The paper takes advantage of the Polish context for which it was prepared to begin with an analogy between Polish jazz, in what is often called its „golden age‟ of the 1960s and 1970s, and European sociology of law in the same period. These two very different enterprises were often „officially‟ seen as suspect but also potentially useful, and both were highly creative adaptations of inherited resources. European sociology of law could appear helpful to the state and at the same time a preserve of very non-conformist scholars. Yet its nonconformism was built on well established sociological methods and theories. This combination of secure intellectual foundations and political/ professional tensions may have been a recipe for special innovation and creativity.However, some of the intellectual security on which sociology of law was built is now being undermined, especially through new approaches to theory. Also, the political/ professional tensions and insecurities that helped make sociology of law intellectually unconventional are disappearing. The paper argues that sociology of law should re-establish its subversive potential in particular ways, and should firmly defend its special sociological vision without being confined by sociology‟s disciplinary boundaries.
[1]
W. Schluchter.
The Sociology of Law as an Empirical Theory of Validity
,
2002
.
[2]
R. Cotterrell,et al.
Spectres of Transnationalism: Changing Terrains of Sociology of Law
,
2009
.
[3]
B. Kutchinsky,et al.
Knowledge and opinion about law
,
1973
.
[4]
R. Cotterrell.
The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy
,
1992
.
[5]
Zygmunt Bauman,et al.
Society under Siege
,
2002
.
[6]
Anthony Elliott,et al.
The new individualism: the emotional costs of globalization
,
2009
.
[7]
H. Genn.
Paths to Justice: What people do and think about going to law
,
1999
.
[8]
Rogers Brubaker.
The limits of rationality: An essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber
,
1984
.