Benefits and Obstacles to the Adoption of Reality Capture Technologies in the U.S. Commercial and Infrastructure Construction Sectors

Most previous Reality Capture Technology (RCT) research in construction focuses on the technical aspects of data collection, processing, and post-processing, while fewer studies have explored stakeholder perceptions about adopting and implementing RCT. This research investigated the perceptions of various construction project stakeholders in the commercial and infrastructure sectors regarding the benefits of, and obstacles hindering, the adoption of RCTs. A survey was distributed to the membership of U.S.-based professional organizations. Exploratory Factor Analysis was implemented to investigate and confirm logical and consistent empirical groupings of the benefits and obstacles listed in the survey. In general, mean comparisons revealed consistency across stakeholder perceptions of the benefits and obstacles of RCTs. However, significantly different perceptions about the increased accuracy of prefabricated elements, RCTs not being a company priority, lack of company budget, and data collection being too time consuming were observed between stakeholder groups. The study identified several benefits to RCT adoption (including, but not limited to, reduced project risk, increased accuracy of prefabricated elements and installed work as well as increased speed of as-built document creation) that were not noted in previous studies. Several obstacles to RCT (including, but not limited to, RCT not being a company priority, lack of Owner/Client demand, inability to bill RCT costs to the project, and cost of hiring employees with the required skills) were not observed in previous studies.

[1]  Hani Alzraiee,et al.  Case Study: Assessing the Structural Condition of Steel Bridges Using Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) , 2022, Construction Research Congress 2022.

[2]  Yongbo Yuan,et al.  Application of Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry , 2021, Sensors.

[3]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  Factors Influencing Adoption and Integration of Construction Robotics and Automation Technology in the US , 2021 .

[4]  Ryan Salameh,et al.  Adoption of 3D Laser Imaging Systems for Automated Pavement Condition Assessment in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities , 2021 .

[5]  Pingbo Tang,et al.  Planning for terrestrial laser scanning in construction: A review , 2021, Automation in Construction.

[6]  Armen N. Amirkhanian,et al.  Quality Management Technologies in Highway Construction: Stakeholders’ Perception of Utility, Benefits, and Barriers , 2021 .

[7]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Reality Capture of Buildings Using 3D Laser Scanners , 2021, CivilEng.

[8]  Craig M. Hancock,et al.  Development of low-cost mobile laser scanning for 3D construction indoor mapping by using inertial measurement unit, ultra-wide band and 2D laser scanner , 2019, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[9]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  BIM Use by Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry in Educational Facility Projects , 2019, Advances in Civil Engineering.

[10]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Automatic Recognition of Common Structural Elements from Point Clouds for Automated Progress Monitoring and Dimensional Quality Control in Reinforced Concrete Construction , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Qian Wang,et al.  Applications of 3D point cloud data in the construction industry: A fifteen-year review from 2004 to 2018 , 2019, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[12]  Sanghyo Lee,et al.  Empirical Study on Structural Safety Diagnosis of Large-Scale Civil Infrastructure Using Laser Scanning and BIM , 2018, Sustainability.

[13]  Beliz Ozorhon,et al.  Critical Success Factors of Building Information Modeling Implementation , 2017 .

[14]  Sara Shirowzhan,et al.  A Scanner Technology Acceptance Model for Construction Projects , 2017 .

[15]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Role of BIM and 3D Laser Scanning on Job sites from the Perspective of Construction Project Management Personnel , 2016 .

[16]  Manolis I. A. Lourakis,et al.  Automated as-built 3D reconstruction of civil infrastructure using computer vision: Achievements, opportunities, and challenges , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[17]  Jaehoon Jung,et al.  Productive modeling for development of as-built BIM of existing indoor structures , 2014 .

[18]  Ty A. Lasky,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mobile Terrestrial Laser Scanning Applications for Highway Infrastructure , 2014 .

[19]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  Imaged-based verification of as-built documentation of operational buildings , 2012 .

[20]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques , 2011 .

[21]  Jeffrey S. Bohn,et al.  Construction Project Monitoring Using High-Resolution Automated Cameras , 2010 .

[22]  N. Lackey,et al.  Making Sense of Factor Analysis , 2003 .