The effect of communicational signals on drivers' subjective appraisal and visual attention during interactive driving scenarios

Communicational signals (e.g. lights and horns) are imperative for on-road interaction between drivers. The aim of the present study was to explore how these signals affect drivers' subjective appraisal and visual attention, and how drivers decode the signals from other vehicles within a variety of interactive contexts. Twenty-five male participants (20 valid samples, ranging from 21 to 29 years of age) were recruited to watch film clips of pre-designed interactive scenarios involving common vehicle signals in a full-view simulator (i.e. including road view and mirror views). Participants' attitudes towards the interacting vehicle's behaviours, emotional responses, fixation metrics, and decoded meanings were recorded and analysed. The majority of tested signals, with the exception of the horn used in the behind vehicles, significantly improved drivers' attitudes and pleasure. All signals significantly increased emotional arousal, as well as the total fixation time and mean fixation duration on the interacting vehicle. When the interacting vehicle was visible in mirrors, the signal usage significantly increased the fixation frequency towards it. Meanwhile, a significant decrease in total fixation time and mean fixation duration on the road was reported. The results also demonstrated that the decoded signal contained several meanings simultaneously depending on both the signal type and its interactive context. This study quantified the communication process via vehicular signals under typical situations involving other vehicles, and also suggested new ideas on how to establish more advanced communication between drivers.

[1]  K Renge Effect of driving experience on drivers' decoding process of roadway interpersonal communication , 2000, Ergonomics.

[2]  G Underwood,et al.  Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver , 2007, Ergonomics.

[3]  Saïd Mammar,et al.  Wireless Local Danger Warning: Cooperative Foresighted Driving Using Intervehicle Communication , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Anthony J. Lambert,et al.  Visual orienting in response to attentional cues: Spatial correspondence is critical, conscious awareness is not , 2011 .

[5]  Benjamin W. Tatler,et al.  Systematic tendencies in scene viewing , 2008 .

[6]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers , 2003, Ergonomics.

[7]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  T. Jones Emotional Communication in Conflict: Essence and Impact , 2001 .

[9]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Communication and Attitude Change: Causes, Processes, and Effects , 2005 .

[10]  R. Shor SHARED PATTERNS OF NONVERBAL NORMATIVE EXPECTATIONS IN AUTOMOBILE DRIVING. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.

[11]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  MODELLING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DRIVER IN-VEHICLE VISUAL DEMANS AND ACCIDENT OCCURRENCE , 1998 .

[12]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  J W Prentice THE EVASIVE ACTION DECISION IN AN INTERSECTION ACCIDENT: A GRAME THEORY APPROACH , 1974 .

[14]  M. Dawson,et al.  Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[15]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  David Crundall,et al.  Driving simulator validation with hazard perception , 2011 .

[17]  Percy H. Tannenbaum,et al.  Initial Attitude Toward Source and Concept as Factors in Attitude Change Through Communication , 1956 .

[18]  Donald H. Taylor Accidents, Risks, and Models of Explanation , 1976 .

[19]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Andrew D. M. Smith,et al.  Establishing Communication Systems without Explicit Meaning Transmission , 2001, ECAL.

[21]  David Crundall,et al.  Selective searching while driving: the role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance , 2002, Ergonomics.

[22]  Lars Åberg,et al.  Speed choice in relation to speed limit and influences from other drivers , 2000 .

[23]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  L. Camras,et al.  Emotional Development: Action, Communication, and Understanding , 2007 .

[25]  D. H. Taylor,et al.  DRIVERS' GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE AND THE RISK OF ACCIDENT , 1964 .

[26]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[27]  D TRUMBO,et al.  Social setting and conformity to a legal requirement. , 1957, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[28]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2001 .

[29]  K. Scherer,et al.  Vocal expression and communication of emotion. , 1993 .

[30]  E. Hazlett,et al.  The relationship between skin conductance orienting and the allocation of processing resources. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Jon D. Morris Observations: SAM: The Self-Assessment Manikin An Efficient Cross-Cultural Measurement Of Emotional Response 1 , 1995 .

[32]  Gerald J.S. Wilde,et al.  Social Interaction Patterns in Driver Behavior: An Introductory Review , 1976 .

[33]  P. Chapman,et al.  Visual Search of Driving Situations: Danger and Experience , 1998, Perception.

[34]  Theodore L. Willke,et al.  A survey of inter-vehicle communication protocols and their applications , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[35]  Mohammed A. Hannan,et al.  Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges , 2013 .

[36]  Lars Åberg,et al.  Driver Behaviour in Intersections: Formal and Informal Traffic Rules , 2005 .

[37]  Pieter Blignaut,et al.  The effect of fixational eye movements on fixation identification with a dispersion-based fixation detection algorithm , 2009 .

[38]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[39]  I. Ajzen Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .