Negative pressure wound therapy for treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.

BACKGROUND Following surgery, incisions are usually closed by fixing the edges together with sutures (stitches), staples, adhesive glue or clips. This process helps the cut edges heal together and is called 'healing by primary intention'. However, not all incised wounds are closed in this way: where there is high risk of infection, or when there has been significant tissue loss, wounds may be left open to heal from the 'bottom up'. This delayed healing is known as 'healing by secondary intention'. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is one treatment option for surgical wounds that are healing by secondary intention. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the healing of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI) in any care setting. SEARCH METHODS For this review, in May 2015 we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations; Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of NPWT with alternative treatments or different types of NPWT in the treatment of SWHSI. We excluded open abdominal wounds from this review as they are the subject of a separate Cochrane review that is in draft. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. MAIN RESULTS We located two studies (69 participants) for inclusion in this review. One study compared NPWT with an alginate dressing in the treatment of open, infected groin wounds. and one study compared NPWT with a silicone dressing in the treatment of excised pilonidal sinus. The trials reported limited outcome data on healing, adverse events and resource use. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently no rigorous RCT evidence available regarding the clinical effectiveness of NPWT in the treatment of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention as defined in this review. The potential benefits and harms of using this treatment for this wound type remain largely uncertain.

[1]  L. Gottlieb,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Subatmospheric Wound Therapy With a Sealed Gauze Dressing and the Standard Vacuum-Assisted Closure Device , 2012, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  D. Legemate,et al.  Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. , 2004, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

[3]  N. Mihalopoulos,et al.  Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial. , 2010, Surgery.

[4]  I. V. van Rooij,et al.  The Clinical Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure Technique in the Management of Acute and Chronic Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  M. Jeschke,et al.  Development of New Reconstructive Techniques: Use of Integra in Combination with Fibrin Glue and Negative-Pressure Therapy for Reconstruction of Acute and Chronic Wounds , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  Sally Freels,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analysis of the published literature for survival endpoints , 2004 .

[7]  G. McGwin,et al.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Severe Open Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  R. Lefering,et al.  Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Trials.

[9]  S. Acosta,et al.  Vacuum-assisted wound closure versus alginate for the treatment of deep perivascular wound infections in the groin after vascular surgery. , 2014, Journal of Vascular Surgery.

[10]  S. Hovius,et al.  Comparing conventional gauze therapy to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomised trial. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[11]  S. Sharp,et al.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. , 1999 .

[12]  G. Mody,et al.  A blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial of topical negative pressure wound closure in India. , 2008, Ostomy/wound management.

[13]  S. Hovius,et al.  An economic evaluation of the use of TNP on full-thickness wounds. , 2005, Journal of wound care.

[14]  E. Nicastri,et al.  Topical negative pressure to treat surgical site infections, with a focus on post-sternotomy infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Infection.

[15]  G. Mannaerts,et al.  The Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Open Wound Care After Surgical Excision , 2014, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  J. Dumville,et al.  A survey of patients with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention; an assessment of prevalence, aetiology, duration and management , 2017, Journal of tissue viability.

[17]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[19]  S. Acosta,et al.  Clinical outcome and microvascular blood flow in VAC®‐ and Sorbalgon®‐treated peri‐vascular infected wounds in the groin after vascular surgery – an early interim analysis , 2013, International Wound Journal.

[20]  J. Schoung,et al.  Use of vacuum-assisted wound closure to manage limb wounds in patients suffering from acute necrotizing fasciitis. , 2006, Asian journal of surgery.

[21]  S. T. Mees,et al.  Endo–vacuum Assisted Closure Treatment for Rectal Anastomotic Insufficiency , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  S. Hahn,et al.  Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[23]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  M. Bramkamp,et al.  Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[25]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Bacterial load in relation to vacuum‐assisted closure wound therapy: A prospective randomized trial , 2004, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[26]  D. Moher,et al.  Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases , 2011 .

[27]  G. Pellino,et al.  Effects of a New Pocket Device for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical Wounds of Patients Affected With Crohn’s Disease , 2014, Surgical innovation.

[28]  P. Vowden,et al.  The prevalence, management and outcome for acute wounds identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district. , 2009, Journal of tissue viability.

[29]  T. Fabian,et al.  Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[30]  N. Albert,et al.  Do Patient and Nurse Outcome Differences Exist Between 2 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems? , 2012, Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN).

[31]  S. Sauerland,et al.  Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. , 2011, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International.

[32]  U. Tuncel,et al.  Clinical evaluation of gauze‐based negative pressure wound therapy in challenging wounds , 2013, International Wound Journal.

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  A. Oxman,et al.  Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions , 2011 .

[35]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  L. Grothier,et al.  Using negative pressure therapy in wound healing. , 2012, Nursing times.

[37]  P. Drew,et al.  A point prevalence survey of wounds in north-east England. , 2007, Journal of wound care.

[38]  J. Dumville,et al.  Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[39]  K. Gelse,et al.  Negative pressure wound therapy to prevent seromas and treat surgical incisions after total hip arthroplasty , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[40]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[41]  Kutovoĭ Ab,et al.  [Treatment of purulent wounds using vacuum-therapy]. , 2011 .

[42]  B. Oh,et al.  Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and secondary intention healing after excision of acral lentiginous melanoma on the foot , 2013, British Journal of Dermatology.

[43]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses , 2008 .

[44]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.