mm, 2.545±2.496 mm, 2.764±2.342 mm, 2.512±2.493 mm for distances of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 mm, respectively. The accumulated distance error increases with the measured distance. The instrument inclination covered by the system is high, from 90 to 7.5 degrees. The system reports a low positional accuracy for the instrument tip.

[1]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Comparative assessment of optical tracking systems for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  E. Verdaasdonk,et al.  Objective assessment of technical surgical skills , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  Douglas P. Perrin,et al.  Image guided surgical interventions. , 2009, Current problems in surgery.

[4]  R M Kirk,et al.  Training of surgeons. , 1972, British medical journal.

[5]  Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo,et al.  Preliminary results with a training program for thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation therapy , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  M. Figl,et al.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[7]  Enrique J. Gómez,et al.  Validation of SINERGIA as training tool: a randomized study to test the transfer of acquired basic psychomotor skills to LapMentor , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[9]  A C Nicol,et al.  Measuring the positional accuracy of computer assisted surgical tracking systems , 2010, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[10]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Laparoscopic Tool Tracking Method for Augmented Reality Surgical Applications , 2008, ISBMS.

[11]  José B. Pagador,et al.  Augmented reality haptic (ARH): an approach of electromagnetic tracking in minimally invasive surgery , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[12]  Enrique J Gómez,et al.  Video-based assistance system for training in minimally invasive surgery , 2011, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[13]  Jr. David C. Sabiston,et al.  THE TRAINING OF SURGEONS , 1988 .

[14]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[15]  Xiaoli Zhang,et al.  Application of visual tracking for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2002, J. Field Robotics.