A tale of three counties: Understanding wind development in the rural Midwestern United States

Understanding the context in which local wind farm development has been accepted by the local community is important for meeting the United States' wind energy goals. To further this understanding in the rural Midwest, we investigated three counties in Indiana with varying levels of wind farm development using a mail survey, stakeholder interviews and a review of local newspaper articles and government documents. We found high levels of acceptance for wind energy in general and for local wind farms in all three counties despite the differences in actual development. Multiple statistical methods were employed to identify factors leading to support of wind turbines within the community, but support was so high that no individual factors were identified as statistically significant. The survey and interviews showed that reasons for support of wind energy include economic benefits to the local community, environmental benefits and the protection of the agricultural lifestyle and landscape. Reasons for opposition include concerns about setback distances, impacts on rural lifestyles, and impacts on other types of development. Despite overall community support, the support of the local county governments varied and appears to have greatly impacted wind farm development within their jurisdictions.

[1]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[2]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[3]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[4]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[5]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[6]  M. Slattery,et al.  Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .

[7]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Undesired reinforcement of harmful ‘self-evident truths’ concerning the implementation of wind power , 2012 .

[8]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Altamont: Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape , 1987 .

[9]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[10]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: exploring public beliefs and policy implications , 2005 .

[11]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[12]  Michael C. Slattery,et al.  The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains , 2012 .

[13]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Wind Energy Landscapes: Society and Technology in the California Desert , 2001 .

[14]  David Toke,et al.  Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Rational Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes? , 2002 .

[15]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[16]  Ben Hoen,et al.  Wind Energy Facilities and Residential Properties: The Effect of Proximity and View on Sales Prices , 2011 .

[17]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[18]  C. Brannstrom,et al.  Social Perspectives on Wind-Power Development in West Texas , 2011 .

[19]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[20]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .