Damage identification under uncertain mass density distributions

Abstract Nondestructive damage identification is a central task, for example, in aeronautical, civil and naval engineering. The identification approaches based on (physical) models rely on the predictive accuracy of the forward model, and typically suffer from effects caused by ubiquitous modeling errors and uncertainties. The present paper considers the identification of defects in beams and plates under uncertain mass density distribution and present some examples using synthetic data. We show that conventional maximum likelihood and conventional maximum a posteriori approaches can yield unfeasible estimates in the presence of such uncertainties even when the actual damage can be parameterized/described only with a few parameters. To partially compensate for mass density uncertainties, we adopt the Bayesian approximation error approach (BAE) for inverse problems which is based on (approximative) marginalization over the model uncertainties.

[1]  Sanghyun Choi,et al.  Nondestructive damage identification in plate structures using changes in modal compliance , 2005 .

[2]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification , 2015 .

[3]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Statistical and computational inverse problems , 2004 .

[4]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Approximation error approach in spatiotemporally chaotic models with application to Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation , 2018, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[5]  D. A. Castello,et al.  A flexibility-based continuum damage identification approach , 2005 .

[6]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Bayesian approximation error approach in full-wave ultrasound tomography , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[7]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Corrections to linear methods for diffuse optical tomography using approximation error modelling , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[8]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Probabilistic damage identification of a designed 9-story building using modal data in the presence of modeling errors , 2017 .

[9]  J. Kaipio,et al.  Compensation of errors due to discretization, domain truncation and unknown contact impedances in electrical impedance tomography , 2009 .

[10]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[11]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  Railway ballast damage detection by Markov chain Monte Carlo-based Bayesian method , 2018 .

[12]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Effects of changing ambient temperature on finite element model updating of the Dowling Hall Footbridge , 2012 .

[13]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Modeling errors due to Timoshenko approximation in damage identification , 2019, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[14]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification , 2016 .

[15]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Effects of thermal environment on structural frequencies: Part I – A simulation study , 2014 .

[16]  Catherine E. Powell,et al.  An Introduction to Computational Stochastic PDEs , 2014 .

[17]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Effect of matrix cracking and material uncertainty on composite plates , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Zhengqi Lu,et al.  Damage identification in plates using finite element model updating in time domain , 2013 .

[19]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: A review , 2015 .

[20]  J. Kaipio,et al.  The Bayesian approximation error approach for electrical impedance tomography—experimental results , 2007 .

[21]  J. Kaipio,et al.  Approximation error analysis in nonlinear state estimation with an application to state-space identification , 2007 .

[22]  Xuan Kong,et al.  The State-of-the-Art on Framework of Vibration-Based Structural Damage Identification for Decision Making , 2017 .

[23]  Tanja Tarvainen,et al.  MARGINALIZATION OF UNINTERESTING DISTRIBUTED PARAMETERS IN INVERSE PROBLEMS-APPLICATION TO DIFFUSE OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY , 2011 .

[24]  Ney Roitman,et al.  Impact of Damping Models in Damage Identification , 2019, Shock and Vibration.

[25]  Ilaria Venanzi,et al.  Robust optimal design of tuned mass dampers for tall buildings with uncertain parameters , 2015 .

[26]  A. Long,et al.  Uncertainty in the manufacturing of fibrous thermosetting composites: A review , 2014 .

[27]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[28]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Approximate marginalization over modelling errors and uncertainties in inverse problems , 2013 .

[29]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Approximation errors and model reduction with an application in optical diffusion tomography , 2006 .

[30]  A. G. Poulimenos,et al.  A transmittance-based methodology for damage detection under uncertainty: An application to a set of composite beams with manufacturing variability subject to impact damage and varying operating conditions , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[31]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Aristotelian prior boundary conditions , 2006 .

[32]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Compensation of Modelling Errors Due to Unknown Domain Boundary in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  An approximation error approach for compensating for modelling errors between the radiative transfer equation and the diffusion approximation in diffuse optical tomography , 2009 .

[34]  Christian Soize,et al.  Nonparametric stochastic modeling of structures with uncertain boundary conditions / coupling between substructures , 2013 .

[35]  Michael I Friswell,et al.  Damage identification using inverse methods , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  Steffen Marburg,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in natural frequencies and radiated acoustic power of composite plates: Analytical and experimental investigation , 2015 .

[37]  J. Kaipio,et al.  RECONSTRUCTION OF DOMAIN BOUNDARY AND CONDUCTIVITY IN ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY USING THE APPROXIMATION ERROR APPROACH , 2011 .

[38]  J. Reddy Theory and Analysis of Elastic Plates and Shells , 2006 .

[39]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Damage identification in plates under uncertain boundary conditions , 2020 .

[40]  I Venanzi,et al.  Robust optimization of control devices for tall buildings with uncertain mass distribution , 2014 .

[41]  Ville Kolehmainen,et al.  Correction of Model Reduction Errors in Simulations , 2018, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[42]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating and Model Class Selection for Hysteretic Structural Models Using Stochastic Simulation , 2008 .

[43]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Approximation errors and truncation of computational domains with application to geophysical tomography , 2007 .

[44]  J. Reddy An introduction to the finite element method , 1989 .

[45]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Statistical inverse problems: discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes , 2007 .

[46]  Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals with approximate wave propagation models , 2014 .

[47]  Andreas Hauptmann,et al.  Learning and correcting non-Gaussian model errors , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[48]  J. Kaipio,et al.  Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals in the presence of material and source uncertainties , 2015 .

[49]  George S. Dulikravich,et al.  A Survey of Basic Deterministic, Heuristic, and Hybrid Methods for Single-Objective Optimization and Response Surface Generation , 2011 .

[50]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Direct Estimation of Optical Parameters From Photoacoustic Time Series in Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[51]  I. Smith,et al.  Structural identification with systematic errors and unknown uncertainty dependencies , 2013 .

[52]  Thiago G. Ritto,et al.  Uncertain boundary condition Bayesian identification from experimental data: A case study on a cantilever beam , 2016 .

[53]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Effects of thermal environment on structural frequencies: Part II – A system identification model , 2014 .

[54]  S. S. Law,et al.  Differentiating damage effects in a structural component from the time response , 2010 .

[55]  D. A. Castello,et al.  A structural defect identification approach based on a continuum damage model , 2002 .

[56]  Sourav Banerjee,et al.  Effect of void sizes on effective material properties of unidirectional composite materials , 2019, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[57]  M. Géradin,et al.  Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics , 1994 .

[58]  Yong Huang,et al.  State-of-the-art review on Bayesian inference in structural system identification and damage assessment , 2018, Advances in Structural Engineering.

[59]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A first course in finite elements , 2007 .