Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar unitary forces and displacements in the laser trap.

Purified smooth muscle myosin in the in vitro motility assay propels actin filaments at 1/10 the velocity, yet produces 3-4 times more force than skeletal muscle myosin. At the level of a single myosin molecule, these differences in force and actin filament velocity may be reflected in the size and duration of single motion and force-generating events, or in the kinetics of the cross-bridge cycle. Specifically, an increase in either unitary force or duty cycle may explain the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth muscle myosin. Similarly, an increase in attached time or decrease in unitary displacement may explain the reduced actin filament velocity of smooth muscle myosin. To discriminate between these possibilities, we used a laser trap to measure unitary forces and displacements from single smooth and skeletal muscle myosin molecules. We analyzed our data using mean-variance analysis, which does not rely on scoring individual events by eye, and emphasizes periods in the data with constant properties. Both myosins demonstrated multiple but similar event populations with discrete peaks at approximately +11 and -11 nm in displacement, and 1.5 and 3.5 pN in force. Mean attached times for smooth muscle myosin were longer than for skeletal-muscle myosin. These results explain much of the difference in actin filament velocity between these myosins, and suggest that an increased duty cycle is responsible for the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth over skeletal-muscle myosin.

[1]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Sliding movement of single actin filaments on one-headed myosin filaments , 1987, Nature.

[2]  C S Peskin,et al.  Coordinated hydrolysis explains the mechanical behavior of kinesin. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[3]  J. Spudich,et al.  Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps , 1994, Nature.

[4]  J B Patlak,et al.  Measuring kinetics of complex single ion channel data using mean-variance histograms. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Patlak,et al.  Kinetic diversity of Na+ channel bursts in frog skeletal muscle , 1989, The Journal of general physiology.

[6]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Cross-bridge elasticity in single smooth muscle cells , 1983, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  James A. Spudich,et al.  Myosin subfragment-1 is sufficient to move actin filaments in vitro , 1987, Nature.

[8]  B. Brenner,et al.  Distinct molecular processes associated with isometric force generation and rapid tension recovery after quick release. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[9]  J. Burns,et al.  Single-molecule mechanics of heavy meromyosin and S1 interacting with rabbit or Drosophila actins using optical tweezers. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[10]  E. Taylor,et al.  Comparison of the myosin and actomyosin ATPase mechanisms of the four types of vertebrate muscles. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  J. Spudich,et al.  The neck region of the myosin motor domain acts as a lever arm to generate movement. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor using nano-manipulation. , 1994, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  A. Mehta,et al.  Characterization of single actin-myosin interactions. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[14]  K. Trybus,et al.  Smooth muscle myosin cross-bridge interactions modulate actin filament sliding velocity in vitro , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  The rigor configuration of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin trapped by a zero-length cross-linker. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[16]  K. Trybus,et al.  Chimeric Substitutions of the Actin-binding Loop Activate Dephosphorylated but Not Phosphorylated Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  D. Warshaw Force: velocity relationship in single isolated toad stomach smooth muscle cells , 1987, The Journal of general physiology.

[18]  Y. Zhao,et al.  Cross-bridge scheme and force per cross-bridge state in skinned rabbit psoas muscle fibers. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[19]  S. Block One small step for myosin... , 1995, Nature.

[20]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Biological applications of optical forces. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[21]  J. D. Pardee,et al.  [18] Purification of muscle actin , 1982 .

[22]  H. Huxley Sliding filaments and molecular motile systems. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Enhanced force generation by smooth muscle myosin in vitro. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. T. Tregear,et al.  Movement and force produced by a single myosin head , 1995, Nature.

[25]  J. Spudich,et al.  Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Periasamy,et al.  Characterization of a mammalian smooth muscle myosin heavy-chain gene: complete nucleotide and protein coding sequence and analysis of the 5' end of the gene. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  M. Periasamy,et al.  Identification of a novel smooth muscle myosin heavy chain cDNA: isoform diversity in the S1 head region. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[28]  James A. Spudich,et al.  How molecular motors work , 1994, Nature.

[29]  S. Ishiwata,et al.  Stepwise motion of an actin filament over a small number of heavy meromyosin molecules is revealed in an in vitro motility assay. , 1994, Journal of biochemistry.

[30]  D A Winkelmann,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. , 1993, Science.

[31]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Smooth and skeletal muscle actin are mechanically indistinguishable in the in vitro motility assay. , 1993, Circulation research.

[32]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[33]  R. A. Murphy,et al.  Force-Generating Capacity and Contractile Protein Content of Arterial Smooth Muscle , 1974, The Journal of general physiology.

[34]  S. Chu,et al.  Quantitative measurements of force and displacement using an optical trap. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Fredric S. Fay,et al.  Mechanical transients of single toad stomach smooth muscle cells. Effects of lowering temperature and extracellular calcium , 1990, The Journal of general physiology.

[36]  K. Trybus,et al.  The essential light chain is required for full force production by skeletal muscle myosin. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Smooth and skeletal muscle myosin both exhibit low duty cycles at zero load in vitro. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[38]  H D White,et al.  ADP dissociation from actomyosin subfragment 1 is sufficiently slow to limit the unloaded shortening velocity in vertebrate muscle. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Steven M. Block,et al.  Analysis of high resolution recordings of motor movement. , 1995, Biophysical journal.